Cited by 455Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsSirtuins and Resveratrol in MedicineGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

SIRT6 represses LINE1 retrotransposons by ribosylating KAP1 but this repression fails with stress and age

Open access
Van Meter, Michael, Kashyap, Mehr, Rezazadeh, Sarallah, Geneva, Anthony J., Morello, Timothy D., Seluanov, Andrei, Gorbunova, Vera·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

L1 retrotransposons are an abundant class of transposable elements that pose a threat to genome stability and may have a role in age-related pathologies such as cancer. Recent evidence indicates that L1s become more active in somatic tissues during the course of ageing; however the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unknown. Here we report that the longevity regulating protein, SIRT6, is a powerful repressor of L1 activity. Specifically, SIRT6 binds to the 5'-UTR of L1 loci, where it mono-ADP ribosylates the nuclear corepressor protein, KAP1, and facilitates KAP1 interaction with the heterochromatin factor, HP1α, thereby contributing to the packaging of L1 elements into transcriptionally repressive heterochromatin. During the course of ageing, and also in response to DNA damage, however, we find that SIRT6 is depleted from L1 loci, allowing the activation of these previously silenced retroelements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms6011

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

47 of 59 cited sources checked · 30 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    L1 5′UTR sequences are heavily represented in the SIRT6 ChIP-seq dataset.

    “We observed that L1 5′UTR sequences were heavily represented in the SIRT6 ChIP-seq dataset (Supplementary Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Ram, O. et al. Combinatorial patterning of chromatin regulators uncovered by genome-wide location analysis in human cells. Cell 147, 1628–1639 (2011). source

      The Results section (‘A compendium of genome-wide CR maps’; page unavailable) establishes that the paper generated chromatin-regulator ChIP-seq datasets, including SIRT6 data discussed elsewhere in the Results. But the passages in our copy do not report that L1 5′UTR sequences are heavily represented; searches for that phrase and for LINE-1 enrichment found no such result. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    SIRT6 co-occupies approximately 10% of KAP1-bound promoters.

    “analysis of promoter arrays41,42 showed that SIRT6 only co-occupies approximately 10% of KAP1 bound promoters”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] Li, X. et al. Role for KAP1 serine 824 phosphorylation and sumoylation/desumoylation switch in regulating KAP1-mediated transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 36177–36189 (2007). source

      The introduction describes KAP1 as a transcriptional corepressor, and the Discussion examines its phosphorylation and desumoylation. Searches for SIRT6, promoter-array co-occupancy, and the approximately 10% figure found no passage addressing the claimed overlap. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [42] White, D. et al. The ATM substrate KAP1 controls DNA repair in heterochromatin: regulation by HP1 proteins and serine 473/824 phosphorylation. Mol. Cancer Res. 10, 401–414 (2012). source

      The Results passages discuss KAP1 with HP1 at a transgene array and KAP1 phosphorylation after DNA damage, not promoter occupancy. Searches for SIRT6, promoter arrays, and the approximately 10% overlap found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    DNA damage is more abundant in old cells and tissues.

    “DNA damage is more abundant in old cells and tissues37,38.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [37] Hoeijmakers, J. H. DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1475–1485 (2009). source
    • cites [38] Vijg, J. Aging genomes: a necessary evil in the logic of life. Bioessays (2014). source

      In “DNA damage is abundant, but does it cause aging?” (page unavailable), Vijg reports age-related increases in some forms of DNA damage in animal cells and tissues, but says the results are often conflicting. The section also reports increases in double-strand-break markers in aging mouse tissues and in breaks in human and mouse oocytes. These findings support the general direction of the claim, but not its unqualified assertion about DNA damage in old cells and tissues. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    L1s become more transcriptionally active during aging and senescence.

