The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Global climate change awareness is increasing, but efforts to convey information can trigger undesirable behaviors , including denial, scepticism, and increased resource consumption.”
From Mortality management and climate action: A review and reference for using Terror Management Theory methods in interdisciplinary environmental research (2022) · cites this paper as Hornsey et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In some countries, this has been attributed in part to widespread misunderstandings or rejection of climate change science (Hornsey et al 2016).”
From Framing climate change for effective communication: a systematic map (2020) · cites this paper as Hornsey et al 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?
Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x · Cited by 6,122
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Peters, E. M., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., & Mandel, G. N. (2012) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 2,421
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers.
Kingston, P. W., Douglas, M., & Wíldavsky, A. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2067477 · Cited by 2,276
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Leviston, Z., Leitch, A., Greenhill, M., Leonard, R. & Walker, I. Australians’ Views of Climate Change (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,002
The Climate Decade: Changing Attitudes on Three Continents
Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., Krupnick, A., Lampi, E., Löfgren, Å., Qin, P., Sterner, T., & Yang, X. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102426 · Cited by 38
No glory without sacrifice — drivers of climate (in)action in the general population
Thaller, A., Fleiß, E., & Brudermann, T. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.014 · Cited by 44
Personality change and sustainability attitudes and behaviors
Hopwood, C. J., Schwaba, T., Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G., & Bleidorn, W. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070211016260 · Cited by 47
“It is plausible that levels of all six change normatively in the population over time and that some people change more than others (Arnocky et al., 2014; Hornsey et al., 2016; Johnstone & Lindh, 2018; Milfont et al., 2017; Wiernik et al., 2013; Wray-Lake et al., 2010).”
BackgroundUnderstanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
Cook, J. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3686-8.ch081 · Cited by 40
Cipriani, E., Frumento, S., Gemignani, A., & Menicucci, D. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102277 · Cited by 44
Raimi, K. T., Stern, P. C., & Maki, A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171130 · Cited by 39
Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218305 · Cited by 51
Do as the Romans do: On the authoritarian roots of pseudoscience
Fasce, A., Adrián‐Ventura, J., & Avendaño, D. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520935078 · Cited by 42
“…although there is a confirmed relationship between conservatism and some instances of science denial, such as climate change denial (e.g. Hornsey et al., 2016), other instances, such as genetically modified organism (GMO) opposition, do not show distinctive political associations…”
BackgroundPolicy attributes, perceived impacts, and climate change policy preferences
Swim, J. K., & Geiger, N. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101673 · Cited by 37
Smith, L. K. M., Ross, H. C., Shouldice, S. A., & Wolfe, S. E. (2022) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.776 · Cited by 36
“Yet all levels of climate action are met with rationalization, avoidance, denial, skepticism, and increased resource consumption (Arndt et al., 2004; Hornsey et al., 2016; Whitmarsh, 2009; Whitmarsh, 2011).”
BackgroundThe climate change risk perception model in the United States: A replication study
Gilbert, C., & Lachlan, K. A. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101969 · Cited by 38
de Graaf, J. A., Stok, F. M., de Wit, J. B. F., & Bal, M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102068 · Cited by 36
What do we know about consumers’ attitudes towards cultured meat? A scoping review
Tsvakirai, C. Z., Nalley, L. L., & Tshehla, M. F. (2023) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100279 · Cited by 36
Experience with extreme weather events increases willingness-to-pay for climate mitigation policy
Gould, R. K., Shrum, T., Harrington, D. R., & Iglesias, V. (2024) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102795 · Cited by 36
Hoekstra, A. G., Noordzij, K., de Koster, W., & van der Waal, J. (2024) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102851 · Cited by 36
A comparison of California and Texas secondary science teachers’ perceptions of climate change
Khalidi, R., & Ramsey, J. (2020) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1838447 · Cited by 36
“Research has shown that individuals with liberal ideology are more likely to believe in climate change, and the scientific consensus about it, than those with conservative ideology (Dunlap et al. 2016; Hornsey et al. 2016; Hu et al. 2017).”
