The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct observation of second-order atom tunnelling
Open accessAbstract
Tunnelling of material particles through a classically impenetrable barrier constitutes one of the hallmark effects of quantum physics. When interactions between the particles compete with their mobility through a tunnel junction, intriguing dynamical behaviour can arise because the particles do not tunnel independently. In single-electron or Bloch transistors, for example, the tunnelling of an electron or Cooper pair can be enabled or suppressed by the presence of a second charge carrier due to Coulomb blockade. Here we report direct, time-resolved observations of the correlated tunnelling of two interacting ultracold atoms through a barrier in a double-well potential. For the regime in which the interactions between the atoms are weak and tunnel coupling dominates, individual atoms can tunnel independently, similar to the case of a normal Josephson junction. However, when strong repulsive interactions are present, two atoms located on one side of the barrier cannot separate, but are observed to tunnel together as a pair in a second-order co-tunnelling process. By recording both the atom position and phase coherence over time, we fully characterize the tunnelling process for a single atom as well as the correlated dynamics of a pair of atoms for weak and strong interactions. In addition, we identify a conditional tunnelling regime in which a single atom can only tunnel in the presence of a second particle, acting as a single atom switch. Such second-order tunnelling events, which are the dominating dynamical effect in the strongly interacting regime, have not been previously observed with ultracold atoms. Similar second-order processes form the basis of superexchange interactions between atoms on neighbouring lattice sites of a periodic potential, a central component of proposals for realizing quantum magnetism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Resonating Valence Bond State in La 2 CuO 4 and Superconductivity
Anderson, P. W. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · Cited by 7,719
Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935
Self-citationPossible new effects in superconductive tunnelling
Josephson, B. D. (1962) · Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0 · Cited by 4,130
Cold Bosonic Atoms in Optical Lattices
Jaksch, D., Bruder, C., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3108 · Cited by 3,685
Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition
Fisher, M. P. A., Weichman, P. B., Grinstein, G., & Fisher, D. S. (1989) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.40.546 · Cited by 3,512
Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices
Makhlin, Y., Schön, G., & Shnirman, A. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.357 · Cited by 2,508
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950
Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism
Auerbach, A. (1994) · Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0869-3 · Cited by 1,738
Likharev, K. K. (1979) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.101 · Cited by 1,638
Direct Observation of Tunneling and Nonlinear Self-Trapping in a Single Bosonic Josephson Junction
Albiez, M., Gati, R., Fölling, J., Hunsmann, S., Cristiani, M., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010402 · Cited by 1,587
Cited by
Many-body physics with ultracold gases
Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., & Zwerger, W. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 · Cited by 8,114
Self-citationQuantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases
Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., & Nascimbène, S. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2259 · Cited by 2,339
Self-citationTrotzky, S., Chen, Y.-A., Flesch, A., McCulloch, I. P., Schollwöck, U., Eisert, J., & Bloch, I. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2232 · Cited by 1,058
Self-citationDirect measurement of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands
Atala, M., Aidelsburger, M., Barreiro, J. T., Abanin, D., Kitagawa, T., Demler, E., & Bloch, I. (2013) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2790 · Cited by 974
Self-citationQuantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice
Simon, J., Bakr, W. S., Ma, R., Tai, M. E., Preiss, P. M., & Greiner, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09994 · Cited by 898
Metadata
- Authors
- Fölling, S., Trotzky, S., Cheinet, P., Feld, M., Saers, R., Widera, A., Müller, T., & Bloch, I.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 7157
- Pages
- 1029-1032
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2159650664
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 30.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct observation of second-order atom tunnelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06112
- The paper
- Fölling, S., Trotzky, S., Cheinet, P., Feld, M., Saers, R., Widera, A., Müller, T., & Bloch, I. (2007). Direct observation of second-order atom tunnelling. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.