    “this study builds on the mounting body of evidence which suggests that L1s become more transcriptionally active during aging and senescence10,49”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] De Cecco, M. et al. Genomes of replicatively senescent cells undergo global epigenetic changes leading to gene silencing and activation of transposable elements. Aging Cell 12, 247–256 (2013). source

      The Results report increased L1 RNA expression in replicatively senescent cells (Fig. 3C), supporting the senescence portion of the claim. The Discussion links aging to changes that could permit transposable-element expression, but does not report increased L1 transcription during organismal aging. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [49] De Cecco, M. et al. Transposable elements become active and mobile in the genomes of aging mammalian somatic tissues. Aging (Albany NY) 5, 867–883 (2013). source
  • Premisecitation

    SIRT6 is a chromatin-associated protein.

    “Because SIRT6 is a chromatin-associated protein26”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Michishita, E., Park, J. Y., Burneskis, J. M., Barrett, J. C. & Horikawa, I. Evolutionarily conserved and nonconserved cellular localizations and functions of human SIRT proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16, 4623–4635 (2005). source
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    KAP1 plays a critical role in suppressing endogenous retroviruses and has emerged as a regulator of L1s.

    “KAP1 is known to play a critical role in suppressing endogenous retroviruses, and has recently emerged as a regulator of L1s as well31,40.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] Rowe, H. M. et al. KAP1 controls endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells. Nature 463, 237–240 (2010). source
    • cites [40] Castro-Diaz, N. et al. Evolutionally dynamic L1 regulation in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 28, 1397–1409 (2014). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    KAP1 is a pleiotropic regulator of diverse cellular processes including gene silencing, cell growth and differentiation, pluripotency, apoptosis, DNA repair, and maintenance of genomic integrity.

    “KAP1 is a pleiotropic regulator of a diverse range of cellular processes ranging from gene silencing, cell growth and differentiation, pluripotency, apoptosis, DNA repair, and maintenance of genomic integrity39.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Iyengar, S. & Farnham, P. J. KAP1 protein: an enigmatic master regulator of the genome. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26267–26276 (2011). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several neurological disorders, including Rhett Syndrome, Smith-Magenis syndrome and schizophrenia, are characterized by dysregulation of L1 activity.

    “several neurological disorders, including Rhett Syndrome, Smith–Magenis syndrome and schizophrenia are characterized by dysregulation of L1 activity27,45,47.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] Muotri, A. R. et al. L1 retrotransposition in neurons is modulated by MeCP2. Nature 468, 443–446 (2010). source

      The paper’s main text (page unavailable) reports increased L1 retrotransposition in Rett syndrome neuronal progenitor cells and brain tissue compared with controls. It does not address Smith–Magenis syndrome or schizophrenia, so it supports only the Rett syndrome part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [45] Baillie, J. K. et al. Somatic retrotransposition alters the genetic landscape of the human brain. Nature 479, 534–537 (2011). source

      The passage on disease implications (page unavailable in our copy) says MeCP2 deletion increases L1 copy number and may affect neuronal maturation in Rett syndrome. Another passage links RAI1 to Smith–Magenis syndrome and schizophrenia, but describes an Alu insertion in that gene—not dysregulated L1 activity in either disorder. The paper therefore does not support the claim for all three disorders. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [47] Jakovcevski, M. & Akbarian, S. Epigenetic mechanisms in neurological disease. Nat. Med. 18, 1194–1204 (2012). source

      In “Mutations affecting DNA methylation and neurological disease” (page unavailable), the review links Rett syndrome to MeCP2 defects and reports de-repression of retrotransposons in MeCP2-deficient neuronal chromatin. It does not establish dysregulated L1 activity as a characteristic of Smith–Magenis syndrome or schizophrenia; its mention of schizophrenia concerns MECP2 variants, not L1 activity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Retrotransposition occurs more frequently in the brain, and in particular in the hippocampus and striatum, relative to other somatic tissues such as blood, heart and liver.

