Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The phylogenetic roots of human lethal violence

Gómez, José María, Verdú, Miguel, González-Megías, Adela, Méndez, Marcos·2016·Nature
DOI 10.1038/nature19758
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The psychological, sociological and evolutionary roots of conspecific violence in humans are still debated, despite attracting the attention of intellectuals for over two millennia. Here we propose a conceptual approach towards understanding these roots based on the assumption that aggression in mammals, including humans, has a significant phylogenetic component. By compiling sources of mortality from a comprehensive sample of mammals, we assessed the percentage of deaths due to conspecifics and, using phylogenetic comparative tools, predicted this value for humans. The proportion of human deaths phylogenetically predicted to be caused by interpersonal violence stood at 2%. This value was similar to the one phylogenetically inferred for the evolutionary ancestor of primates and apes, indicating that a certain level of lethal violence arises owing to our position within the phylogeny of mammals. It was also similar to the percentage seen in prehistoric bands and tribes, indicating that we were as lethally violent then as common mammalian evolutionary history would predict. However, the level of lethal violence has changed through human history and can be associated with changes in the socio-political organization of human populations. Our study provides a detailed phylogenetic and historical context against which to compare levels of lethal violence observed throughout our history.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature19758

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Kelly, R. C. The evolution of lethal intergroup violence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15294–15298 (2005) · DOI
  2. Archer, J. The nature of human aggression. Int. J. Law Psychiatry. 32, 202–208 (2009) · DOI
  3. Wrangham, R. W. & Glowacki, L. Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers: evaluating the chimpanzee model. Hum. Nat. 23, 5–29 (2012) · DOI
  4. Fry, D. P. & Söderberg, P. Lethal aggression in mobile forager bands and implications for the origins of war. Science 341, 270–273 (2013) · DOI
  5. Sussman, R. W. in War, Peace, and Human Nature: the Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (ed. Fry, D. P. ) 97–111 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013) · DOI
  6. Martin, D. L. & Harrod, R. P. Bioarchaeological contributions to the study of violence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 156, (Suppl. 59), 116–145 (2015) · DOI
  7. Keeley, L. H. War Before Civilization (Oxford Univ. Press, 1996)
  8. Pinker, S. The Better Angels of our Nature (Viking Press, 2011)
  9. Ferguson, R. B. in War, Peace, and Human Nature: the Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (ed. Fry, D. P. ) 191–240 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013) · DOI
  10. Anholt, R. R. H. & Mackay, T. F. C. Genetics of aggression. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 145–164 (2012) · DOI
  11. Huber, R. & Brennan, P. A. Aggression. Adv. Genet. 75, 1–6 (2011) · DOI
  12. Low, B. S. Why Sex Matters: a Darwinian Look at Human Behavior (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010)
  13. Packer, C. & Pusey, A. E. in Infanticide, Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives (eds Hausfater, G. & Hrdy, S. B. ) 31–42 (Aldine Transactions, 1984)
  14. Cubaynes, S. et al. Density-dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus). J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 1344–1356 (2014) · DOI
  15. Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A. & Hess, W. R. A survey of intraspecific predation within the class Mammalia. Mammal Rev. 14, 187–198 (1984) · DOI
  16. Lukas, D. & Huchard, E. Sexual conflict. The evolution of infanticide by males in mammalian societies. Science 346, 841–844 (2014) · DOI
  17. Archer, J. The Behavioural Biology of Aggression (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984)
  18. Faurby, S. & Svenning, J. C. A species-level phylogeny of all extant and late Quaternary extinct mammals using a novel heuristic-hierarchical Bayesian approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 84, 14–26 (2015) · DOI
  19. Opie, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Dunbar, R. I. & Shultz, S. Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13328–13332 (2013) · DOI
  20. Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A. R. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155, 346–364 (2000) · DOI
  21. Goberna, M. & Verdú, M. Predicting microbial traits with phylogenies. ISME J. 10, 959–967 (2016) · DOI
  22. Shaw, I. & Jameson, R. A Dictionary of Archaeology (Blackwell, 1999) · DOI
  23. Johnson, A. W. & Earle, T. K. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State (Stanford Univ. Press, 2000) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Allen, M. W. & Jones, T. L. Violence and Warfare Among Hunter–Gatherers (Left Coast Press, 2014)
  25. Abrutyn, S. & Lawrence, K. From chiefdom to state: toward an integrative theory of the evolution of polity. Sociol. Perspect. 53, 419–442 (2010) · DOI
  26. Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 2nd–3rd edn. (Smithsonian Institution Press / John Hopkins Univ. Press, 1993–2005)
  27. Finlayson, C. et al. Late survival of Neanderthals at the southernmost extreme of Europe. Nature 443, 850–853 (2006) · DOI
  28. Arsuaga, J. L. et al. Neandertal roots: Cranial and chronological evidence from Sima de los Huesos. Science 344, 1358–1363 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hublin, J. J. The origin of Neandertals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16022–16027 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mays, S. The Archaeology of Human Bones (Routledge, 2010) · DOI
  31. Milner, G. R. Nineteenth-century arrow wounds and perceptions of prehistoric warfare. Am. Antiq. 70, 144–156 (2005) · DOI
  32. War, peace, and human nature: the Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (ed. Fry, D. P. ) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013)
  33. Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999) · DOI · Paper page
  34. Münkemüller, T. et al. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 743–756 (2012) · DOI
  35. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  36. Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012) · DOI
  37. Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712–726 (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  38. Martins, E. P. & Hansen, T. F. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149, 646–667 (1997) · DOI
  39. Kembel, S. W., Wu, M., Eisen, J. A. & Green, J. L. Incorporating 16S gene copy number information improves estimates of microbial diversity and abundance. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002743 (2012) · DOI
  40. Nunn, C. & Zhu, L. in Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and their Application in Evolutionary Biology (ed. Garamszegi, L. Z. ) 481–514 (Springer, 2014) · DOI
  41. Piñeiro, G., Perelman, S., Guerschman, J. P. & Paruelo, J. M. How to evaluate models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecol. Modell. 216, 316–322 (2008) · DOI

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Gómez, J. M., Verdú, M., González-Megías, A., & Méndez, M.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-09-28
Volume
538
Issue
7624
Pages
233-237
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/nature19758
Cited by
164
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review