Cited by 288Forensic and Genetic ResearchPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man

Open access
Rasmussen, Morten, Sikora, Martin, Albrechtsen, Anders, Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand, Moreno-Mayar, J. Víctor, Poznik, G. David, Zollikofer, Christoph P. E., Ponce de León, Marcia S. +11 more·2015·Nature

Abstract

Kennewick Man, a 8,500-year-old male human skeleton discovered in Washington state, USA, has been the subject of scientific and legal controversy; here a DNA analysis shows that Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other extant population worldwide. Kennewick Man is a 9,000-year-old male human skeleton discovered in Washington state, USA in 1996. The population affinities of the remains have been the subject of scientific and legal controversy. Initial studies based on morphology suggested that the skeleton was not of Native American affinity. Eske Willerslev and colleagues now present DNA analysis showing that Kennewick Man is in fact closer to modern Native Americans than to any other extant population worldwide. Kennewick Man, referred to as the Ancient One by Native Americans, is a male human skeleton discovered in Washington state (USA) in 1996 and initially radiocarbon dated to 8,340–9,200 calibrated years before present (bp)1. His population affinities have been the subject of scientific debate and legal controversy. Based on an initial study of cranial morphology it was asserted that Kennewick Man was neither Native American nor closely related to the claimant Plateau tribes of the Pacific Northwest, who claimed ancestral relationship and requested repatriation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The morphological analysis was important to judicial decisions that Kennewick Man was not Native American and that therefore NAGPRA did not apply. Instead of repatriation, additional studies of the remains were permitted2. Subsequent craniometric analysis affirmed Kennewick Man to be more closely related to circumpacific groups such as the Ainu and Polynesians than he is to modern Native Americans2. In order to resolve Kennewick Man’s ancestry and affiliations, we have sequenced his genome to ∼1× coverage and compared it to worldwide genomic data including for the Ainu and Polynesians. We find that Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide. Among the Native American groups for whom genome-wide data are available for comparison, several seem to be descended from a population closely related to that of Kennewick Man, including the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville), one of the five tribes claiming Kennewick Man. We revisit the cranial analyses and find that, as opposed to genome-wide comparisons, it is not possible on that basis to affiliate Kennewick Man to specific contemporary groups. We therefore conclude based on genetic comparisons that Kennewick Man shows continuity with Native North Americans over at least the last eight millennia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature14625

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kennewick man was found to be genetically closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide, showing continuity with Native North Americans over at least the past eight millennia, despite morphological difference.

    “Kennewick man, as the skeleton came to be known, was recently sequenced and found to be genetically closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide, therefore showing continuity with Native North Americans over at least the past eight millennia, despite the difference in morphology [35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Owsley DW Jantz RL Kennewick Man 2014 Texas A&M University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasmussen, M., Sikora, M., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T. S., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Poznik, G. D., Zollikofer, C. P. E., Ponce de León, M. S., Allentoft, M. E., Moltke, I., Jónsson, H., Valdiosera, C., Malhi, R. S., Orlando, L., Bustamante, C. D., Stafford, T. W., Meltzer, D. J., Nielsen, R., & Willerslev, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
Corresponding author
Willerslev, Eske
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-06-18
Volume
523
Issue
7561
Pages
455-458
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1588626794
Cited by
288
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 10
FWCI
23.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1147470)
  • University of Washington
  • Villum Fonden (00010120, 00007171)
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DGE-1147470)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R109-2012-9995, R70-2010-6286, R155-2013-16338, R38-2008-3048, R24-2008-2527)
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007033)
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
Kennewick Man, Native American ancestry, ancient DNA, genome sequencing, skull morphology, Ainu, Polynesians, population affinity, skeletal remains, genetic admixture
MeSH terms
Americas, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Phylogeny, Skeleton, Skull, Washington, Genome, Human, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review