Cited by 1,365Scientific Computing and Data ManagementGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems

Toil enables reproducible, open source, big biomedical data analyses

Open access
Vivian, John, Rao, Arjun Arkal, Nothaft, Frank Austin, Ketchum, Christopher, Armstrong, Joel, Novak, Adam, Pfeil, Jacob, Narkizian, Jake +19 more·2017·Nature Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3772

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The new MGnify pipeline defined the CWL workflow first and utilizes toil-cwl-runner to orchestrate execution on their compute infrastructure.

    “The new pipeline is a major departure from this practice, where we have defined the CWL workflow first, and now utilize toil-cwl-runner (a CWL compatibility layer that is a part of the Toil workflow execution engine (26)) to orchestrate the execution on our compute infrastructure.”

    From MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020 (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vivian, J., Rao, A. A., Nothaft, F. A., Ketchum, C., Armstrong, J., Novak, A., Pfeil, J., Narkizian, J., Deran, A. D., Musselman-Brown, A., Schmidt, H., Amstutz, P., Craft, B., Goldman, M., Rosenbloom, K., Cline, M., O'Connor, B., Hanna, M., Birger, C., Kent, W. J., Patterson, D. A., Joseph, A. D., Zhu, J., Zaranek, S., Getz, G., Haussler, D., & Paten, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Curoverse (United States) (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Paten, Benedict
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2017-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
314-316
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2607211817
Cited by
1,365
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 210 · 2023: 244 · 2022: 250 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 2
FWCI
92.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Broad Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U41HG002371, U54HG007990)
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA143858, U24CA180951, U24CA210974)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R44GM119858)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Keywords
toil, scientific workflow management, reproducibility, open source software, cloud computing, biomedical data analysis
MeSH terms
Electronic Data Processing, Humans, Software, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review