BackgroundThreats to Science: Politicization, Misinformation, and Inequalities
Druckman, J. N. (2022) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221095431 · Cited by 44
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009325844.016 · Cited by 59
On the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior - A Guide for Further InvestigationsPreprint
Blankenberg, A., & Alhusen, H. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3186089 · Cited by 42
“An individual’s belief in climate change only has a small up to moderate e↵ect on their willingness to behave in a climate-friendly way (meta-analysis) (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLiu, T., Shryane, N. M., & Elliot, M. J. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01287-1 · Cited by 35
“…for age, with some studies revealing a small negative correlation between age and climate change perception, (e.g., see Heath and Gifford, 2006; Hornsey et al., 2016), while others find no significant effect (e.g., Akerlof et al., 2013; O’Connor et al., 1999) or a positive correlation (Slimak…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBorkhani, F. R., Khaleghi, B., Mirtorabi, M. S., & Mohammadi, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-022-04568-z · Cited by 35
“Values support and determine behaviors, beliefs and decisions (Satterfield 2001; Steg et al. 2014a, b; Chen 2015; Hornsey et al. 2016; Bouman et al. 2018; Liobikienė and Poškus 2019), so assessing values can present different perspectives on how people use, manage and experience environment resources (Jackson et al.”
BackgroundAnalysis of climate change disinformation across types, agents and media platforms
Hassan, I., Musa, R. M., Azmi, M. N. L., Abdullah, M. R., & Yusoff, S. Z. (2023) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669221148693 · Cited by 35
“…pointed out that politics contributes to climate change disinformation, a few studies showed that political beliefs, as well as trust in political institutions and values, have a positive in fl uence on people ’ s opinions about climate change (Drews and van den Bergh, 2015; Hornsey et al., 2016).”
Collective adaptation to climate change
Wannewitz, M., & Garschagen, M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101248 · Cited by 35
Rüttenauer, T. (2023) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2023.2277281 · Cited by 56
Rosa, C. D., Collado, S., & Profice, C. C. (2018) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0061-y · Cited by 36
Climate change beliefs shape the interpretation of forest fire events
Lacroix, K., Gifford, R., & Rush, J. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02584-6 · Cited by 38
“Whether individuals associate these with climate change or not, some of its consequences can be personally experienced from natural disasters such as flooding, droughts, or forest fires, which correlate with stronger climate change concern (Akerlof et al. 2013; Hornsey et al. 2016; Konisky et al. 2016; Martin et al. 2…”
BackgroundLewandowsky, S., Woike, J. K., & Oberauer, K. (2020) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.99 · Cited by 38
Schwaller, N. L., Kelmenson, S., BenDor, T. K., & Spurlock, D. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.001 · Cited by 35
Kelly, R., Nettlefold, J., Mossop, D., Bettiol, S. S., Corney, S. P., Cullen‐Knox, C., Fleming, A., Leith, P., Melbourne-Thomas, J., Ogier, E. M., et al. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.009 · Cited by 35
Fischer, H., & Said, N. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104545 · Cited by 35
Hornsey, M. J., Edwards, M. R., Lobera, J., Díaz‐Catalán, C., & Barlow, F. K. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12500 · Cited by 41
Self-citationStanley, S. K. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211020356 · Cited by 35
“Individuals who align with a conservative political ideology, and in particular those endorsing SDO and RWA, are more likely to deny climate change and hold less proenvironmental attitudes (Hornsey et al., 2016; Stanley & Wilson, 2019).”
BackgroundBurnett, M., & Mach, K. J. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102345 · Cited by 35
The Citizen's Guide to Climate Success
Jaccard, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783453 · Cited by 40
Climate denial in Canada and the United States
Boulianne, S., & Belland, S. (2022) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12388 · Cited by 43
“As mentioned, a meta-analysis of research does not consider the causal order of ideology and climate change opinions, nor does this research cite any over-time panel data that could test the causal order (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFear emotion reduces reported mitigation behavior in adolescents subject to climate change education
Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03419-7 · Cited by 41
Bertoldo, R. B., Mays, C., Böhm, G., Poortinga, W., Marc Poumadère, A., Tvinnereim, E. M., Arnold, A., Steentjes, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519865448 · Cited by 35
Kim, I., Hammond, M. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101547 · Cited by 36
Factors affecting energy-efficiency investment in the hotel industry: survey results from Spain
López-Bernabé, E., Foudi, S., Linares, P., & Galarraga, I. (2021) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-021-09936-1 · Cited by 34
“Related to this, several studies find no significant link between proenvironmental attitudes and investment in EE or energy-saving actions (Hornsey et al. 2016; Kollmuss and Agyeman 2002; Ramos et al. 2016; Schleich et al. 2016; van der Linden 2017), in other words that proenvironmental attitudes…”
BackgroundLiberty and the pursuit of science denial
Lewandowsky, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.024 · Cited by 40
Public perception of climate change and its impact on natural disasters
Cvetković, V. M., & Grbic, L. (2021) · Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA · doi:10.2298/ijgi2101043c · Cited by 36
Većkalov, B., Zarzeczna, N., Niehoff, E., McPhetres, J., & Rutjens, B. T. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101703 · Cited by 40
“For example, a meta-analysis by Hornsey et al. (2016) found political conservatism to be a robust predictor of climate change beliefs.”
