The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Global climate change awareness is increasing, but efforts to convey information can trigger undesirable behaviors , including denial, scepticism, and increased resource consumption.”
From Mortality management and climate action: A review and reference for using Terror Management Theory methods in interdisciplinary environmental research (2022) · cites this paper as Hornsey et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In some countries, this has been attributed in part to widespread misunderstandings or rejection of climate change science (Hornsey et al 2016).”
From Framing climate change for effective communication: a systematic map (2020) · cites this paper as Hornsey et al 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?
Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x · Cited by 6,122
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Peters, E. M., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., & Mandel, G. N. (2012) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 2,421
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers.
Kingston, P. W., Douglas, M., & Wíldavsky, A. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2067477 · Cited by 2,276
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Leviston, Z., Leitch, A., Greenhill, M., Leonard, R. & Walker, I. Australians’ Views of Climate Change (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,002
Karami, R. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03215-y · Cited by 13
“Moreover, individuals with biocentric values are more likely to protect the environment (Hornsey et al., 2016; Whitley et al., 2018; Wan Hus-sain et al., 2021).”
InfluentialBrush, G. J., Guo, X., Hunting, A., & Frethey‐Bentham, C. (2023) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/02761467231182300 · Cited by 18
“A belief in science is stronger when the source is seen as trustworthy and there is perceived consensus among scientists (Hornsey et al. 2016).”
BackgroundAlif, Ž., Novak, A., Mihelič, R., Juvančič, L., & Šumrada, T. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103662 · Cited by 14
Believing in climate change: help or hindrance for entrepreneurs’ resilience?
Lewellyn, K. B., Falcon, S., & Moghaddam, K. (2024) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2024.2310738 · Cited by 13
“…have shown that political affiliation with more conservative political parties and ideas is a significant predictor of disbelief in climate change (Hornsey et al. 2016; Poortinga et al. 2019), studying how entre-preneurs’ political beliefs may configure with psychological attributes to lead to…”
BackgroundLiu, T., Shryane, N. M., & Elliot, M. J. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3011 · Cited by 13
The Role of Fairness for Accepting Stricter Carbon Taxes in Sweden
Lindvall, D., Sörqvist, P., Jagers, S. C., Karlsson, M., Sjöberg, S., & Barthel, S. (2024) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli12110170 · Cited by 17
Public support for more ambitious climate policies: Empirical evidence from Germany
Goerg, S. J., Pondorfer, A., & Stöhr, V. (2025) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108538 · Cited by 15
Climate change skepticism of European farmers and implications for effective policy actions
Kröner, L., van Grinsven, H. J. M., Erisman, J. W., Graversgaard, M., Immerzeel, T., Olesen, J. E., Rodríguez, A., Soriano, B., Sanz-Cobeña, A., & van der Lippe, T. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02304-2 · Cited by 13
“…in Europe, survey data were combined with socio-economiccountryinformationandbiophysicalinformationabout climate change and adaptation, and controlled for micro-level factors such as age, gender, and education level, which have been shown to be relevant in shaping environmental attitudes 39,40 .”
Their Economy and Our Health: Communicating Climate Change to the Divided American Public
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17217718 · Cited by 15
“Additionally, political ideology could serve as a heuristic cue for information processing when people take mental shortcuts to form opinion based on partisanship or ideology instead of facts or even personal experience [24].”
