The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications
Open accessAbstract
Chromosome conformation capture methods have identified subchromosomal structures of higher-order chromatin interactions called topologically associated domains (TADs) that are separated from each other by boundary regions. By subdividing the genome into discrete regulatory units, TADs restrict the contacts that enhancers establish with their target genes. However, the mechanisms that underlie partitioning of the genome into TADs remain poorly understood. Here we show by chromosome conformation capture (capture Hi-C and 4C-seq methods) that genomic duplications in patient cells and genetically modified mice can result in the formation of new chromatin domains (neo-TADs) and that this process determines their molecular pathology. Duplications of non-coding DNA within the mouse Sox9 TAD (intra-TAD) that cause female to male sex reversal in humans, showed increased contact of the duplicated regions within the TAD, but no change in the overall TAD structure. In contrast, overlapping duplications that extended over the next boundary into the neighbouring TAD (inter-TAD), resulted in the formation of a new chromatin domain (neo-TAD) that was isolated from the rest of the genome. As a consequence of this insulation, inter-TAD duplications had no phenotypic effect. However, incorporation of the next flanking gene, Kcnj2, in the neo-TAD resulted in ectopic contacts of Kcnj2 with the duplicated part of the Sox9 regulatory region, consecutive misexpression of Kcnj2, and a limb malformation phenotype. Our findings provide evidence that TADs are genomic regulatory units with a high degree of internal stability that can be sculptured by structural genomic variations. This process is important for the interpretation of copy number variations, as these variations are routinely detected in diagnostic tests for genetic disease and cancer. This finding also has relevance in an evolutionary setting because copy-number differences are thought to have a crucial role in the evolution of genome complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, the integrity of the domain structures is important for the proper regulation of genes8–12.”
From Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110 · Cited by 27,895
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895
Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions
Lupiáñez, D. G., Kraft, K., Heinrich, V., Krawitz, P., Brancati, F., Klopocki, E., Horn, D., Kayserili, H., Opitz, J. M., Laxova, R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 · Cited by 2,132
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nora, E. P., Goloborodko, A., Valton, A.-L., Gibcus, J. H., Uebersohn, A., Abdennur, N., Dekker, J., Mirny, L. A., & Bruneau, B. G. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.004 · Cited by 1,709
Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control
Schoenfelder, S., & Fraser, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 · Cited by 1,102
A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics
Collins, R. L., Brand, H., Karczewski, K. J., Zhao, X., Alföldi, J., Francioli, L. C., Khera, A. V., Lowther, C., Gauthier, L. D., Wang, H., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2287-8 · Cited by 1,037
Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition
Flyamer, I. M., Gassler, J., Imakaev, M., Brandão, H. B., Ulianov, S. V., Abdennur, N., Razin, S. V., Mirny, L. A., & Tachibana-Konwalski, K. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21711 · Cited by 753
Structural variation in the 3D genome
Spielmann, M., Lupiáñez, D. G., & Mundlos, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0007-0 · Cited by 752
Self-citationThe role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation
Zheng, H., & Xie, W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0132-4 · Cited by 742
Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology
Furlong, E. E. M., & Levine, M. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0320 · Cited by 641
Structural variation in the sequencing era
Ho, S. S., Urban, A. E., & Mills, R. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0180-9 · Cited by 630