    “Several other reports have indicated that retrotransposition occurs more frequently in the brain, and in particular in the hippocampus and striatum, relative to other somatic tissues, such as blood, heart and liver45,46.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [45] Baillie, J. K. et al. Somatic retrotransposition alters the genetic landscape of the human brain. Nature 479, 534–537 (2011). source

      The paper’s Abstract reports somatic retrotransposon insertions in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus, a part of the striatum. It does not compare retrotransposition frequency in those regions with blood, heart, or liver, so the claimed higher frequency relative to those tissues is not supported by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [46] Coufal, N. G. et al. L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells. Nature 460, 1127–1131 (2009). source

      The adult-tissue comparison (section labelled Abstract; page unavailable) found higher L1 ORF2 copy number in the hippocampus than in matched heart and liver, and a smaller increase across grouped brain regions. It included the caudate among sampled regions, but did not establish a separate striatal increase or compare brain tissue with blood. The authors also describe increased copy number as suggestive of retrotransposition, not proof that it occurs more frequently in the adult brain. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Post-translational modification of KAP1 plays a critical role in determining which cellular context the protein will function in.

    “post-translational modification of KAP1 plays a critical role in determining which cellular context the protein will function in; for example sumoylated KAP1 promotes regulation of gene expression, while phosphorylated KAP1 promotes DNA repair41,42.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] Li, X. et al. Role for KAP1 serine 824 phosphorylation and sumoylation/desumoylation switch in regulating KAP1-mediated transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 36177–36189 (2007). source

      The Discussion (page not available in our copy) supports the general point that KAP1 phosphorylation and sumoylation affect its function: sumoylation is linked to transcriptional repression, while phosphorylation after DNA damage reduces sumoylation and relieves repression. It also reports phosphorylated KAP1 at DNA lesions with damage-response factors, but does not establish the citing sentence’s stronger example that phosphorylated KAP1 promotes DNA repair. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [42] White, D. et al. The ATM substrate KAP1 controls DNA repair in heterochromatin: regulation by HP1 proteins and serine 473/824 phosphorylation. Mol. Cancer Res. 10, 401–414 (2012). source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) links KAP1 Ser 824 phosphorylation to effective DNA repair in heterochromatin, supporting the phosphorylation example. The paper also discusses KAP1-mediated gene silencing, but its text does not establish the sentence’s specific claim that sumoylated KAP1 regulates gene expression or that modifications determine mutually distinct functions; it reports that gene-silencing activity does not diminish in irradiated cells. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIRT6 promotes DNA double strand break repair, regulates telomere stability, suppresses inflammation and opposes tumorigenesis.

    “SIRT6 promotes DNA double strand break repair19,20, regulates telomere stability21, suppresses inflammation22 and opposes tumorigenesis23,24.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Mao, Z. et al. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science 332, 1443–1446 (2011). source
    • cites [20] Kaidi, A., Weinert, B. T., Choudhary, C. & Jackson, S. P. Human SIRT6 promotes DNA end resection through CtIP deacetylation. Science 329, 1348–1353 (2010). source
    • cites [21] Michishita, E. et al. SIRT6 is a histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylase that modulates telomeric chromatin. Nature 452, 492–496 (2008). source
    • cites [22] Kawahara, T. L. et al. SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. Cell 136, 62–74 (2009). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    De novo insertions of retrotransposons preferentially affect actively transcribed genes in the brain, including dopamine receptors, amino acid transporters and genes regulating synaptic transmission.

    “de novo insertions of retrotransposons appear to preferentially affect actively transcribed genes in the brain, including dopamine receptors, amino acid transporters and genes regulating synaptic transmission45.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Baillie, J. K. et al. Somatic retrotransposition alters the genetic landscape of the human brain. Nature 479, 534–537 (2011). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SIRT6 has been reported to mono-ADP ribosylate PARP1.

    “SIRT6 has been reported to mono-ADP ribosylate PARP119”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Mao, Z. et al. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science 332, 1443–1446 (2011). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    L1 retrotransposon activity has been linked to DNA damage, mutagenesis, and deregulation of host gene transcription.