BackgroundAsshoff, R., Konnemann, C., Tramowsky, N., & Rieß, W. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13169208 · Cited by 14
Evaluating effective public engagement: local stories from a global network of IPCC scientists
Pidcock, R., Heath, K., Messling, L., Wang, S., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Corner, A., Shaw, C. J., & Gomis, M. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03230-w · Cited by 15
“While stating that there is consensus is not on its own enough to overcome strong disengagement and scepticism, it can be a useful communication tool nonetheless (van der Linden et al. 2015; Hornsey et al. 2016) Page 4 of 22 21”
BackgroundThe Influence of Evangelical and Political Identity on Climate Change Views
Lowe, B. S., Israel, G. D., Paudyal, R., & Wallen, K. (2022) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2113486 · Cited by 13
Leveraging the Disagreement on Climate Change: Theory and Evidence
Bakkensen, L., Phan, T., Richmond, F. R. B. O., Wong, T.-N., & Richmond, F. R. B. O. (2023) · Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Papers · doi:10.21144/wp23-01 · Cited by 13
Biospheric values as predictor of climate change risk perception: A multinational investigation
Martin, C. (2023) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14083 · Cited by 14
Changing minds about climate change: a pervasive role for domain-general metacognition
Beukelaer, S. D., Vehar, N., Rollwage, M., Fleming, S. M., & Manos Tsakiris, A. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01528-x · Cited by 13
“Information concerning climate change has become an object of ideological polarisation, mobilising political and social attitudes, and determining pro- or anti-environmental behaviours in real life (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDoes Climate Change Exposure Matter to Stakeholders? Evidence from the Costs of High Leverage
Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kuang, H., & Zheng, Y. (2024) · Review of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1561/114.00000060 · Cited by 13
Global warming and sustainability: Understanding the beliefs of marketing faculty
Kemper, J. A., Ballantine, P. W., & Hall, C. M. (2017) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.1664 · Cited by 15
Framing Climate Uncertainty: Frame Choices Reveal and Influence Climate Change Beliefs
Kause, A., Townsend, T., & Gaissmaier, W. (2018) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-18-0002.1 · Cited by 12
What determines the public’s support for water quality regulations to mitigate agricultural runoff?
Guo, T., Gill, D., Johengen, T. H., & Cardinale, B. J. (2019) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.008 · Cited by 16
Drought Intensity, Future Expectations, and the Resilience of Climate Beliefs
Booth, P. L., Walsh, P. J., & Brown, P. H. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106735 · Cited by 13
Heinz Welsch, B. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107026 · Cited by 15
Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain
Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumenthaler, C., Spampatti, T., & Brosch, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208429 · Cited by 14
“Meta-analytic and cross-national research has illustrated that political ideology is among the most influential determinants of individual climate change beliefs, with effects most pronounced in the United States [8,9].”
BackgroundThe Palliative Function of Climate Change Denial Is Stronger in More Exposed Countries
Hadarics, M. (2020) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2020.0031 · Cited by 13
“The latter variable was important to be included because of the well-documented relationship between climate change beliefs and ideological preferences (Hornsey et al., 2016; Stanley & Wilson, 2019).”
Stocker, M., Heger, T., Schweidtmann, A. M., Ćwiek‐Kupczyńska, H., Penev, L., Dojchinovski, M., Willighagen, E., Vidal, M.-E., Turki, H., Balliet, D. P., et al. (2022) · Research Ideas and Outcomes · doi:10.3897/rio.8.e83789 · Cited by 17
Domino Effects in the Earth System -- The role of wanted social tipping pointsPreprint
Smith, E. K., Eder, C., Donges, J. F., Heitzig, J., Κατσανίδου, Α., Wiedermann, M., & Winkelmann, R. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/d8scb · Cited by 13
“Moments of Change” and Low‐Carbon Behaviors: A Multidisciplinary, Systematic Review
Whitmarsh, L. E., Mitev, K., Nash, N., Hoolohan, C., Poortinga, W., Whittle, C., Haggar, P. C., Tipping, C., Dudley, H., Turner, L., et al. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.70014 · Cited by 16
“In keeping with the wider evidence base on the experience of climate impacts (Hornsey et al. 2016), however, climate mitigation behaviors appear to be less likely than adaptation behaviors to result from these experiences unless the event (e.g., flood) is attributed to climate change (Reser and…”
Khan, K. A., Chattopadhyay, A., & Ali, I. (2022) · Current World Environment · doi:10.12944/cwe.17.1.8 · Cited by 12
Nice, M. L., Forziat‐Pytel, K., Benoit, C. T., & Sturm, D. C. (2022) · Professional School Counseling · doi:10.1177/2156759x221090525 · Cited by 17
Alotaibi, B. A., Abbas, A., Ullah, R., Azeem, M. I., Samie, A., Muddassir, M., Dabiah, A. T., Raid, M., & Sadaf, T. (2023) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos14060917 · Cited by 17
Steiglechner, P., Smaldino, P. E., Moser, D., & Merico, A. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0372 · Cited by 13
Ratay, C., Webb, T. L., Wood, W., & Mohnen, A. (2024) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107440 · Cited by 14
