Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supernova 2007bi as a pair-instability explosion

Open access
Gal-Yam, A., Mazzali, P., Ofek, E. O., Nugent, P. E., Kulkarni, S. R., Kasliwal, M. M., Quimby, R. M., Filippenko, A. V., Cenko, S. B., Chornock, R., Waldman, R., Kasen, D., Sullivan, M., Beshore, E. C., Drake, A. J., Thomas, R. C., Bloom, J. S., Poznanski, D., Miller, A. A., Foley, R. J., Silverman, J. M., Arcavi, I., Ellis, R. S., Deng, J.·2009·Nature

Abstract

Stars with initial masses such that 10 ≤ Minitial ≤ 100, where is the solar mass, fuse progressively heavier elements in their centres, until the core is inert iron. The core then gravitationally collapses to a neutron star or a black hole, leading to an explosion—an iron-core-collapse supernova. By contrast, extremely massive stars with Minitial ≥ 140 (if such exist) develop oxygen cores with masses, Mcore, that exceed 50, where high temperatures are reached at relatively low densities. Conversion of energetic, pressure-supporting photons into electron–positron pairs occurs before oxygen ignition and leads to a violent contraction which triggers a nuclear explosion that unbinds the star in a pair-instability supernova. Transitional objects with 100 < Minitial < 140 may end up as iron-core-collapse supernovae following violent mass ejections, perhaps as a result of brief episodes of pair instability, and may already have been identified. Here we report observations of supernova SN 2007bi, a luminous, slowly evolving object located within a dwarf galaxy. We estimate the exploding core mass to be Mcore ≈ 100, in which case theory unambiguously predicts a pair-instability supernova. We show that >3 of radioactive 56Ni was synthesized during the explosion and that our observations are well fitted by models of pair-instability supernovae. This indicates that nearby dwarf galaxies probably host extremely massive stars, above the apparent Galactic stellar mass limit, which perhaps result from processes similar to those that created the first stars in the Universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08579

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Gal-Yam, A., Mazzali, P., Ofek, E. O., Nugent, P. E., Kulkarni, S. R., Kasliwal, M. M., Quimby, R. M., Filippenko, A. V., Cenko, S. B., Chornock, R., Waldman, R., Kasen, D., Sullivan, M., Beshore, E. C., Drake, A. J., Thomas, R. C., Bloom, J. S., Poznanski, D., Miller, A. A., Foley, R. J., Silverman, J. M., Arcavi, I., Ellis, R. S., & Deng, J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-12
Volume
462
Issue
7273
Pages
624-627
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1977925093
Cited by
477
References
36
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supernova 2007bi as a pair-instability explosion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08579
The paper
Gal-Yam, A., Mazzali, P., Ofek, E. O., Nugent, P. E., Kulkarni, S. R., Kasliwal, M. M., Quimby, R. M., Filippenko, A. V., Cenko, S. B., Chornock, R., Waldman, R., Kasen, D., Sullivan, M., Beshore, E. C., Drake, A. J., Thomas, R. C., Bloom, J. S., Poznanski, D., Miller, A. A., . . . Deng, J. (2009). Supernova 2007bi as a pair-instability explosion. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08579

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.