    “Long interspersed element 1 (L1) retrotransposon activity, in particular, has been linked to DNA damage5, mutagenesis6,7, and deregulation of host gene transcription8.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [5] Gasior, S. L., Wakeman, T. P., Xu, B. & Deininger, P. L. The human LINE-1 retrotransposon creates DNA double-strand breaks. J. Mol. Biol. 357, 1383–1393 (2006). source
    • cites [6] Gilbert, N., Lutz-Prigge, S. & Moran, J. V. Genomic deletions created upon LINE-1 retrotransposition. Cell 110, 315–325 (2002). source
    • cites [7] Iskow, R. C. et al. Natural mutagenesis of human genomes by endogenous retrotransposons. Cell 141, 1253–1261 (2010). source
    • cites [8] Han, J. S., Szak, S. T. & Boeke, J. D. Transcriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes. Nature 429, 268–274 (2004). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Senescent cells have been implicated in the etiology of aging.

    “Senescent cells, which have been implicated in the etiology of aging35”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] van Deursen, J. M. The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature 509, 439–446 (2014). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The episomal L1-EGFP reporter plasmid and the L1 5′UTR-Luciferase reporter plasmid used in this study were both described previously.

    “The episomal L1-EGFP reporter plasmid and the L1 5′UTR-Luciferase reporter plasmid used in this study were both described previously25,50.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] Ostertag, E. M., Prak, E. T., DeBerardinis, R. J., Moran, J. V. & Kazazian, H. H. Jr. Determination of L1 retrotransposition kinetics in cultured cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1418–1423 (2000). source
    • cites [50] Athanikar, J. N., Badge, R. M. & Moran, J. V. A YY1-binding site is required for accurate human LINE-1 transcription initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3846–3855 (2004). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    L1 activity has been implicated in a variety of age-related disorders, including cancer and neurodegeneration.

    “L1 activity has been implicated in a variety of age-related disorders12, including cancer7,13 and neurodegeneration14,15.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [12] Hancks, D. C. & Kazazian, H. H. Jr. Active human retrotransposons: variation and disease. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 191–203 (2012). source

      The INSERTIONS AND DISEASE section reports multiple disease-causing retrotransposon insertions, and TIMING OF RETROTRANSPOSITION says somatic L1 activity may play a role in tumorigenesis. But the copy does not characterize these as age-related disorders or link L1 activity to neurodegeneration; its discussion of brain activity mentions Rett syndrome instead. In the citing sentence, the separate cancer and neurodegeneration citations do not establish those points for this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [7] Iskow, R. C. et al. Natural mutagenesis of human genomes by endogenous retrotransposons. Cell 141, 1253–1261 (2010). source
    • cites [13] Lee, E. et al. Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers. Science 337, 967–971 (2012). source
    • cites [14] Reilly, M. T., Faulkner, G. J., Dubnau, J., Ponomarev, I. & Gage, F. H. The role of transposable elements in health and diseases of the central nervous system. J. Neurosci. 33, 17577–17586 (2013). source
    • cites [15] Tan, H. et al. Retrotransposon activation contributes to fragile X premutation rCGG-mediated neurodegeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 57–65 (2012). source

      The Discussion reports that retrotransposon activation contributes to neurodegeneration in a fragile X fly model, supporting the neurodegeneration portion at the level of retrotransposons generally. It identifies gypsy, not L1, as the retrotransposon whose reduction suppresses neuronal toxicity; its discussion of cancer likewise does not implicate L1 specifically. The paper therefore does not support the broader claim about L1 activity across age-related disorders. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mechanisms that silence retrotransposons in somatic cells are not completely efficient and may deteriorate with age.

    “evidence has begun to accumulate indicating that the mechanisms which silence retrotransposons in somatic cells are not completely efficient9 and may deteriorate with age10,11.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] Belancio, V. P., Roy-Engel, A. M., Pochampally, R. R. & Deininger, P. Somatic expression of LINE-1 elements in human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3909–3922 (2010). source
    • cites [10] De Cecco, M. et al. Genomes of replicatively senescent cells undergo global epigenetic changes leading to gene silencing and activation of transposable elements. Aging Cell 12, 247–256 (2013). source
    • cites [11] St Laurent, G. 3rd, Hammell, N. & McCaffrey, T. A. A LINE-1 component to human aging: do LINE elements exact a longevity cost for evolutionary advantage? Mech. Ageing Dev. 131, 299–305 (2010). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIRT6 has multiple biochemical activities, including protein deacetylation and mono-ADP ribosylation.

