Cited by 573Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Pervasive transition of the Brazilian land-use system

Open access
Lapola, David M., Martinelli, Luiz A., Peres, Carlos A., Ometto, Jean P. H. B., Ferreira, Manuel E., Nobre, Carlos A., Aguiar, Ana Paula D., Bustamante, Mercedes M. C. +8 more·2014·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate2056

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soy cultivation is associated with increased household incomes but also increased inequality among producers.

    “Yet, the soy cultivation is associated with increased household incomes but also increased inequality among producers (Weinhold et al., 2013 andLapola et al., 2014).”

    From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Lapola et al., 2014

    The 'Collateral effects on land distribution' section says the shift toward large-scale commodity farming reinforced inequality in land ownership. But it does not establish increased inequality specifically among soy producers. The 'Food security' passage mentions increased per capita income mainly in the Caatinga and attributes it to short-term welfare policies, not soy cultivation; neither passage establishes increased household income from soy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The intensification process is connected with social and environmental degradation, including increased inequality in land ownership, greenhouse gas emissions, soil degradation, and water pollution.

    “However, although the intensification process may have reduced pressure on forests, it is also connected with social and environmental degradation, linked to increased inequality in land ownership (Lapola et al., 2014) and greenhouse gas emissions, soil degradation and water pollution.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Macedo, M. N. et al. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1341-1346 (2012).
  2. Angelsen, A. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19639-19644 (2010).
  3. Municipal Agricultural Production and Population Census (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2012); http://go.nature.com/vdm5lC
  4. Exportação por Ano (ABIEC, accessed 9 September 2013); http://go.nature.com/nWyozz
  5. Barretto, A. G. O. P., Berndes, G., Sparovek, G. & Wirsenius, S. Agricultural intensification in Brazil and its effects on land-use patterns: An analysis of the 1975-2006 period. Glob. Change Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12174 (2013). · DOI
  6. Walker, R. et al. Protecting the Amazonia with protected areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10582-10586 (2009).
  7. Costa, S. H. G. A Questão Agrária no Brasil e a Bancada Ruralista no Congresso Nacional Masters dissertation, Univ. de São Paulo (2012).
  8. VanWey, L. K., Spera S., de Sa, R., Mahr, D. & Mustard, J. F. Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368, 20120168 (2013).
  9. Morton, J. F. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19680-19685 (2007).
  10. Brondizio, E. S. & Moran, E. F. Human dimensions of climate change: The vulnerability of small farmers in the Amazon. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 1803-1809 (2008).
  11. Oliveira, L. J. C., Costa, M. H., Soares-Filho, B. S. & Coe, M. Large-scale expansion of agriculture in Amazonia may be a no-win scenario. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024021 (2013).
  12. Georgescu, M., Lobell, D. B., Field, C. B. & Mahalov, A. Simulated hydroclimatic impacts of projected Brazilian sugarcane expansion. Geophys. Res. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054612 (2013). · DOI
  13. Costa, M. H., Yanagi, S. N. M., Souza, P. J. O. P., Ribeiro, A. & Rocha, E. J. P. Climate change in Amazonia caused by soybean cropland expansion, as compared to caused by pastureland expansion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L07706 (2007).
  14. Monitoring of Vegetation Fires (INPE, accessed 6 December 2013); http://go.nature.com/pFbvTz
  15. Neill, C. et al. Watershed responses to Amazon soya bean cropland expansion and intensification. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120425 (2013).
  16. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260-20264 (2011).
  17. Bungestab, D. M. (ed.) Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-pecuária-floresta: A Produção Sustentável (Embrapa, 2012).
  18. Angelo, C. Brazil's fund for low-carbon agriculture lies fallow. Nature News http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2012.11111 (2012). · DOI
  19. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368, 20120171 (2013).
  20. TerraClass Land-use Database (INPE, accessed 10 September 2013); http://go.nature.com/fIAFXg
  21. Lapola, D. M. et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3388-3393 (2010).
  22. Arima, E. Y., Richards, P., Walker, R. & Caldas, M. M. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 024010 (2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapola, D. M., Martinelli, L. A., Peres, C. A., Ometto, J. P. H. B., Ferreira, M. E., Nobre, C. A., Aguiar, A. P. D., Bustamante, M. M. C., Cardoso, M. F., Costa, M. H., Joly, C. A., Leite, C. C., Moutinho, P., Sampaio, G., Strassburg, B. B. N., & Vieira, I. C. G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR)
Corresponding author
Lapola, David M.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2013-12-20
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
27-35
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2066300309
Cited by
573
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 1
FWCI
25.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
land use change, greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, agricultural intensification, land tenure inequality, rural-urban migration, urban expansion, global cooling, sustainable land use, Brazilian agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review