Cited by 684Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Somatic retrotransposition alters the genetic landscape of the human brain

Open access
Baillie, J. Kenneth, Barnett, Mark W., Upton, Kyle R., Gerhardt, Daniel J., Richmond, Todd A., De Sapio, Fioravante, Brennan, Paul M., Rizzu, Patrizia +11 more·2011·Nature

Abstract

Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that use a germline 'copy-and-paste' mechanism to spread throughout metazoan genomes. At least 50 per cent of the human genome is derived from retrotransposons, with three active families (L1, Alu and SVA) associated with insertional mutagenesis and disease. Epigenetic and post-transcriptional suppression block retrotransposition in somatic cells, excluding early embryo development and some malignancies. Recent reports of L1 expression and copy number variation in the human brain suggest that L1 mobilization may also occur during later development. However, the corresponding integration sites have not been mapped. Here we apply a high-throughput method to identify numerous L1, Alu and SVA germline mutations, as well as 7,743 putative somatic L1 insertions, in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus of three individuals. Surprisingly, we also found 13,692 somatic Alu insertions and 1,350 SVA insertions. Our results demonstrate that retrotransposons mobilize to protein-coding genes differentially expressed and active in the brain. Thus, somatic genome mosaicism driven by retrotransposition may reshape the genetic circuitry that underpins normal and abnormal neurobiological processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10531

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrotransposition occurs more frequently in the brain, and in particular in the hippocampus and striatum, relative to other somatic tissues such as blood, heart and liver.

    “Several other reports have indicated that retrotransposition occurs more frequently in the brain, and in particular in the hippocampus and striatum, relative to other somatic tissues, such as blood, heart and liver45,46.”

    From SIRT6 represses LINE1 retrotransposons by ribosylating KAP1 but this repression fails with stress and age (2014) · cites this paper as [45]

    The paper’s Abstract reports somatic retrotransposon insertions in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus, a part of the striatum. It does not compare retrotransposition frequency in those regions with blood, heart, or liver, so the claimed higher frequency relative to those tissues is not supported by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several neurological disorders, including Rhett Syndrome, Smith-Magenis syndrome and schizophrenia, are characterized by dysregulation of L1 activity.

    “several neurological disorders, including Rhett Syndrome, Smith–Magenis syndrome and schizophrenia are characterized by dysregulation of L1 activity27,45,47.”

    From SIRT6 represses LINE1 retrotransposons by ribosylating KAP1 but this repression fails with stress and age (2014) · cites this paper as [45]

    The passage on disease implications (page unavailable in our copy) says MeCP2 deletion increases L1 copy number and may affect neuronal maturation in Rett syndrome. Another passage links RAI1 to Smith–Magenis syndrome and schizophrenia, but describes an Alu insertion in that gene—not dysregulated L1 activity in either disorder. The paper therefore does not support the claim for all three disorders. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • De novo insertions of retrotransposons preferentially affect actively transcribed genes in the brain, including dopamine receptors, amino acid transporters and genes regulating synaptic transmission.

    “de novo insertions of retrotransposons appear to preferentially affect actively transcribed genes in the brain, including dopamine receptors, amino acid transporters and genes regulating synaptic transmission45.”
  • When transposable elements, especially retrotransposons, are activated, they mobilize through an RNA intermediate and can cause somatic mutations or large genomic rearrangements via their insertion into random segments of the genome.