    “SIRT6 has multiple biochemical activities, including protein deacetylation22 and mono-ADP ribosylation19,29.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] Kawahara, T. L. et al. SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. Cell 136, 62–74 (2009). source

      The citation to this paper is attached to mono-ADP ribosylation, not to protein deacetylation. The Introduction and Discussion describe SIRT6 as an H3K9 deacetylase, but searches for mono-ADP ribosylation, ADP-ribosylation, and ADP-ribosyltransferase found no passage addressing that activity. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Mao, Z. et al. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science 332, 1443–1446 (2011). source
    • cites [29] Liszt, G., Ford, E., Kurtev, M. & Guarente, L. Mouse Sir2 homolog SIRT6 is a nuclear ADP-ribosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 21313–21320 (2005). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PARP1 has been implicated in the silencing of retrotransposons in Drosophila.

    “a protein which has been implicated in the silencing of retrotransposons in Drosophila30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Tulin, A., Stewart, D. & Spradling, A. C. The Drosophila heterochromatic gene encoding poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is required to modulate chromatin structure during development. Genes Dev. 16, 2108–2119 (2002). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The luciferase assay using the L1-5′UTR reporter has been previously described.

    “The luciferase assay using the L1-5′UTR reporter has been previously described50.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Athanikar, J. N., Badge, R. M. & Moran, J. V. A YY1-binding site is required for accurate human LINE-1 transcription initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3846–3855 (2004). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In vitro mono-ADP ribosylation experiments were conducted essentially as previously described.

    “In vitro mono-ADP ribosylation experiments were conducted essentially as previously described19.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Mao, Z. et al. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science 332, 1443–1446 (2011). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    These bisulfite primers have been previously described.

    “These primers have been previously described51.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Kaneda, M. et al. Genetic evidence for Dnmt3a-dependent imprinting during oocyte growth obtained by conditional knockout with Zp3-Cre and complete exclusion of Dnmt3b by chimera formation. Genes Cells 15 169–179 (2010). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The vast majority of L1s in the human genome are 5′ truncated; average L1 length is approximately 900 bp and 90-95% of all L1s are 5′ truncated.

    “As the vast majority of L1s in the human genome are 5′ truncated (average L1 length is approximately 900bp, 90-95% of all L1s are 5′trunctated), this analysis was unsurprisingly skewed towards the 3′ end of L1s.”
    • Also stated in: § ChIP-seq analysis · plain
      “Multiple reports have described the ratio of human L1s that are truncated, we used these reports as the basis for adjusting raw read depth to normalized read depth53,54.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [53] Szak, S. T. et al. Molecular archeology of L1 insertions in the human genome. Genome Biol 3, research0052 (2002). source

      The Results section, “Characteristics of 5′ truncated L1 elements” (page not provided), says most human L1s are 5′ truncated and only 5% of the study’s 3′-intact L1s were full-length. That supports roughly 95% truncation for that subset, not explicitly for all L1s. The copy does not support an average length of approximately 900 bp; “Gene neighborhood of L1 insertions” instead reports a 1,614-nucleotide mean for the TSD-containing set. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] O'Geen, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of KAP1 binding suggests autoregulation of KRAB-ZNFs. PLoS Genet. 3, e89 (2007). source

      The Results section, “Identification of KAP1 Targets on a Genome-Wide Scale” (page unavailable), discusses KAP1 binding sites and an average binding-site span of 820 bp, not L1 length. Searches for L1/LINE-1, 5′ truncation, 900 bp, and 90–95% found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed L1 statistics. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MeCP2 and KAP1 are depleted from the L1 5′UTR in SIRT6 KO cells.

    “the heterochromatin regulating proteins MeCP2 (methyl CpG binding protein 2) and KAP1 (KRAB-associated protein 1) were also depleted from the L1 5′UTR in SIRT6 KO cells (Fig. 2c; Supplementary Fig. 7b, c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overexpression of WT SIRT6 and SIRT6 R65A restores KAP1-HP1α interactions to wild-type levels, whereas SIRT6 G60A or SIRT6 S56Y fail to restore them.

