The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A bacteriophage encodes its own CRISPR/Cas adaptive response to evade host innate immunity
Open accessAbstract
Bacteriophages (or phages) are the most abundant biological entities on earth, and are estimated to outnumber their bacterial prey by tenfold. The constant threat of phage predation has led to the evolution of a broad range of bacterial immunity mechanisms that in turn result in the evolution of diverse phage immune evasion strategies, leading to a dynamic co-evolutionary arms race. Although bacterial innate immune mechanisms against phage abound, the only documented bacterial adaptive immune system is the CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated proteins) system, which provides sequence-specific protection from invading nucleic acids, including phage. Here we show a remarkable turn of events, in which a phage-encoded CRISPR/Cas system is used to counteract a phage inhibitory chromosomal island of the bacterial host. A successful lytic infection by the phage is dependent on sequence identity between CRISPR spacers and the target chromosomal island. In the absence of such targeting, the phage-encoded CRISPR/Cas system can acquire new spacers to evolve rapidly and ensure effective targeting of the chromosomal island to restore phage replication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet
Minot, S., Sinha, R., Chen, J., Li, H., Keilbaugh, S. A., Wu, G. D., Lewis, J. D., & Bushman, F. D. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.122705.111 · Cited by 935
Cited by
Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials
Bikard, D., Euler, C. W., Jiang, W., Nussenzweig, P. M., Goldberg, G. W., Duportet, X., Fischetti, V. A., & Marraffini, L. A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3043 · Cited by 986
Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases
Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M., & Lu, T. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3011 · Cited by 808
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Barrangou, R., & Marraffini, L. A. (2014) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.011 · Cited by 832
The CRISPR-Cas immune system: Biology, mechanisms and applications
Rath, D., Amlinger, L., Rath, A., & Lundgren, M. (2015) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.025 · Cited by 471
CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance
Hille, F., & Charpentier, E. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0496 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Seed, K. D., Lazinski, D. W., Calderwood, S. B., & Camilli, A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 494
- Issue
- 7438
- Pages
- 489-491
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1976907618
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.