“Indeed, evidence suggests that beliefs about climate change have only small to moderate effects on pro-environmental actions (Hornsey et al., 2016), and a substantial literature investigates the gap between pro-environmental intentions and relevant behavior (Carrington et al., 2010; Kollmuss and…”
BackgroundA Team of Five Million?: The 2020 ‘Covid-19’ New Zealand General Election
Vowles, J., Greaves, L. M., & Curtin, J. (2024) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.22459/tfm.2024 · Cited by 12
Trust is good, control is better: The role of trust and personal control in response to threat
Pauer, S., Rutjens, B. T., & van Harreveld, F. (2024) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13058 · Cited by 15
Measuring climate change perception in China using mental images: A nationwide open‐ended survey
Yang, J., He, W., Xia, Z., Wu, K., Fang, W., Ma, Z., Liu, M., & Bi, J. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.17631 · Cited by 14
“Prior studies have demonstrated that individuals who conceptualize climate change as air pollution or ozone depletion are more likely to support carbon mitigation policies (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
Meo, S. A., Shafi, K. M., & Hussain, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1422338 · Cited by 24
Determinants of climate change risk perception in Latin America
Fasolin, G. N., Spektor, M., Marques, R., & Camargo, J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58072-2 · Cited by 12
“We begin by examining political ideology, a well-documented determinant of risk perception in the United States 29,30 and many Western Europeancountries.”
Secure and defensive forms of national identity and public support for climate policies
Cisłak, A., Wójcik, A. D., Borkowska, J., & Milfont, T. L. (2023) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000146 · Cited by 13
Liu, J., Cheng, H., Sun, X., Huang, L., Fan, Q., & Liu, H. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9071147 · Cited by 12
“Moreover, given the differences in local economies, culture and ideologies, the general public in Asia has different perceptions of climate change and thus different adaptive strategies compared with those used in Europe and America [37,38].”
ResultHuang, K., & Sim, N. (2017) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpx051 · Cited by 12
Elite Influence on Climate Change Skepticism: Evidence from Close Gubernatorial Elections
Meyer, A. G. (2019) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/703744 · Cited by 14
“Yet, there are substantial differences in climate change beliefs and concern across segments of US society; individual party affiliation is recognized as one of the particularly strong predictors of climate change beliefs (e.g., Borick and Rabe 2010; Hornsey et al. 2016; Egan and Mullin 2017).”
Game of Cruxes: co-designing a game for scientists and stakeholders for identifying joint problems
Salliou, N., Bruley, E., Moreau, C., Luthe, T., Blanco, V., Lavorel, S., & Grêt‐Regamey, A. (2021) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00983-2 · Cited by 17
The impact of climate risk valuation on the regional mitigation strategies
Yang, P., Mi, Z., Coffman, D., Cao, Y., Yao, Y.-F., & Li, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127786 · Cited by 12
“Factors such as values, ideologies, and worldviews can shape people's climate beliefs, but the belief is not necessarily turning into actions (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundShealy, T., Godwin, A., & Gardner, H. (2018) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--28891 · Cited by 12
“Political affiliation is also a highly correlated variable for the general population about climate change belief (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Effects of Climate Action Interventions along Cultural Individualism-CollectivismPreprint
Goldwert, D., Bao, Y. E., Doell, K. C., Bavel, J. J. V., & Vlasceanu, M. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cv3n4 · Cited by 12
Xu, Z., Yang, Y., & Sun, T. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03084-2 · Cited by 11
“Previous studies have shown that the social adaptations to climate change are influenced and restricted by resource, technology, economy, and other factors (Klein and Smith, 2003, Brooks and Adger, 2005, Adger et al. 2007, Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundNguyen, T. M., Brown, P. H., & Noy, I. (2022) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2022.2141179 · Cited by 11
“Some studies have noted that demographic and social characteristics such as age, education, gender, and farming experience are important determinants of individuals’ perceptions of climate change (Acquah & Onumah, 2011; Borick & Rabe, 2010; Hamilton et al., 2018; Hornsey et al., 2016; Mase et al., 2017; Roco et al., 2…”
BackgroundHerberz, M., Brosch, T., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101972 · Cited by 14
Echo chambers, polarization, and “Post-truth”: In search of a connection
Munroe, W. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2174426 · Cited by 15
“Climate change skepticism is sorted on partisan lines with party identification now being the strongest sociodemographic predictor of one’s views on climate change (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
The effect of traditional media consumption and internet use on environmental attitudes in Europe
Babutsidze, Z., Blankenberg, A., & Chai, A. (2023) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-023-00810-0 · Cited by 13
Nonprofit Disaster Response and Climate Change: Who Responds? Who Plans?