    “Overexpression of WT SIRT6 and SIRT6 R65A was sufficient to restore KAP1-HP1α interactions to wild-type levels; in contrast, overexpression of SIRT6 G60A or SIRT6 S56Y failed to restore KAP1-HP1α interactions (Fig. 3e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIRT6 transfers radiolabelled NAD+ to KAP1, but not to any other substrate tested.

    “SIRT6 transferred radiolabelled NAD+ to KAP1, but not to any other substrate tested (Fig. 3b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The final set of unique sequences after filtering was 2,548,326.

    “creating a final set of 2,548,326 unique sequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Reference alignment of SIRT6 ChIP-seq reads to a full-length L1 sequence was skewed towards the 3′ end of L1s.

    “this analysis was unsurprisingly skewed towards the 3′ end of L1s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The vast majority of sequences in the SIRT6 ChIP-seq dataset appeared exactly once.

    “The vast majority of sequences appeared exactly once.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SIRT6 and KAP1 cooperate to suppress retroelements but have divergent functions in regulation of gene expression.

    “suggesting that SIRT6 and Kap1 cooperate to suppress retroelements but have divergent functions in regulation of gene expression (Supplementary Fig. 14a-c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SIRT6 is normally localized to L1 loci, repressing their transcription by mono-ADP-ribosylating KAP1 and facilitating its interaction with HP1α; in response to stress, SIRT6 vacates these sites to facilitate DNA repair, creating a window for increased L1 activity.

    “This suggests a paradigm wherein SIRT6 is normally localized to L1 loci, repressing their transcription by mono-ADP-ribosylating Kap1 and facilitating its interaction with HP1α; in response to stress, however, SIRT6 vacates these sites in order to facilitate DNA repair, creating a window for increased L1 activity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIRT6 knockout mice develop a severe premature aging syndrome characterized by genomic instability, curvature of the spine, decreased bone mineral density, hypoglycemia and a severely shortened lifespan.

    “SIRT6 knockout mice develop a severe premature aging syndrome, characterized by genomic instability, curvature of the spine, decreased bone mineral density, hypoglycemia and a severely shortened lifespan16.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Mostoslavsky, R. et al. Genomic instability and aging-like phenotype in the absence of mammalian SIRT6. Cell 124, 315–329 (2006). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    L1 activity in the brain is particularly sensitive to upregulation during aging and in the absence of SIRT6.

    “our observation that L1 activity in the brain is particularly sensitive to upregulation during aging and in the absence of SIRT6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mice overexpressing SIRT6 exhibit extended mean and median lifespans, concomitant with improved metabolic function and cancer resistance.

    “mice overexpressing SIRT6 exhibit extended mean and median lifespans, concomitant with improved metabolic function17 and cancer resistance18.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] Kanfi, Y. et al. SIRT6 protects against pathological damage caused by diet-induced obesity. Aging Cell 9, 162–173 (2010). source
    • cites [18] Kanfi, Y. et al. The sirtuin SIRT6 regulates lifespan in male mice. Nature 483, 218–221 (2012). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Derepression of L1 in response to SIRT6 mobilization to DNA damage sites represents a threat to genome stability and may be important in the manifestation of aging.

    “derepression of L1 in response to SIRT6 mobilization to DNA damage sites represents a threat to genome stability and may be important in the manifestation of aging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    KAP1 has been reported to induce silencing of endogenous retroelements in part by coordinating the assembly of a HP1α-SETDB1 dependent co-repressor complex.

    “KAP1 has been reported to induce silencing of endogenous retroelements31 in part by coordinating the assembly of a HP1α-SETDB1 dependent co-repressor complex32.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] Rowe, H. M. et al. KAP1 controls endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells. Nature 463, 237–240 (2010). source
    • cites [32] Sripathy, S. P., Stevens, J. & Schultz, D. C. The KAP1 corepressor functions to coordinate the assembly of de novo HP1-demarcated microenvironments of heterochromatin required for KRAB zinc finger protein-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 8623–8638 (2006). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SIRT6 is a key regulator of mammalian lifespan.

