Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga

Open access
Flot, Jean-François, Hespeels, Boris, Li, Xiang, Noel, Benjamin, Arkhipova, Irina, Danchin, Etienne G. J., Hejnol, Andreas, Henrissat, Bernard, Koszul, Romain, Aury, Jean-Marc, Barbe, Valérie, Barthélémy, Roxane-Marie, Bast, Jens, Bazykin, Georgii A., Chabrol, Olivier, Couloux, Arnaud, Da Rocha, Martine, Da Silva, Corinne, Gladyshev, Eugene, Gouret, Philippe, Hallatschek, Oskar, Hecox-Lea, Bette, Labadie, Karine, Lejeune, Benjamin, Piskurek, Oliver, Poulain, Julie, Rodriguez, Fernando, Ryan, Joseph F., Vakhrusheva, Olga A., Wajnberg, Eric, Wirth, Bénédicte, Yushenova, Irina, Kellis, Manolis, Kondrashov, Alexey S., Mark Welch, David B., Pontarotti, Pierre, Weissenbach, Jean, Wincker, Patrick, Jaillon, Olivier, Van Doninck, Karine·2013·Nature

Abstract

The genome of the asexual rotifer Adineta vaga lacks homologous chromosomes; instead, its allelic regions are rearranged and sometimes found on the same chromosome in a palindromic fashion, a structure reminiscent of the primate Y chromosome and of other mitotic lineages such as cancer cells. Bdelloid rotifers are thought to have persisted and diversified asexually for millions of years, which is odd because loss of sexual reproduction is widely considered to be an evolutionary dead end for metazoans. The suspicion remained that they might engage in sex on rare occasions. But here Olivier Jaillon and colleagues sequence the genome of a bdelloid rotifer, Adineta vaga, and show that its structure is incompatible with conventional meiosis, the type of cell division associated with sexual reproduction. The genome has undergone abundant gene conversion, which may limit the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the absence of meiosis. Up to 8% of the genes are of probable non-metazoan origin, probably acquired through horizontal gene transfer. These findings demonstrate positive evidence for asexual evolution, supporting the hypothesis of ancient asexuality among bdelloid rotifers. Loss of sexual reproduction is considered an evolutionary dead end for metazoans, but bdelloid rotifers challenge this view as they appear to have persisted asexually for millions of years1. Neither male sex organs nor meiosis have ever been observed in these microscopic animals: oocytes are formed through mitotic divisions, with no reduction of chromosome number and no indication of chromosome pairing2. However, current evidence does not exclude that they may engage in sex on rare, cryptic occasions. Here we report the genome of a bdelloid rotifer, Adineta vaga (Davis, 1873)3, and show that its structure is incompatible with conventional meiosis. At gene scale, the genome of A. vaga is tetraploid and comprises both anciently duplicated segments and less divergent allelic regions. However, in contrast to sexual species, the allelic regions are rearranged and sometimes even found on the same chromosome. Such structure does not allow meiotic pairing; instead, we find abundant evidence of gene conversion, which may limit the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the absence of meiosis. Gene families involved in resistance to oxidation, carbohydrate metabolism and defence against transposons are significantly expanded, which may explain why transposable elements cover only 3% of the assembled sequence. Furthermore, 8% of the genes are likely to be of non-metazoan origin and were probably acquired horizontally. This apparent convergence between bdelloids and prokaryotes sheds new light on the evolutionary significance of sex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12326

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Flot, J.-F., Hespeels, B., Li, X., Noel, B., Arkhipova, I., Danchin, E. G. J., Hejnol, A., Henrissat, B., Koszul, R., Aury, J.-M., Barbe, V., Barthélémy, R.-M., Bast, J., Bazykin, G. A., Chabrol, O., Couloux, A., Da Rocha, M., Da Silva, C., Gladyshev, E., Gouret, P., Hallatschek, O., Hecox-Lea, B., Labadie, K., Lejeune, B., Piskurek, O., Poulain, J., Rodriguez, F., Ryan, J. F., Vakhrusheva, O. A., Wajnberg, E., Wirth, B., Yushenova, I., Kellis, M., Kondrashov, A. S., Mark Welch, D. B., Pontarotti, P., Weissenbach, J., Wincker, P., Jaillon, O., & Van Doninck, K.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-07-21
Volume
500
Issue
7463
Pages
453-457
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2067829962
Cited by
384
References
29
FWCI
41.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature12326
The paper
Flot, J.-F., Hespeels, B., Li, X., Noel, B., Arkhipova, I., Danchin, E. G. J., Hejnol, A., Henrissat, B., Koszul, R., Aury, J.-M., Barbe, V., Barthélémy, R.-M., Bast, J., Bazykin, G. A., Chabrol, O., Couloux, A., Da Rocha, M., Da Silva, C., Gladyshev, E., . . . Van Doninck, K. (2013). Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12326

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.