Principles of genome folding into topologically associating domains
Szabo, Q., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw1668 · Cited by 631
Ke, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, X., Feng, S., Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Yao, X., Li, F., Zhu, W. Z., Gao, L., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.029 · Cited by 531
Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture
Kempfer, R., & Pombo, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0195-2 · Cited by 533
Self-citationDynamic interplay between enhancer–promoter topology and gene activity
Chen, H., Levo, M., Barinov, L., Fujioka, M., Jaynes, J. B., & Gregor, T. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0175-z · Cited by 483
Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes
Dixon, J. R., Xu, J., Dileep, V., Zhan, Y., Song, F., Le, V. T., Yardımcı, G. G., Chakraborty, A., Bann, D. V., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0195-8 · Cited by 452
Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods
Jerković, I., & Cavalli, G. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00362-w · Cited by 413
Self-citationAn atlas of dynamic chromatin landscapes in mouse fetal development
Gorkin, D. U., Barozzi, I., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, H., Lee, A. Y., Li, B., Chiou, J., Wildberg, A., Ding, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2093-3 · Cited by 374
A mechanism of cohesin‐dependent loop extrusion organizes zygotic genome architecture
Gassler, J., Brandão, H. B., Imakaev, M., Flyamer, I. M., Ladstätter, S., Bickmore, W. A., Peters, J., Mirny, L. A., & Tachibana, K.-E. K. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798083 · Cited by 382
Zhang, Y., Li, T., Preißl, S., Amaral, M. L., Grinstein, J. D., Farah, E. N., Destici, E., Qiu, Y., Hu, R., Lee, A. Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0479-7 · Cited by 384
The Three-Dimensional Organization of Mammalian Genomes
Yu, M., & Ren, B. (2017) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060531 · Cited by 373
On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains
Beagan, J. A., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0561-1 · Cited by 381
Redin, C., Brand, H., Collins, R. L., Kammin, T., Mitchell, E., Hodge, J. C., Hanscom, C., Pillalamarri, V., Seabra, C. M., Abbott, M.-A., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3720 · Cited by 334
Highly rearranged chromosomes reveal uncoupling between genome topology and gene expression
Ghavi-Helm, Y., Jankowski, A., Meiers, S., Viales, R. R., Korbel, J. O., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0462-3 · Cited by 354
The relationship between genome structure and function
Oudelaar, A. M., & Higgs, D. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00303-x · Cited by 304
Despang, A., Schöpflin, R., Franke, M., Ali, S., Jerković, I., Paliou, C., Chan, W.-L., Timmermann, B., Wittler, L., Vingron, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0466-z · Cited by 321
Self-citationIncomplete Penetrance and Variable Expressivity: From Clinical Studies to Population Cohorts
Kingdom, R., & Wright, C. F. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.920390 · Cited by 326
Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer
Akdemir, K. C., Le, V. T., Chandran, S., Li, Y., Verhaak, R. G., Beroukhim, R., Campbell, P. J., Chin, L., Dixon, J. R., Futreal, P. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0564-y · Cited by 283
SOX9 in cartilage development and disease
Lefebvre, V., Angelozzi, M., & Haseeb, A. (2019) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2019.07.008 · Cited by 226
Kruse, K., Hug, C. B., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02215-9 · Cited by 242
Polycomb-Dependent Chromatin Looping Contributes to Gene Silencing during Drosophila Development
Ogiyama, Y., Schuettengruber, B., Papadopoulos, G. L., Chang, J., & Cavalli, G. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.032 · Cited by 248
Transcriptional Dysregulation of MYC Reveals Common Enhancer-Docking Mechanism
Schuijers, J., Manteiga, J. C., Weintraub, A. S., Day, D. S., Zamudio, A. V., Hnisz, D., Lee, T. I., & Young, R. A. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.056 · Cited by 232