    “Several mouse models have suggested that SIRT6 is a key regulator of mammalian lifespan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] Mostoslavsky, R. et al. Genomic instability and aging-like phenotype in the absence of mammalian SIRT6. Cell 124, 315–329 (2006). source
    • cites [17] Kanfi, Y. et al. SIRT6 protects against pathological damage caused by diet-induced obesity. Aging Cell 9, 162–173 (2010). source
    • cites [18] Kanfi, Y. et al. The sirtuin SIRT6 regulates lifespan in male mice. Nature 483, 218–221 (2012). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    MEFs from SIRT6 KO and WT embryos were subject to an equal number of passages during cell line expansion prior to analysis for new L1 insertions.

    “These cells were subject to an equal number of passages during cell line expansion, prior to analysis for new L1 insertions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Relative protein binding in ChIP was calculated after normalization to input and IgG controls.

    “Relative protein binding was calculated after normalization to input and IgG controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Unique reads were excluded from subsequent analysis of read frequency to exclude reads generated by sequencing error.

    “We excluded these reads from subsequent analysis of read frequency, to exclude any unique reads generated by sequencing error”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Cells expressing a stably integrated L1 5′UTR luciferase reporter were passaged for four weeks to ensure that luciferase signal was generated by stably integrated L1-5′UTR reporter.

    “The cells were passaged for four weeks to ensure that luciferase signal was generated by stably integrated L1-5′UTR reporter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    qRT-PCR values were standardized to housekeeping gene expression (ACTIN and HPRT).

    “Values were standardized to housekeeping gene expression (ACTIN and HPRT); data was analyzed using the comparative CT method.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Luciferase experiments were repeated three times, in triplicate each time.

    “Experiments were repeated three times, in triplicate each time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Primer efficiency for qRT-PCR was verified by linear regression to a standard curve using serial dilutions.

    “Primer efficiency was verified by linear regression to a standard curve using 2, 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, 1/64 and 1/128 dilutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Excluding reads that appeared exactly once has the effect of making the measure of frequency more conservative.

    “This also has the effect of making our measure of frequency more conservative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    qRT-PCR reactions were carried out in quadruplicate.

    “Reactions were carried out in quadruplicate at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 45 s at 95°C and 45s at 60°C and 45 s at 72°C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    An IgG control was used for each ChIP precipitation experiment.

    “an IgG control was used for each precipitation experiment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    All micrococcal nuclease experiments were performed in triplicate.

    “All experiments were performed in triplicate, a representative experiment is shown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Using cell cycle synchronized MEFs derived from littermate embryos that had been subject to the same number of passages reduced potential artifacts generated by DNA replication and differing amounts of cell divisions.

    “By using cell cycle synchronized cells, derived from littermate embryos, that had been subject to the same number of passages, we reduced potential artifacts generated by DNA replication and differing amounts of cell divisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Bisulfite primers did not amplify untreated genomic DNA.

    “As a negative control, we confirmed that these primers did not amplify untreated genomic DNA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Relative genomic ORF2 content was normalized to 5S genomic content.

    “Relative genomic ORF2 content normalized to 5S genomic content.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 5S ribosomal RNA sequence is non-mobile and its genomic content is a valid normalization control for ORF2 genomic content.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Luciferase activity was normalized to the number of cells harvested.

    “Luciferase activity was normalized to the number of cells harvested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The qPCR experiment used 60 wells per sample and was performed three times, with different mice contributing cells for each repeat.

    “60 wells were used for each sample, the experiment was performed three times, with different mice contributing cells for each repeat.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    L1 ORF2 encodes an endonuclease that induces DNA damage when expressed.

    “the L1 ORF2 encodes an endonuclease which, when expressed induces DNA damage”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Massive L1 transcriptional activity can induce mis-regulation of host gene expression and clog the host transcriptional machinery.

    “massive L1 transcriptional activity itself, can induce mis-regulation of gene expression and ‘clog’ the transcriptional machinery of the host”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    L1 retrotransposons are the most active members of the mammalian retrotransposon family.