Shreedhar, G., & Galizzi, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101710 · Cited by 36
Tiet, T. T., To‐The, N., & Nguyen‐Anh, T. (2022) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-021-02030-7 · Cited by 37
“Additionally, beliefs about potential climate impacts would positively influence individuals’ attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation management strategies (Arbuckle et al., 2013; Hornsey et al., 2016).”
BackgroundThe weather affects air conditioner purchases to fill the energy efficiency gap
He, P., Liu, P., Qiu, Y. L., & Liu, L. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33531-2 · Cited by 34
Climate change knowledge influences attitude to mitigation via efficacy beliefs
Loo, A. M. H., & Walker, B. R. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14026 · Cited by 33
“The study extends upon the literature supporting both climate change knowledge and self-efficacy for climate change as predictors of pro-environmental attitudes (Bamberg & Möser, 2007; Bostrom et al., 2019; Geiger et al., 2017; Hornsey et al., 2016; Ranney & Clark, 2016).”
BackgroundBehavioral interventions motivate action to address climate change
Sinclair, A. H., Cosme, D., Lydic, K. O., Reinero, D. A., Tartak, J. C., MANN, M. E., & Falk, E. B. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2426768122 · Cited by 43
“Climate change is a politically polarized issue—in the United States and globally, conservatives are less likely to believe in climate change, perceive climate change as a threat, and support action to address climate change ( 109 , 110 ).”
Examining Public Concern about Global Warming and Climate Change in China
Liu, X., Hao, F., Portney, K. E., & Liu, Y. (2019) · The China Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0305741019000845 · Cited by 33
“21 Brody et al. 2008; Hornsey et al. 2016; McCright et al. 2016; Drews and van den Bergh 2016.”
BackgroundEmotional foundations of the public climate change divide
Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumenthaler, C., & Brosch, T. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02552-0 · Cited by 33
Scepticism and perceived self-efficacy influence fishers’ low risk perceptions of climate change
Maltby, K. M., Simpson, S. D., & Turner, R. A. (2021) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2020.100267 · Cited by 33
Bal, M., Stok, F. M., van Hemel, C. G., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Cities · doi:10.3389/frsc.2021.656781 · Cited by 33
“…four types of core values have been discerned (Schwartz, 1992; Stern et al., 1998; Dietz et al., 2005; de Groot and Steg, 2008; Steg et al., 2014; Hornsey et al., 2016): two types of self-transcending values that motivate sustainable behavior intentions, namely biospheric values (i.e., valuing…”
BackgroundJylhä, K. M., Stanley, S. K., Ojala, M., & Clarke, E. J. R. (2022) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000487 · Cited by 49
Crawley, S., Coffé, H., & Chapman, R. (2021) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02842-0 · Cited by 39
“The lack of a strong relationship between political orientation and either of our measures of climate opinion was surprising, given the centrality of political orientation that has been reported in previous literature on climate opinion (Hornsey et al., 2016; McCright, et al., 2016a, 2016b).”