Gazley, B., & Cash, R. (2023) · Nonprofit Policy Forum · doi:10.1515/npf-2023-0017 · Cited by 11
What drives adaptive behaviours during heatwaves? A systematic review with a meta-analysis
Soto, M. B., & Guillon, M. (2024) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2024.2388225 · Cited by 14
“Following Hornsey et al. (2016) and van Valkengoed and Steg (2019), we included in the meta-analysis only those factors that appear in at least fi ve studies.”
Park, J., & Chang, K. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16177298 · Cited by 11
Understanding public acceptability of climate policies in Europe
Zhang, S., Ferreira, S., & Karali, B. (2024) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2024.2415371 · Cited by 11
“Even though only a small number of people remain skeptical about the scienti fi c basis of anthropogenic climate change (Leiserowitz et al., 2021), believing in climate change has a limited e ff ect on how people act to reduce carbon emissions (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
Obe, M. M., Kpadé, C. P., & Singbo, A. G. (2025) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03892-w · Cited by 16
“This approach provides a comprehensive overview by weighting studies based on sample size and applying the random-effects model to account for study variability (Hornsey et al. 2016 ; Clements et al. 2020 ; Khan et al. 2020 ; Liebmann et al. 2022 ), with the DerSimonian‒Laird estimate of tau 2 .”
Syropoulos, S., & Sparkman, G. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2419705122 · Cited by 12
“…and talk about climate change in their sermons and teachings in the United States, we also had specific expectations about which religious leaders may believe in climate change and whether they would discuss it with their congregation based on prior research on belief in climate change ( 11 , 12 ).”
Anjum, G., & Aziz, M. (2025) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2025.2511267 · Cited by 12
“A meta-analysis revealed that values, ideologies, and political orientation are stronger predictors of climate change beliefs than either education or personal experience with extreme weather events (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
Bridging the gap: Introducing a socio-cultural dimension to explain beliefs about man-made threats
Glogger, I., & Shehata, A. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625221095723 · Cited by 11
“, 2016), climate change (Diehl et al., 2019; Hornsey et al., 2016), or emerging technologies (Druckman and Bolsen, 2011; Kahan et al.”
BackgroundDo Australians trust scientists? It depends on the ‘science’
Tranter, B. (2023) · Australian Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1002/ajs4.263 · Cited by 11
Landwehr, T., Riebl, R., Haensel, M., Schmitt, T. M., Thiemann, M., & Koellner, T. (2023) · GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society · doi:10.14512/gaia.32.3.8 · Cited by 11
Using Meta-Analysis in the Social Sciences to Improve Environmental Policy
Maki, A., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2017) · World sustainability series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_2 · Cited by 12
“In other areas of the environmental social sciences, meta-analysis has been used to explore the factors most strongly linked to belief in anthropogenic climate change (Hornsey et al. 2016) and the effect of environmental regulation on firm and country competiveness (Cohen and Tubb 2016).”
BackgroundBradshaw, W. S., Phillips, A. J., Bybee, S., Gill, R., Peck, S. L., & Jensen, J. L. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205798 · Cited by 11
Doom, gloom, or boom? Perceptions of climate change among Canadian winegrowers
Jobin, E., Pickering, G. J., & Plummer, R. (2019) · International Journal of Wine Research · doi:10.2147/ijwr.s188787 · Cited by 11
“Also, CC skepticism and uncertainty represent obstacles to mitigation efforts and willingness to adopt climate protection measures.(8,17,18) For example, while CC awareness has been increasing internationally in the last few decades,(8) attribution skeptics – or people who believe that the Earth’s climate is changing,…”
BackgroundShi, W., Chen, C., Xiong, J., & Fu, H. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11061619 · Cited by 11
Negations in uncertainty lexicon affect attention, decision-making and trust
Juanchich, M., Shepherd, T., & Sirota, M. (2020) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02737-y · Cited by 7
“People ’ s beliefs do not necessarily translate into support for climate change mitigation policies or changes in behaviour that would reduce CO 2 emissions (Hornsey et al. 2016; Leiserowitz 2006; Maibach et al. 2015).”
