CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance

Sasaki, Toshihiko, Yamamoto, Yoshihisa, Koashi, Masato·2014·Nature
DOI 10.1038/nature13303
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13303

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several specific quantum optical implementations rely on the HOM effect, including solving systems of linear equations, computation on encrypted data, computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform, and computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes.

    “There are several examples of specific quantum optical implementations that rely on the HOM effect, to list a few: solving systems of linear equations [128,129], computation on encrypted data [130], computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform [131], and computations on a single spatial mode (using temporal modes) [132].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [129]

    The Abstract describes a quantum key distribution protocol using laser pulse trains, and the practical-implementation description in Additional information describes interference between delayed pulses. Neither passage addresses the HOM effect or computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes. Searches for HOM-based computation, linear equations, encrypted data, and Fourier transforms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing 175–179 (IEEE Press, 1984)
  2. Bennett, C. H. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121–3124 (1992) · DOI
  3. Bruß, D. Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3018–3021 (1998) · DOI
  4. Scarani, V., Acín, A., Ribordy, G. & Gisin, N. Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulse implementations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057901 (2004) · DOI
  5. Stucki, D., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Scarani, V. & Zbinden, H. Fast and simple one-way quantum key distribution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 194108 (2005) · DOI
  6. Inoue, K., Waks, E. & Yamamoto, Y. Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution using coherent light. Phys. Rev. A 68, 022317 (2003) · DOI
  7. Grosshans, F. & Grangier, P. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057902 (2002) · DOI
  8. Cai, R. Y. & Scarani, V. Finite-key analysis for practical implementations of quantum key distribution. New J. Phys. 11, 045024 (2009) · DOI
  9. Hayashi, M. & Nakayama, R. Security analysis of the decoy method with the Bennett-Brassard 1984 protocol for finite key lengths. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4139 (2013) · DOI
  10. Koashi, M. Simple security proof of quantum key distribution based on complementarity. New J. Phys. 11, 045018 (2009) · DOI
  11. Hwang, W.-Y. Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057901 (2003) · DOI
  12. Lo, H.-K., Ma, X. & Chen, K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Wang, X.-B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230503 (2005) · DOI
  14. Shor, P. W. & Preskill, J. Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 441–444 (2000) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Pawlowski, M. et al. Information causality as a physical principle. Nature 461, 1101–1104 (2009) · DOI
  16. Takesue, H. et al. Quantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors. Nature Photon. 1, 343–348 (2007) · DOI
  17. Tamaki, K., Koashi, M. & Kato, G. Unconditional security of coherent-state-based differential phase shift quantum key distribution protocol with block-wise phase randomization. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1995 (2012) · arXiv
  18. Mayers, D. Unconditional security in quantum cryptography. J. ACM 48, 351–406 (2001) · DOI
  19. Hayashi, M. & Tsurumaru, T. Concise and tight security analysis of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 protocol with finite key lengths. New J. Phys. 14, 093014 (2012) · DOI
  20. Tomamichel, M., Lim, C. C. W., Gisin, N. & Renner, R. Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography. Nature Commun. 3, 634 (2012) · DOI
  21. Bourgoin, J. et al. A comprehensive design and performance analysis of low earth orbit satellite quantum communication. New J. Phys. 15, 023006 (2013) · DOI
  22. Nauerth, S. et al. Air-to-ground quantum communication. Nature Photon. 7, 382–386 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  23. He, Y.-M. et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nature Nanotechnol. 8, 213–217 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Yuan, Z. et al. Electrically driven single-photon source. Science 295, 102–105 (2002) · DOI
  25. Claudon, J. et al. A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nature Photon. 4, 174–177 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Huttner, B., Imoto, N., Gisin, N. & Mor, T. Quantum cryptography with coherent states. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1863–1869 (1995) · DOI
  27. Brassard, G., Lütkenhaus, N., Mor, T. & Sanders, B. C. Limitations on practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1330–1333 (2000) · DOI
  28. Gottesman, D., Lo, H.-K., Lütkenhaus, N. & Preskill, J. Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect device. Quant. Inf. Comput. 4, 325 (2004)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, Y., & Koashi, M.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-05-21
Volume
509
Issue
7501
Pages
475-478
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/nature13303
Cited by
315
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review