Polymer physics predicts the effects of structural variants on chromatin architecture
Bianco, S., Lupiáñez, D. G., Chiariello, A. M., Annunziatella, C., Kraft, K., Schöpflin, R., Wittler, L., Andrey, G., Vingron, M., Pombo, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0098-8 · Cited by 215
Self-citationEnhancer hijacking determines extrachromosomal circular MYCN amplicon architecture in neuroblastoma
Helmsauer, K., Valieva, M. E., Ali, S., González, R. C., Schöpflin, R., Röefzaad, C., Bei, Y., García, H. D., Rodríguez-Fos, E., Puiggròs, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19452-y · Cited by 229
Self-citationZhan, Y., Mariani, L., Barozzi, I., Schulz, E. G., Blüthgen, N., Stadler, M. B., Tiana, G., & Giorgetti, L. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.212803.116 · Cited by 214
Coolpup.py: versatile pile-up analysis of Hi-C data
Flyamer, I. M., Illingworth, R. S., & Bickmore, W. A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa073 · Cited by 220
Catarino, R. R., & Stark, A. (2018) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.310367.117 · Cited by 215
McCord, R. P., Kaplan, N., & Giorgetti, L. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.021 · Cited by 220
Regulatory Landscaping: How Enhancer-Promoter Communication Is Sculpted in 3D
Robson, M. I., Ringel, A. R., & Mundlos, S. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.032 · Cited by 203
Self-citationDosage sensitivity is a major determinant of human copy number variant pathogenicity
Rice, A. M., & McLysaght, A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14366 · Cited by 193
Shou, J., Li, J., Liu, Y., & Wu, Q. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.021 · Cited by 192
Dynamic 3D chromatin architecture contributes to enhancer specificity and limb morphogenesis
Kragesteen, B. K., Spielmann, M., Paliou, C., Heinrich, V., Schöpflin, R., Esposito, A., Annunziatella, C., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., Jerković, I., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0221-x · Cited by 190
Self-citationLimb development: a paradigm of gene regulation
Petit, F., Sears, K. E., & Ahituv, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.167 · Cited by 198
Huang, H., Zhu, Q., Jussila, A., Han, Y., Bintu, B., Kern, C., Conte, M., Zhang, Y., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00863-6 · Cited by 187
Sequence-based modeling of three-dimensional genome architecture from kilobase to chromosome scale
Zhou, J. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01065-4 · Cited by 177
Ron, G., Globerson, Y., Moran, D., & Kaplan, T. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02386-3 · Cited by 188
Preformed chromatin topology assists transcriptional robustness of Shh during limb development
Paliou, C., Guckelberger, P., Schöpflin, R., Heinrich, V., Esposito, A., Chiariello, A. M., Bianco, S., Annunziatella, C., Helmuth, J., Haas, S., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900672116 · Cited by 163
Self-citationBertero, A., Fields, P., Ramani, V., Bonora, G., Yardımcı, G. G., Reinecke, H., Pabon, L., Noble, W. S., Shendure, J., & Murry, C. E. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09483-5 · Cited by 168
Loss of Extreme Long-Range Enhancers in Human Neural Crest Drives a Craniofacial Disorder
Long, H. K., Osterwalder, M., Welsh, I. C., Hansen, K. L., Davies, J. O. J., Liu, Y. E., Koska, M., Adams, A. T., Aho, R., Arora, N., et al. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.09.001 · Cited by 166
Krefting, J., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., & Ibn-Salem, J. (2018) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-018-0556-x · Cited by 169
A compendium and comparative epigenomics analysis of cis-regulatory elements in the pig genome
Zhao, Y., Hou, Y., Xu, Y., Luan, Y., Zhou, H., Qi, X., Hu, M., Wang, D., Wang, Z., Fu, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22448-x · Cited by 169
Achinger-Kawecka, J., Valdés-Mora, F., Luu, P.-L., Giles, K., Caldon, C. E., Qu, W., Nair, S., Soto, S., Locke, W. J., Yeo-Teh, N. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14098-x · Cited by 136
