The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response
Open accessAbstract
Matter structured on a length scale comparable to or smaller than the wavelength of light can exhibit unusual optical properties. Particularly promising components for such materials are metal nanostructures, where structural alterations provide a straightforward means of tailoring their surface plasmon resonances and hence their interaction with light. But the top-down fabrication of plasmonic materials with controlled optical responses in the visible spectral range remains challenging, because lithographic methods are limited in resolution and in their ability to generate genuinely three-dimensional architectures. Molecular self-assembly provides an alternative bottom-up fabrication route not restricted by these limitations, and DNA- and peptide-directed assembly have proved to be viable methods for the controlled arrangement of metal nanoparticles in complex and also chiral geometries. Here we show that DNA origami enables the high-yield production of plasmonic structures that contain nanoparticles arranged in nanometre-scale helices. We find, in agreement with theoretical predictions, that the structures in solution exhibit defined circular dichroism and optical rotatory dispersion effects at visible wavelengths that originate from the collective plasmon–plasmon interactions of the nanoparticles positioned with an accuracy better than two nanometres. Circular dichroism effects in the visible part of the spectrum have been achieved by exploiting the chiral morphology of organic molecules and the plasmonic properties of nanoparticles, or even without precise control over the spatial configuration of the nanoparticles. In contrast, the optical response of our nanoparticle assemblies is rationally designed and tunable in handedness, colour and intensity—in accordance with our theoretical model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens
Pendry, J. B. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3966 · Cited by 12,159
Cited by
Yashima, E., Ousaka, N., Taura, D., Shimomura, K., Ikai, T., & Maeda, K. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00354 · Cited by 2,004
Seeman, N. C., & Sleiman, H. F. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 · Cited by 1,875
Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond
Jones, M. R., Seeman, N. C., & Mirkin, C. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260901 · Cited by 1,347
Using DNA to program the self-assembly of colloidal nanoparticles and microparticles
Rogers, W. B., Shih, W. M., & Manoharan, V. N. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.8 · Cited by 361
Triplex DNA Nanostructures: From Basic Properties to Applications
Hu, Y., Cecconello, A., Idili, A., Ricci, F., & Willner, I. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201701868 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuzyk, A., Schreiber, R., Fan, Z., Pardatscher, G., Roller, E.-M., Högele, A., Simmel, F. C., Govorov, A. O., & Liedl, T.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 483
- Issue
- 7389
- Pages
- 311-314
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2049721533
- Cited by
- 2,216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 58.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10889
- The paper
- Kuzyk, A., Schreiber, R., Fan, Z., Pardatscher, G., Roller, E.-M., Högele, A., Simmel, F. C., Govorov, A. O., & Liedl, T. (2012). DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.