BackgroundBazart, C., Trouillet, R., Rey‐Valette, H., & Lautrédou-Audouy, N. (2020) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02690-w · Cited by 11
Unequal Representation of Women and Youth on Climate Policy Issues
Helliesen, M. S. (2022) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2022.2133001 · Cited by 10
“Research has shown systematic variations in climate change perceptions and policy preferences between men and women, age groups, and educational attainment in Western democracies, including Norway (Ballew et al., 2020; Hornsey et al., 2016; Poor-tinga et al., 2019).”
BackgroundWójcik, A. D. (2023) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100109 · Cited by 10
Dakin, N. M., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12913 · Cited by 11
“There is by now heavy accumulation of evidence from social psychology that conservative ideology plays a major role in facilitating climate denial (e.g., see Azevedo & Jost, 2021; Hornsey et al., 2016 ; van der Linden et al., 2021).”
BackgroundResultBulut, H., & Samuel, R. (2024) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-024-00103-7 · Cited by 11
“Studies have consistently shownthathighereducation levels arelinked with more pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours 68 – 70 .”
Mata, F., Santos, D., Cano‐Díaz, C., Jesus, M. S., & Vaz‐Velho, M. (2024) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-024-01961-x · Cited by 10
“Political and industrial motivations have been pointed out as factors of CC denial (Farrell 2016; Hornsey et al. 2016), that justify inaction in mitigation efforts.”
Identifying American climate change free riders and motivating sustainable behavior
Magistro, B., Abramson, C., Ebanks, D., Debnath, R., & Alvarez, R. M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57042-w · Cited by 10
Lind, A. V., Morton, T. A., & Dalege, J. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102370 · Cited by 11
Navigating sustainable futures: The role of terminal and instrumental values
Osberg, G., Schulz, F., & Bretter, C. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108325 · Cited by 10
Gugushvili, D. (2024) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2024.2400421 · Cited by 12
“In this respect, political polarization of environmental attitudes is especially important, as multiple studies have shown that ideology and political party affiliation are particularly powerful predictors of environmental attitudes in general (Hornsey et al. 2016; McCright, Xiao, and Dunlap 2014).”
Jankowski, J. M., Mlynski, C., & Job, V. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102445 · Cited by 10
Orchinik, R., Dubey, R., Gershman, S. J., Powell, D., & Bhui, R. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae485 · Cited by 18
Perceived support for climate policy in Australia: The asymmetrical influence of voting behaviour
Leviston, Z., Stanley, S. K., & Walker, I. A. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102488 · Cited by 10
Effective Strategies for Learning and Teaching in Times of Science Denial and Disinformation
Busch, K. C., & Lombardi, D. (2025) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.70003 · Cited by 10
Trust in climate scientists is associated with political ideology: A 26-country analysis
Remsö, A., Schmidt, J., Geiger, S. J., Većkalov, B., Krajnc, Ž., Laughton, I., Shavgulidze, M., Renström, E. A., & Ruggeri, K. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102609 · Cited by 14
Exploring Climate Change Adaptation, Mitigation and Marketing Connections
Deo, K., & Prasad, A. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14074255 · Cited by 11
Rabinovich, A., Zhischenko, V., Nasseri, M., Heath, S. C., Laizer, A., Mkilema, F., Patrick, A., Wynants, M., Blake, W. H., Mtei, K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101885 · Cited by 10
“For example, a meta-analysis of a relationship between understanding (and accepting) scientific consensus on climate change and taking sustainable action suggests that this association is small to moderate (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundPrati, G., Tzankova, I., Albanesi, C., & Cicognani, E. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142315716 · Cited by 9
Design-Based Approach to Support Sorting Behavior of Food Packaging
Nemat, B., Razzaghi, M., Bolton, K., & Rousta, K. (2023) · Clean Technologies · doi:10.3390/cleantechnol5010017 · Cited by 10
Gillis, A. J., Geiger, N., Raimi, K. T., Lee, J., & Sarge, M. A. (2023) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03519-y · Cited by 12
“There is a well-documented political gap in one’s concern about climate change in the USA; Democrats (and those on the political left) tend to be more concerned about the topic than Republicans (and those on the political right; Hornsey et al. 2016).”