BackgroundResultFacing global environmental change: The role of culturally embedded cognitive biases
Moser, D., Steiglechner, P., & Schlüter, A. (2022) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100735 · Cited by 34
Why Is Mother Earth on Life Support? Metaphors in Environmental Discourse
Flusberg, S. J., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12651 · Cited by 33
Mat, S. T. B., & Yilmaz, B. N. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106274 · Cited by 41
Doran, R., Böhm, G., Pfister, H., Steentjes, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2019) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1473468 · Cited by 31
“A recent meta-analysis from Hornsey et al. (2016) shows that socio-demographics (e.g. age, gender, education, political affiliation and ideology) contribute to explaining the degree to which an individual believes in climate change, which in turn increases together with pro-environmental intentions…”
BackgroundInfluentialUnavoidable solutions for coastal adaptation in Reunion Island (Indian Ocean)
Magnan, A., & Duvat, V. K. E. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.002 · Cited by 34
Cutler, M., Marlon, J. R., Howe, P. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2019.1690725 · Cited by 32
“…events and perceptions of risks associated with global warming, however, has found relatively limited support (McCright, Dunlap, and Xiao 2014; Hornsey et al. 2016), and is likely due in part to the perceived spatial and temporal distance of global warming among the general public in the…”
BackgroundButtlar, B., Rothe, A., Kleinert, S., Hahn, L., & Walther, E. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1791207 · Cited by 33
Chan, H., & Tam, K. (2020) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12430 · Cited by 33
Jylhä, K. M., Tam, K., & Milfont, T. L. (2020) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12444 · Cited by 34
Gibbon, E., & Douglas, H. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111031 · Cited by 32
The electoral importance and evolution of climate‐related energy policy: evidence from Switzerland
Lüth, M., & Schaffer, L. M. (2022) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12520 · Cited by 35
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the climate change worry scale
Innocenti, M., Santarelli, G., Faggi, V., Ciabini, L., Castellini, G., Galassi, F., & Ricca, V. (2022) · The Journal of Climate Change and Health · doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100140 · Cited by 31
Impact of Climate Change on Paddy Production: Evidence from Nepal
Devkota, N., & Paija, N. (2020) · Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development · doi:10.37801/ajad2020.17.2.4 · Cited by 31
“There is no debate that climate change is real (Hornsey et al. 2016).”
BackgroundLeite, Â. M. T., Lopes, D., & Pereira, L. H. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13120966 · Cited by 37
“…et al. [33] found that conservatives tend to value government regulations less, while liberals are more likely to tolerate or even welcome a greater government role in promoting public welfare [51]; this is corroborated in the studies of Hornsey et al. [52], Wang and Kim [53], and Whitmarsh [54].”
ResultStanley, S. K., Heffernan, T., Macleod, E., Lane, J., Walker, I. A., Evans, O., Greenwood, L., Kurz, T., Calear, A. L., Reynolds, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102273 · Cited by 31
In the Eye of the Storm: Hurricanes, Climate Migration, and Climate Attitudes
Arias, S. B., & Blair, C. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055424000352 · Cited by 38
“The impacts of disasters are often substantively small (Hornsey et al. 2016; Whitmarsh 2008).”
InfluentialAméztegui, A., Solarik, K. A., Parkins, J. R., Houle, D., Messier, C., & Gravel, D. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197689 · Cited by 31
“The importance of political view as predictor of climate change perceptions has already been observed for the general population and policy makers of the United States and Canada, where the largest differences in views of the existence of global warming appear across partisan affiliation [11,20,26,40].”
BackgroundResultHannah, A. L., & Rhubart, D. C. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02590-8 · Cited by 37
Extreme weather and climate opinion: evidence from Australia
Hughes, L., Konisky, D. M., & Potter, S. (2020) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02900-5 · Cited by 31
“The results also suggest any difference in the strategies adopted by elites in framing climate change in Australia compared to the USA—such as placing greater emphasis on the costs of climate mitigation while recognizing that climate change is occurring—does not change the substantive relationship between political af…”
BackgroundInfluentialReducing the gap between pro‐environmental disposition and behavior: The role of feeling power
Dong, M., Vélez, G. F. P., & Wu, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12733 · Cited by 32
“For example, power endows people with subjective feelings of control and autonomy (Inesi et al., 2011; Lammers et al., 2016), refrains them from the influences of others (Galinsky et al., 2008; Guinote, 2007), and ultimately promotes authenticity and individual well-being (Kifer et al., 2013;…”
BackgroundBallew, M. T., Marlon, J. R., Goldberg, M. H., Maibach, E. W., Rosenthal, S. A., Aiken, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03397-w · Cited by 39
“Political views are among the strongest correlates of global warming opinion in the USA (e.g., Brulle et al. 2012; Hornsey et al. 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialTang, K. H. D. (2022) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-05-2022-0151 · Cited by 31
Why focusing on “climate change denial” is counterproductive
Bretter, C., & Schulz, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2217716120 · Cited by 31
“On the individual level, the share of climate change deniers has been decreasing continuously for the past decade (6).”