    “L1 retrotransposons, the most active members of the mammalian retrotransposon family”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    L1 transcription is driven by an internal promoter within the L1 5′UTR.

    “L1 transcription is driven by an internal promoter within the L1 5′UTR.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    KAP1 enforces silencing by facilitating the recruitment of additional silencing factors at the target locus.

    “KAP1 appears to enforce silencing by facilitating the recruitment of additional silencing factors at the target locus.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All antibodies used have previously been verified in ChIP.

    “All antibodies used have previously been verified in ChIP.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ratio of truncated human L1s from prior reports is applicable to the SIRT6 ChIP-seq data and cell types analyzed.

    “Multiple reports have described the ratio of human L1s that are truncated, we used these reports as the basis for adjusting raw read depth to normalized read depth53,54.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 5S ribosomal RNA sequence is non-mobile and its genomic content is a valid normalization control for ORF2 genomic content.

    “Control primers targeted non-mobile 5S ribosomal RNA sequence (Forward: 5′-acggccataccaccctgaa-3′ and Reverse: 5′- ggtctcccatccaagtactaacca-3′).”
    “Relative genomic ORF2 content normalized to 5S genomic content.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SIRT6 promotes L1 silencing by binding to the L1 5′ UTR and mono-ADP ribosylating KAP1, which then recruits HP1a and MeCP2.

    “One possible senescence-independent mechanism involves SIRT6, which promotes L1 silencing by binding to the L1 5’ UTR and mono-ADP ribosylating KAP1, which then recruits additional heterochromatin factors HP1a and MeCP231.”

    From The role of retrotransposable elements in ageing and age-associated diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results report SIRT6 enrichment at the L1 5′ UTR and show that it mono-ADP ribosylates KAP1; the Discussion says this modification is required to recruit HP1α to L1 loci (pages unavailable). The Results also show that MeCP2 is depleted from L1 loci without SIRT6, but do not establish that ribosylated KAP1 recruits MeCP2. The claim overstates that final mechanistic link. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loss of heterochromatin factors reduces heterochromatin at retrotransposons and allows their transcriptional derepression.

    “Loss of these factors reduces heterochromatin at retrotransposons and allows their transcriptional derepression26, 29, 31, 33–35.”
  • SIRT6 relocalizes to DNA damage sites.

    “The upstream stimuli that initiate compromise of surveillance systems are beginning to come into view (for example, SIRT6 relocalization to sites of DNA damage31, or L1 chromatin opening due to TDP-43 relocalization into the cytoplasm130), but our understanding of these mechanisms is still very primitive.”
  • SIRT6 acts as an epigenetic regulator.

    “One such epigenetic regulator is SIRT631.”
  • SIRT6 represses L1 activity by binding to the 5' UTR of L1 elements and promoting heterochromatinization through facilitating interaction of KAP1 with HP1α.

    “SIRT6 represses L1 activity by binding to the 5’ UTR of L1 elements and promotes heterochromatinization by facilitating the interaction of KAP1 with the heterochromatin factor, HP1α, thus rendering L1 elements transcriptionally inactive (Van Meter et al., 2014).”

    From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Van Meter et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1126/science.1192049

    Info

    The cited work was retracted on 2019-04-11 (notice 10.1126/science.aax4558), not before this paper was published (2014-09-23).

    Cited work 10.1126/science.1192049 · retracted 2019-04-11 · notice 10.1126/science.aax4558 · this paper published 2014-09-23

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Meter, M., Kashyap, M., Rezazadeh, S., Geneva, A. J., Morello, T. D., Seluanov, A., & Gorbunova, V.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
  • Seluanov, Andrei
  • Gorbunova, Vera
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-09-23
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
5011-5011
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064802388
Cited by
455
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 1
FWCI
31.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
SIRT6, LINE-1 retrotransposons, KAP1, mono-ADP-ribosylation, heterochromatin, HP1α, transposable elements, aging
MeSH terms
Tripartite Motif-Containing Protein 28, Aging, Animals, Heterochromatin, Luciferases, Nuclear Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Stress, Physiological, Sulfites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review