The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA
Open accessAbstract
CRISPR–Cas (clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats coupled with CRISPR-associated proteins) is a bacterial immunity system that protects against invading phages or plasmids. In the process of CRISPR adaptation, short pieces of DNA (‘spacers’) are acquired from foreign elements and integrated into the CRISPR array. So far, it has remained a mystery how spacers are preferentially acquired from the foreign DNA while the self chromosome is avoided. Here we show that spacer acquisition is replication-dependent, and that DNA breaks formed at stalled replication forks promote spacer acquisition. Chromosomal hotspots of spacer acquisition were confined by Chi sites, which are sequence octamers highly enriched on the bacterial chromosome, suggesting that these sites limit spacer acquisition from self DNA. We further show that the avoidance of self is mediated by the RecBCD double-stranded DNA break repair complex. Our results suggest that, in Escherichia coli, acquisition of new spacers largely depends on RecBCD-mediated processing of double-stranded DNA breaks occurring primarily at replication forks, and that the preference for foreign DNA is achieved through the higher density of Chi sites on the self chromosome, in combination with the higher number of forks on the foreign DNA. This model explains the strong preference to acquire spacers both from high copy plasmids and from phages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection
Baba, T., Ara, T., Hasegawa, M., Takai, Y., Okumura, Y., Baba, M., Datsenko, K. A., Tomita, M., Wanner, B. L., & Mori, H. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100050 · Cited by 7,858
RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea
Wiedenheft, B., Sternberg, S. H., & Doudna, J. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10886 · Cited by 1,851
CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea
Sorek, R., Lawrence, C. M., & Wiedenheft, B. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-072911-172315 · Cited by 668
Cited by
Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering
Wright, A. V., Nuñez, J. K., & Doudna, J. A. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035 · Cited by 989
CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes
Marraffini, L. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15386 · Cited by 829
The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource
Bernheim, A., & Sorek, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0278-2 · Cited by 675
Self-citationThe CRISPR-Cas immune system: Biology, mechanisms and applications
Rath, D., Amlinger, L., Rath, A., & Lundgren, M. (2015) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.025 · Cited by 471
CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance
Hille, F., & Charpentier, E. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0496 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, A., Goren, M. G., Yosef, I., Auster, O., Manor, M., Amitai, G., Edgar, R., Qimron, U., & Sorek, R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-04-13
- Volume
- 520
- Issue
- 7548
- Pages
- 505-510
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2132440004
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature14302
- The paper
- Levy, A., Goren, M. G., Yosef, I., Auster, O., Manor, M., Amitai, G., Edgar, R., Qimron, U., & Sorek, R. (2015). CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.