CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic evidence for two founding populations of the Americas

Skoglund, Pontus, Mallick, Swapan, Bortolini, Maria Cátira, Chennagiri, Niru, Hünemeier, Tábita, Petzl-Erler, Maria Luiza, Salzano, Francisco Mauro, Patterson, Nick, Reich, David·2015·Nature
DOI 10.1038/nature14895PMC PMC4982469
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature14895

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial peopling of the Americas occurred before the appearance of the Clovis complex, dated to ~13,000 cal yr B.P.

    “Genetic studies of modern Native Americans and ancient human skeletons indicate that the initial peopling of the Americas occurred before the appearance of the Clovis complex, dated to ~13,000 calendar years before the present (cal yr B.P.) (1, 2), but this interpretation requires confirmation by empirical archaeological evidence.”

    From Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas (2016) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Wang, S. et al. Genetic variation and population structure in Native Americans. PLoS Genet. 3, e185 (2007) · DOI
  2. Reich, D. et al. Reconstructing Native American population history. Nature 488, 370–374 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Neves, W. & Pucciarelli, H. The origins of the first Americans—an analysis based on the cranial morphology of early South American remains. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 81, 274 (1990)
  4. Neves, W. et al. Early Holocene human skeletal remains from Cerca Grande, Lagoa Santa, Central Brazil, and the origins of the first Americans. World Archaeol. 36, 479–501 (2004) · DOI
  5. Neves, W. A., Prous, A., González-José, R., Kipnis, R. & Powell, J. Early Holocene human skeletal remains from Santana do Riacho, Brazil: implications for the settlement of the New World. J. Hum. Evol. 45, 19–42 (2003) · DOI
  6. González‐José, R. et al. Late Pleistocene/Holocene craniofacial morphology in Mesoamerican Paleoindians: implications for the peopling of the New World. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128, 772–780 (2005) · DOI
  7. Gilbert, M. T. P. et al. DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science 320, 786–789 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chatters, J. C. et al. Late Pleistocene human skeleton and mtDNA link Paleoamericans and modern Native Americans. Science 344, 750–754 (2014) · DOI
  9. Jantz, R. L. & Owsley, D. W. Variation among early North American crania. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 114, 146–155 (2001) · DOI
  10. Neves, W. A., Hubbe, M. & Correal, G. Human skeletal remains from Sabana de Bogota, Colombia: a case of Paleoamerican morphology late survival in South America? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 133, 1080–1098 (2007) · DOI
  11. González-José, R. et al. Craniometric evidence for Palaeoamerican survival in Baja California. Nature 425, 62–65 (2003) · DOI
  12. Sparks, C. S. & Jantz, R. L. A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14636–14639 (2002) · DOI
  13. Relethford, J. H. Apportionment of global human genetic diversity based on craniometrics and skin color. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 118, 393–398 (2002) · DOI
  14. Qin, P. & Stoneking, M. Denisovan ancestry in East Eurasian and Native American populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. (2015) · DOI
  15. Green, R. E. et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gillespie, J. H. Genetic drift in an infinite population: the pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155, 909–919 (2000) · DOI
  17. Moorjani, P. et al. The history of African gene flow into Southern Europeans, Levantines, and Jews. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001373 (2011) · DOI
  18. Hellenthal, G. et al. A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science 343, 747–751 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  19. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Busing, F. M., Meijer, E. & Van Der Leeden, R. Delete-m jackknife for unequal m. Stat. Comput. 9, 3–8 (1999) · DOI
  21. Robbins, R. B. Some applications of mathematics to breeding problems III. Genetics 3, 375–389 (1918) · DOI
  22. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Skoglund, P., Mallick, S., Bortolini, M. C., Chennagiri, N., Hünemeier, T., Petzl-Erler, M. L., Salzano, F. M., Patterson, N., & Reich, D.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
525
Issue
7567
Pages
104-108
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/nature14895
PMC
PMC4982469
Cited by
365
References
14
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review