BackgroundStefkovics, Á., & Zenovitz, L. (2023) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03633-x · Cited by 10
“Since skepticism may jeopardize climate policy support or climate actions (Hornsey et al. 2016; Bou-man et al. 2020), understanding the formulation of climate change beliefs is important.”
BackgroundHow the experience of California wildfires shape Twitter climate change framings
Ko, J. W. Y., Ni, S., Taylor, A., Chen, X., Huang, Y., Kumar, A., Alsudais, S., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Wang, W. W., et al. (2024) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03668-0 · Cited by 16
“This finding is consistent with Hornsey et al. (2016) meta-analysis that the association between climate change beliefs and the willingness to act in climate-friendly ways is slight.”
Dokshin, F. A. (2019) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1611020 · Cited by 10
Feucht, F. C., Michaelson, M. K., Hany, S. L., Maziarz, L. N., & Ziegler, N. E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212899 · Cited by 10
“S citizens believe climate change is mostly caused by human activities [45] in contrast to the more than 98% of publishing climate scientists who assert that human activities play a role [46].”
BackgroundLearning about climate politics during COP 21: Explaining a diminishing knowledge gap
Silva-Schmidt, F. D., Brüggemann, M., Hoppe, I., & Arlt, D. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211068635 · Cited by 10
“, 2008; Kaiser and Fuhrer, 2003; Sterman and Sweeney, 2007), as well as a general pro-environmental stance and a high internal efficacy (Hornsey et al., 2016; Kahan et al., 2012).”
BackgroundProtecting the Planet or Destroying the Universe? Understanding Reactions to Space Mining
Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., Grice, T. A., & Chapman, C. M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14074119 · Cited by 12
“This construct is a powerful predictor of climate change skepticism [38] and of perceptions of environmental risk more generally [39,40].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPerceived cultural impacts of climate change motivate climate action and support for climate policy
Tam, K., Leung, A. K. ‐., & Koh, B. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03337-8 · Cited by 10
“This observation agrees with the general observations found in research on climate change beliefs (Hornsey et al. 2016) and concern for environmental issues (Cruz 2017).”
BackgroundResultMeirick, P. C. (2022) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470221119839 · Cited by 12
“Party identification is also a powerful predictor of how much people believe in global warming (Carmichael et al., 2017; Dunlap & McCright, 2008; Hornsey et al., 2016; McCright & Dunlap, 2011).”
BackgroundChapman, D. A., Gagné, T. O., Ovitz, K. L., Griffin, L. P., Danylchuk, A. J., & Markowitz, E. M. (2018) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2018.1429034 · Cited by 10
“Age of the angler as a relatively weak but persistent predictor (consistent with Hornsey et al., 2016) suggests it will be important to explore the motivation in younger fishers to promote self-regulation.”
BackgroundResultKesberg, R., & Keller, J. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110458 · Cited by 20
Motta, M. (2020) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa020 · Cited by 10
Habits to Save our Habitat: Using the Psychology of Habits to Promote SustainabilityPreprint
Mazar, A., Tomaino, G., Carmon, Z., & Wood, W. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kwdh9 · Cited by 11
Byron, L. G., & Akerlof, K. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11737-1 · Cited by 8
Secure human attachment can promote support for climate change mitigation
Nisa, C. F., Bélanger, J. J., Schumpe, B. M., & Sasin, E. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101046118 · Cited by 12
“However, future research should also examine concepts like right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) or social dominance orientation (SDO), both of which have been shown predictors of proenvironmental attitudes (26, 31).”
BackgroundInfluentialCanadian climate change attitudes and energy policy
Seiler, L. Y., & Stalker, G. J. (2023) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12424 · Cited by 9
Malt, B. C., & Marsh, J. K. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12676 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hornsey, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2016-02-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 622-626
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2279692628
- Cited by
- 1,616
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 165 · 2025: 244 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 182 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 22
- FWCI
- 233.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.qut.edu.au
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Keywords
- climate change beliefs, climate change skepticism, political ideology, political orientation, worldview, climate-friendly behavior, climate action intentions, sex differences, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review