    “When TEs, especially retrotransposons, are activated, they mobilize through an RNA intermediate and can cause somatic mutations or large genomic rearrangements via their insertion into random segments of the genome [241, 242]”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [241]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Kazazian HH Jr. Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution Science 2004 303 1626 32 15016989
  2. [2]Cordaux R Batzer MA The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution Nat Rev Genet 2009 10 691 703 19763152 PMC2884099
  3. [3]Xing J Mobile elements create structural variation: analysis of a complete human genome Genome Res 2009 19 1516 26 19439515 PMC2752133
  4. [4]Garcia-Perez JL Epigenetic silencing of engineered L1 retrotransposition events in human embryonic carcinoma cells Nature 2010 466 769 73 20686575 PMC3034402
  5. [5]Yang N Kazazian HH Jr. L1 retrotransposition is suppressed by endogenously encoded small interfering RNAs in human cultured cells Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006 13 763 71 16936727
  6. [6]Iskow RC Natural Mutagenesis of Human Genomes by Endogenous Retrotransposons Cell 2010 141 1253 1261 20603005 PMC2943760
  7. [7]Kano H L1 retrotransposition occurs mainly in embryogenesis and creates somatic mosaicism Genes Dev 2009 23 1303 12 19487571 PMC2701581
  8. [8]Belancio VP Roy-Engel AM Pochampally RR Deininger P Somatic expression of LINE-1 elements in human tissues Nucleic Acids Res 2010 PMC2896524 20215437
  9. [9]Faulkner GJ The regulated retrotransposon transcriptome of mammalian cells Nat Genet 2009 41 563 71 19377475
  10. [10]Coufal NG L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells Nature 2009 460 1127 31 19657334 PMC2909034
  11. [11]Muotri AR L1 retrotransposition in neurons is modulated by MeCP2 Nature 2010 468 443 446 21085180 PMC3059197
  12. [12]Muotri AR Somatic mosaicism in neuronal precursor cells mediated by L1 retrotransposition Nature 2005 435 903 10 15959507
  13. [13]Eriksson PS Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus Nat Med 1998 4 1313 7 9809557
  14. [14]Singer T McConnell MJ Marchetto MC Coufal NG Gage FH LINE-1 retrotransposons: mediators of somatic variation in neuronal genomes? Trends Neurosci 2010 33 345 54 20471112 PMC2916067
  15. [15]Cost GJ Golding A Schlissel MS Boeke JD Target DNA chromatinization modulates nicking by L1 endonuclease Nucleic Acids Res 2001 29 573 7 11139628 PMC29664
  16. [16]Ewing AD Kazazian HH Jr. High-throughput sequencing reveals extensive variation in human-specific L1 content in individual human genomes Genome Res 2010 20 1262 70 20488934 PMC2928504
  17. [17]Wang J dbRIP: a highly integrated database of retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms in humans Hum Mutat 2006 27 323 9 16511833 PMC1855216
  18. [18]Morrish TA DNA repair mediated by endonuclease-independent LINE-1 retrotransposition Nat Genet 2002 31 159 65 12006980
  19. [19]Dewannieux M Esnault C Heidmann T LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences Nat Genet 2003 35 41 8 12897783
  20. [21]Feschotte C Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks Nat Rev Genet 2008 9 397 405 18368054 PMC2596197
  21. [24]Huang CR Mobile Interspersed Repeats Are Major Structural Variants in the Human Genome Cell 2010 141 1171 1182 20602999 PMC2943426
  22. [25]Nan X Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex Nature 1998 393 386 9 9620804
  23. [26]Kazantsev AG Thompson LM Therapeutic application of histone deacetylase inhibitors for central nervous system disorders Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008 7 854 68 18827828
  24. [27]Slager RE Newton TL Vlangos CN Finucane B Elsea SH Mutations in RAI1 associated with Smith-Magenis syndrome Nat Genet 2003 33 466 8 12652298
  25. [28]Mattick JS RNA as the substrate for epigenome-environment interactions: RNA guidance of epigenetic processes and the expansion of RNA editing in animals underpins development, phenotypic plasticity, learning, and cognition Bioessays 2010 32 548 52 20544741
  26. [29]Miki Y Disruption of the APC gene by a retrotransposal insertion of L1 sequence in a colon cancer Cancer Res 1992 52 643 5 1310068
  27. [30]Chahrour M Zoghbi HY The story of Rett syndrome: from clinic to neurobiology Neuron 2007 56 422 37 17988628

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baillie, J. K., Barnett, M. W., Upton, K. R., Gerhardt, D. J., Richmond, T. A., De Sapio, F., Brennan, P. M., Rizzu, P., Smith, S., Fell, M., Talbot, R. T., Gustincich, S., Freeman, T. C., Mattick, J. S., Hume, D. A., Heutink, P., Carninci, P., Jeddeloh, J. A., & Faulkner, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Roslin Institute (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Corresponding author
Faulkner, Geoffrey J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-10-30
Volume
479
Issue
7374
Pages
534-537
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2032679533
Cited by
684
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 66
FWCI
78.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (090385, 090385/Z/09/Z)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/D/05191131, BBS/E/D/05191130, BB/H005935/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
somatic retrotransposition, LINE-1 retrotransposons, Alu elements, SVA retrotransposon, somatic mosaicism, human brain, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, germline mutations, somatic insertions, copy number variation, brain development, insertional mutagenesis
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Brain, Caudate Nucleus, Epistasis, Genetic, Hippocampus, Humans, Mosaicism, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Organ Specificity, Transcription Factors, Trans-Activators, Genome, Human, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Germ-Line Mutation, Retroelements, Alu Elements, Histone Deacetylase 1, DNA Copy Number Variations, Clonal Evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review