The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complete but curtailed T-cell response to very low-affinity antigen
Open accessAbstract
After an infection, T cells that carry the CD8 marker are activated and undergo a characteristic kinetic sequence of rapid expansion, subsequent contraction and formation of memory cells. The pool of naive T-cell clones is diverse and contains cells bearing T-cell antigen receptors (TCRs) that differ in their affinity for the same antigen. How these differences in affinity affect the function and the response kinetics of individual T-cell clones was previously unknown. Here we show that during the in vivo response to microbial infection, even very weak TCR–ligand interactions are sufficient to activate naive T cells, induce rapid initial proliferation and generate effector and memory cells. The strength of the TCR–ligand interaction critically affects when expansion stops, when the cells exit lymphoid organs and when contraction begins; that is, strongly stimulated T cells contract and exit lymphoid organs later than weakly stimulated cells. Our data challenge the prevailing view that strong TCR ligation is a prerequisite for CD8+ T-cell activation. Instead, very weak interactions are sufficient for activation, but strong TCR ligation is required to sustain T-cell expansion. We propose that in response to microbial challenge, T-cell clones with a broad range of avidities for foreign ligands are initially recruited, and that the pool of T cells subsequently matures in affinity owing to the more prolonged expansion of high-affinity T-cell clones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Joshi, N. S., Cui, W., Chandele, A., Lee, H. K., Urso, D. R., Hagman, J., Gapin, L., & Kaech, S. M. (2007) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.010 · Cited by 1,861
Cited by
Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation
Kaech, S. M., & Cui, W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3307 · Cited by 1,628
Understanding subset diversity in T cell memory
Jameson, S. C., & Masopust, D. (2018) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.02.010 · Cited by 523
Recent insights of T cell receptor-mediated signaling pathways for T cell activation and development
Hwang, J.-R., Byeon, Y., Kim, D., & Park, S.-G. (2020) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-020-0435-8 · Cited by 470
Hu, J. K., Kagari, T., Clingan, J. M., & Matloubian, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101881108 · Cited by 183
CD45 functions as a signaling gatekeeper in T cells
Courtney, A. H., Shvets, A. A., Lu, W., Griffante, G., Mollenauer, M., Horkova, V., Lo, W.-L., Yu, S., Stepanek, O., Chakraborty, A. K., et al. (2019) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaw8151 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Zehn, D., Lee, S. Y., & Bevan, M. J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2009-01-28
- Volume
- 458
- Issue
- 7235
- Pages
- 211-214
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2091218020
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.