Kmt1e regulates a large neuron-specific topological chromatin domain
Jiang, Y., Loh, Y., Rajarajan, P., Hirayama, T., Liao, W., Kassim, B. S., Javidfar, B., Hartley, B., Kleofas, L., Park, R. B., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3906 · Cited by 128
Topologically associating domain boundaries are required for normal genome function
Rajderkar, S., Barozzi, I., Zhu, Y., Hu, R., Zhang, Y., Li, B., Alcaina‐Caro, A., Fukuda-Yuzawa, Y., Kelman, G., Akeza, A., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04819-w · Cited by 172
How subtle changes in 3D structure can create large changes in transcription
Xiao, J. Y., Hafner, A., & Boettiger, A. N. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64320 · Cited by 162
Hi-C analyses with GENOVA: a case study with cohesin variants
van der Weide, R. H., van den Brand, T., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Teunissen, H., Rowland, B. D., & de Wit, E. (2021) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqab040 · Cited by 161
Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning
Ing-Simmons, E., Vaid, R., Bing, X. Y., Levine, M., Mannervik, M., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00799-x · Cited by 159
HiCcompare: an R-package for joint normalization and comparison of HI-C datasets
Stansfield, J. C., Cresswell, K. G., Vladimirov, V. I., & Dozmorov, M. G. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2288-x · Cited by 149
Wang, X., Xu, J., Zhang, B., Hou, Y., Song, F., Lyu, H., & Yue, F. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01164-w · Cited by 152
Wang, X., Luan, Y., & Yue, F. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn9215 · Cited by 148
Greenwald, W. W. Y., Li, H., Benaglio, P., Jakubosky, D. A., Matsui, H., Schmitt, A. D., Selvaraj, S., D’Antonio, M., D’Antonio‐Chronowska, A., Smith, E. N., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08940-5 · Cited by 144
Kraft, K., Magg, A., Heinrich, V., Riemenschneider, C., Schöpflin, R., Markowski, J., Ibrahim, D. M., Acuña‐Hidalgo, R., Despang, A., Andrey, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0273-x · Cited by 139
Self-citationBioelectric signaling as a unique regulator of development and regeneration
Harris, M. P. (2021) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.180794 · Cited by 139
A promoter interaction map for cardiovascular disease genetics
Montefiori, L. E., Sobreira, D. R., Sakabe, N. J., Aneas, I., Joslin, A. C., Hansen, G. T., Bozek, G., Moskowitz, I. P., McNally, E. M., & Nóbrega, M. A. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.35788 · Cited by 145
Developing in 3D: the role of CTCF in cell differentiation
Arzate‐Mejía, R. G., Targa, F. R., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.137729 · Cited by 144
Gene Regulatory Elements, Major Drivers of Human Disease
Chatterjee, S., & Ahituv, N. (2017) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035537 · Cited by 144
An evolving view of copy number variants
Lauer, S. L., & Gresham, D. (2019) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-019-00980-0 · Cited by 137
Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations
Williamson, I., Kane, L., Devenney, P. S., Flyamer, I. M., Anderson, E., Kilanowski, F. M., Hill, R. E., Bickmore, W. A., & Lettice, L. A. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.179523 · Cited by 148
Wu, P., Li, T., Li, R., Jia, L., Zhu, P., Liu, Y., Chen, Q., Tang, D., Yu, Y., & Li, C. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01793-w · Cited by 130
Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair effects on 3D genome organization
Sanders, J. T., Freeman, T. F., Xu, Y., Golloshi, R., Stallard, M. A., Hill, A. M., San Martin, R., Balajee, A. S., & McCord, R. P. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20047-w · Cited by 134
Dosage-sensitive genes in evolution and disease
Rice, A. M., & McLysaght, A. (2017) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0418-y · Cited by 141
The three-dimensional genome: regulating gene expression during pluripotency and development
Andrey, G., & Mundlos, S. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.148304 · Cited by 134
Self-citationCTCF shapes chromatin structure and gene expression in health and disease
