The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fat cells reactivate quiescent neuroblasts via TOR and glial insulin relays in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Many stem, progenitor and cancer cells undergo periods of mitotic quiescence from which they can be reactivated. The signals triggering entry into and exit from this reversible dormant state are not well understood. In the developing Drosophila central nervous system, multipotent self-renewing progenitors called neuroblasts undergo quiescence in a stereotypical spatiotemporal pattern. Entry into quiescence is regulated by Hox proteins and an internal neuroblast timer. Exit from quiescence (reactivation) is subject to a nutritional checkpoint requiring dietary amino acids. Organ co-cultures also implicate an unidentified signal from an adipose/hepatic-like tissue called the fat body. Here we provide in vivo evidence that Slimfast amino-acid sensing and Target of rapamycin (TOR) signalling activate a fat-body-derived signal (FDS) required for neuroblast reactivation. Downstream of this signal, Insulin-like receptor signalling and the Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/TOR network are required in neuroblasts for exit from quiescence. We demonstrate that nutritionally regulated glial cells provide the source of Insulin-like peptides (ILPs) relevant for timely neuroblast reactivation but not for overall larval growth. Conversely, ILPs secreted into the haemolymph by median neurosecretory cells systemically control organismal size but do not reactivate neuroblasts. Drosophila thus contains two segregated ILP pools, one regulating proliferation within the central nervous system and the other controlling tissue growth systemically. Our findings support a model in which amino acids trigger the cell cycle re-entry of neural progenitors via a fat-body–glia–neuroblasts relay. This mechanism indicates that dietary nutrients and remote organs, as well as local niches, are key regulators of transitions in stem-cell behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif
Mangan, S., & Alon, U. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2133841100 · Cited by 1,827
Brogiolo, W., Stocker, H., Ikeya, T., Rintelen, F., Fernandez, R., & Hafen, E. (2001) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00068-9 · Cited by 1,255
Ablation of Insulin-Producing Neurons in Flies: Growth and Diabetic Phenotypes
Rulifson, E. J., Kim, S. K., & Nusse, R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070058 · Cited by 1,064
Slit Is the Midline Repellent for the Robo Receptor in Drosophila
Kidd, T., Bland, K. S., & Goodman, C. S. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80589-9 · Cited by 949
A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth
Colombani, J., Raisin, S., Pantalacci, S., Radimerski, T., Montagne, J., & Léopold, P. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00713-x · Cited by 809
Ikeya, T., Galic, M., Belawat, P., Nairz, K., & Hafen, E. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01043-6 · Cited by 766
Truman, J. W., & Bate, M. (1988) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(88)90067-x · Cited by 745
Isshiki, T., Pearson, B., Holbrook, S., & Doe, C. Q. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00465-2 · Cited by 684
Molecular Evolution and Functional Characterization of Drosophila Insulin-Like Peptides
Grönke, S., Clarke, D.-F., Broughton, S., Andrews, T. D., & Partridge, L. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000857 · Cited by 650
Puig, O., Marr, M. T., Ruhf, M. L., & Tjian, R. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1098703 · Cited by 619
Cited by
The many faces of insulin-like peptide signalling in the brain
Fernandez, A. M., & Torres-Alemán, I. (2012) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3209 · Cited by 872
Antioxidant Role for Lipid Droplets in a Stem Cell Niche of Drosophila
Bailey, A. P., Koster, G., Guillermier, C., Hirst, E. M. A., MacRae, J. I., Lechene, C. P., Postle, A. D., & Gould, A. P. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.020 · Cited by 686
Self-citationDrosophila neuroblasts: a model for stem cell biology
Homem, C. C. F., & Knoblich, J. A. (2012) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.080515 · Cited by 476
Altered Modes of Stem Cell Division Drive Adaptive Intestinal Growth
O'Brien, L. E., Soliman, S. S., Li, X., & Bilder, D. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.048 · Cited by 440
Mitotic Spindle Orientation in Asymmetric and Symmetric Cell Divisions during Animal Development
Morin, X., & Bellaïche, Y. (2011) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.012 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Sousa-Nunes, R., Yee, L. L., & Gould, A. P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-02-23
- Volume
- 471
- Issue
- 7339
- Pages
- 508-512
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2065293842
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fat cells reactivate quiescent neuroblasts via TOR and glial insulin relays in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09867
- The paper
- Sousa-Nunes, R., Yee, L. L., & Gould, A. P. (2011). Fat cells reactivate quiescent neuroblasts via TOR and glial insulin relays in Drosophila. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.