Cited by 375Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsNuclear Structure and FunctionChromosomal and Genetic Variations

H3K9 methylation and RNA interference regulate nucleolar organization and repeated DNA stability

Open access
Peng, Jamy C., Karpen, Gary H.·2007·Nature Cell Biology

Abstract

Investigations aimed at identifying regulators of nuclear architecture in Drosophila demonstrated that cells lacking H3K9 methylation and RNA interference (RNAi) pathway components displayed disorganized nucleoli, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and satellite DNAs. The levels of H3K9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) in chromatin associated with repeated DNAs decreased dramatically in Su(var)3-9 and dcr-2 (dicer-2) mutant tissues compared with wild type. We also observed a substantial increase in extrachromosomal circular (ecc) repeated DNAs in mutant tissues. The disorganized nucleolus phenotype depends on the presence of Ligase 4 and ecc DNA formation is not induced by removal of cohesin. We conclude that the structural integrity and organization of repeated DNAs and nucleoli are regulated by the H3K9 methylation and RNAi pathways, and other regulators of heterochromatin-mediated silencing. In addition, repeated DNA stability involves suppression of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or other recombination pathways. These results suggest a mechanism for how local chromatin structure can regulate genome stability, and the organization of chromosomal elements and nuclear organelles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncb1514

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, J. C., & Karpen, G. H.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Karpen, Gary H.
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Published
2006-12-10
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
25-35
ISSN
  • 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4679
OpenAlex
W2011068062
Cited by
375
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM066272, R01GM061169)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
H3K9 methylation, RNA interference, nucleolar organization, ribosomal DNA, satellite DNA, extrachromosomal circular DNA, Su(var)3-9, Dicer-2, cohesin, heterochromatin, genome stability, nuclear organization, non-homologous end joining, Drosophila
MeSH terms
Cohesins, Animals, Cell Nucleolus, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA, Ribosomal, DNA, Satellite, Drosophila, Heterochromatin, Histones, Models, Genetic, Nuclear Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, DNA Methylation, Drosophila Proteins, RNA Interference, Protein Inhibitors of Activated STAT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review