Dehingia, B., Milewska, M., Janowski, M., & Pękowska, A. (2022) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202255146 · Cited by 141
Will, A. J., Cova, G., Osterwalder, M., Chan, W.-L., Wittler, L., Brieske, N., Heinrich, V., de Villartay, J., Vingron, M., Klopocki, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3939 · Cited by 126
Self-citationInterchromosomal interactions: A genomic love story of kissing chromosomes
Maass, P. G., Barutcu, A. R., & Rinn, J. L. (2018) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201806052 · Cited by 124
Hi-C Identifies Complex Genomic Rearrangements and TAD-Shuffling in Developmental Diseases
Melo, U. S., Schöpflin, R., Acuña‐Hidalgo, R., Mensah, M. A., Fischer‐Zirnsak, B., Holtgrewe, M., Klever, M.-K., Türkmen, S., Heinrich, V., Pluym, I. D., et al. (2020) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.016 · Cited by 123
Self-citationRegulatory functions of the Mediator kinases CDK8 and CDK19
Fant, C. B., & Taatjes, D. J. (2018) · Transcription · doi:10.1080/21541264.2018.1556915 · Cited by 131
Chromatin conformation analysis of primary patient tissue using a low input Hi-C method
Díaz, N., Kruse, K., Erdmann, T., Staiger, A. M., Ott, G., Lenz, G., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06961-0 · Cited by 129
The nuclear matrix protein HNRNPU maintains 3D genome architecture globally in mouse hepatocytesPreprint
Fan, H., Lv, P., Huo, X., Wu, J., Wang, Q., Cheng, L., Liu, Y., Tang, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, F., et al. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.224576.117 · Cited by 113
Advances in Chromatin Imaging at Kilobase-Scale Resolution
Boettiger, A. N., & Murphy, S. E. (2020) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2019.12.010 · Cited by 121
Principles of Chromosome Architecture Revealed by Hi-C
Eagen, K. P. (2018) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.03.006 · Cited by 120
Tan, J., Shenker-Tauris, N., Rodriguez-Hernaez, J., Wang, E., Sakellaropoulos, T., Boccalatte, F. E., Thandapani, P., Skok, J. A., Aifantis, I., Fenyö, D., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01612-8 · Cited by 123
Building Transcription Factor Binding Site Models to Understand Gene Regulation in Plants
Lai, X., Stigliani, A., Vachon, G., Carles, C. C., Smaczniak, C., Zubieta, C., Kaufmann, K., & Parcy, F. (2018) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.10.010 · Cited by 124
Cancer-specific CTCF binding facilitates oncogenic transcriptional dysregulation
Fang, C., Wang, Z., Han, C., Safgren, S. L., Helmin, K. A., Adelman, E. R., Serafin, V., Basso, G., Eagen, K. P., Gaspar‐Maia, A., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02152-7 · Cited by 120
Roles and regulation of SOX transcription factors in skeletogenesis
Lefebvre, V. (2019) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.01.007 · Cited by 101
Non-coding deletions identify Maenli lncRNA as a limb-specific En1 regulator
Allou, L., Balzano, S., Magg, A., Quinodoz, M., Royer‐Bertrand, B., Schöpflin, R., Chan, W.-L., Speck‐Martins, C. E., Carvalho, D. R., Farage, L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03208-9 · Cited by 123
Self-citationConformation of sister chromatids in the replicated human genome
Mitter, M., Gasser, C., Takács, Z., Langer, C. C. H., Tang, W., Jessberger, G., Beales, C. T., Neuner, E., Ameres, S. L., Peters, J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2744-4 · Cited by 111
de Bruijn, S. E., Fiorentino, A., Ottaviani, D., Fanucchi, S., Melo, U. S., Corral-Serrano, J. C., Mulders, T. W. F., Georgiou, M., Rivolta, C., Pontikos, N., et al. (2020) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.09.002 · Cited by 109
Self-citationThree-dimensional genome rewiring in loci with human accelerated regions
Keough, K. C., Whalen, S., Inoue, F., Przytycki, P. F., Fair, T., Deng, C., Steyert, M., Ryu, H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Karlsson, E., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm1696 · Cited by 113
Laugsch, M., Bartusel, M., Rehimi, R., Alirzayeva, H., Karaolidou, A., Crispatzu, G., Zentis, P., Nikolić, M., Bleckwehl, T., Kolovos, P., et al. (2019) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.004 · Cited by 106
Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions
Schoenfelder, S., Javierre, B. M., Furlan-Magaril, M., Wingett, S., & Fraser, P. (2018) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/57320 · Cited by 121
Chromatin features constrain structural variation across evolutionary timescales
Fudenberg, G., & Pollard, K. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1808631116 · Cited by 107
Robson, M. I., de las Heras, J. I., Czapiewski, R., Sivakumar, A., Kerr, A. R. W., & Schirmer, E. C. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.212308.116 · Cited by 107
A TAD boundary is preserved upon deletion of the CTCF-rich Firre locus
Barutcu, A. R., Maass, P. G., Lewandowski, J. P., Weiner, C. L., & Rinn, J. L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03614-0 · Cited by 101
Fishman, V., Баттулин, Н. Р., Nuriddinov, M., Maslova, A., Zlotina, A. M., Strunov, A. A., Chervyakova, D. B., Korablev, A. N., Serov, O. L., & Krasikova, A. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1103 · Cited by 107
Epigenetic maintenance of topological domains in the highly rearranged gibbon genome
Lazar, N. H., Nevonen, K. A., O'Connell, B., McCann, C., O'Neill, R. J., Green, R. E., Meyer, T. J., Okhovat, M., & Carbone, L. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.233874.117 · Cited by 107
Wang, X., Cui, W., & Peng, C. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx735 · Cited by 94
Ghosh, S. K., & Jost, D. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006159 · Cited by 94
Dall’Agnese, A., Caputo, L., Nicoletti, C., di Iulio, J., Schmitt, A. D., Gatto, S., Diao, Y., Ye, Z., Forcato, M., Perera, R. J., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.036 · Cited by 93
SOX9 in organogenesis: shared and unique transcriptional functions
Ming, Z., Vining, B., Bagheri‐Fam, S., & Harley, V. R. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04543-4 · Cited by 100
TADs and Their Borders: Free Movement or Building a Wall?
Chang, L., Ghosh, S., & Noordermeer, D. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.025 · Cited by 97
Spatiotemporal allele organization by allele-specific CRISPR live-cell imaging (SNP-CLING)
Maass, P. G., Barutcu, A. R., Shechner, D. M., Weiner, C. L., Melé, M., & Rinn, J. L. (2017) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-017-0015-3 · Cited by 90
Chromatin Hyperacetylation Impacts Chromosome Folding by Forming a Nuclear Subcompartment
Rosencrance, C. D., Ammouri, H., Yu, Q., Ge, T., Rendleman, E. J., Marshall, S. A., & Eagen, K. P. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.018 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Franke, M., Ibrahim, D. M., Andrey, G., Schwarzer, W., Heinrich, V., Schöpflin, R., Kraft, K., Kempfer, R., Jerković, I., Chan, W.-L., Spielmann, M., Timmermann, B., Wittler, L., Kurth, I., Cambiaso, P., Zuffardi, O., Houge, G., Lambie, L., Brancati, F., Pombo, A., Vingron, M., Spitz, F., & Mundlos, S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (DE)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
- University of L'Aquila (IT)
- Max Delbrück Center (DE)
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mundlos, Stefan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 538
- Issue
- 7624
- Pages
- 265-269
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2528263447
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 41.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Förderstiftung
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Keywords
- genomic duplication, topologically associating domains, SOX9, KCNJ2, structural variants, enhancer-promoter interactions, gene misexpression, limb malformations, sex reversal, chromatin insulation, gene dosage, higher-order chromatin structure, mouse models of human disease, 4C-seq, Hi-C
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease, DNA, Female, Fibroblasts, Fingers, Foot Deformities, Congenital, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Male, Phenotype, Gene Expression, Facies, Gene Duplication, Genomics, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Mice, SOX9 Transcription Factor, DNA Copy Number Variations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