BackgroundReasoning about climate change
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad100 · Cited by 41
Proud fathers and fossil fuels: gendered identities and climate obstruction
Letourneau, A. M., Davidson, D. J., Karsgaard, C., & Ivanova, D. (2023) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2274271 · Cited by 31
“2000, Davidson and Haan 2012, Hornsey et al .”
BackgroundGrowing polarisation: ideology and attitudes towards climate change
Coffé, H., Crawley, S., & Givens, J. (2025) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2024.2435727 · Cited by 36
Milfont, T. L., Abrahamse, W., & MacDonald, E. A. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110237 · Cited by 30
Challenging the Idea That Humans Are Not Designed to Solve Climate Change
Atkinson, Q. D., & Jacquet, J. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211018454 · Cited by 35
“Cross-cultural work has demonstrated that, around the globe, democratic values and, particularly in the West, worldview and political ideology are among the most powerful and consistent predictors of climate change concern (Dunlap et al., 2016; Hornsey et al., 2016; Lewis et al., 2019).”
BackgroundRingqvist, J. (2021) · British Journal of Industrial Relations · doi:10.1111/bjir.12654 · Cited by 29
Trust is key: Determinants of false beliefs about climate change in eight countries
Ejaz, W., Altay, S., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241250302 · Cited by 29
“A meta-analysis found that trust in scientists is one of the strongest predictors of acceptance of climate change (Hornsey et al., 2016).”
InfluentialPrinzing, M. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976241251766 · Cited by 38
“…perceptions and highlight a novel strategy for motivating climate action. concern and proenvironmental behavior are more normative for those on the political left (Hornsey et al., 2016), the more right-leaning people are, the less their group members will tend to commend proenvironmen-tal behavior.”
The effect of seeing scientists as intellectually humble on trust in scientists and their research
Koetke, J., Schumann, K., Bowes, S. M., & Vaupotič, N. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02060-x · Cited by 30
“3, 5 and 8).”
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.012 · Cited by 29
It's not too late to do the right thing: Moral motivations for climate change action
Bain, P. G., & Bongiorno, R. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.615 · Cited by 36
Self-citationThe drivers of individual climate actions in Europe
Reichl, J., Cohen, J., Klöckner, C. A., Kollmann, A., & Борисовна, А. В. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102390 · Cited by 33
Tenali, S., & McManus, P. (2022) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2301 · Cited by 29
Apaolaza, V., Paredes, M. R., Hartmann, P., Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131914 · Cited by 29
Chan, H., Tam, K., & Hong, Y. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101980 · Cited by 29
Climate change and intergroup relations: Psychological insights, synergies, and future prospects
Pearson, A. R., & Schuldt, J. P. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217747750 · Cited by 32
Public scientific testimony in the scientific image
Gerken, M. (2020) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.05.006 · Cited by 28
Diverging Beliefs on Climate Change and Climate Policy: The Role of Political Orientation
Knollenborg, L., & Sommer, S. (2022) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-022-00747-1 · Cited by 28
“In line with previous findings from the literature (e.g., McCright and Dunlap 2011; Hornsey et al. 2016), we find that environmental attitudes and especially political orientation are strongly correlated with climate skepticism, while socio-economic characteristics are less important.”
ResultPolitical orientation and climate concern shape visual attention to climate change
Whitman, J. C., Zhao, J., Roberts, K. H., & Todd, R. M. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2147-9 · Cited by 30
“Despite the scientific consensus about anthropogenic climate change (Oreskes 2004), widespread public skepticism remains (e.g., Hornsey et al. 2016; Hulme 2009; Poortinga et al. 2011; Rainie et al. 2015; Weber and Stern 2011).”
BackgroundDeveloping science tabletop games: ‘Catan’® and global warming
Illingworth, S., & Wake, P. (2019) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.18040204 · Cited by 30
“previous studies [see e.g. Adger et al., 2009; Hornsey et al., 2016; Mcloughlin et al., 2018] have pointed to the potential barriers that might arise from the use of the term “global warming” this is something that we have yet to observe.”
ResultSkarstein, F., & Wolff, L.-A. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10020028 · Cited by 37
Skarstein, F. (2020) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1728233 · Cited by 28
The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension
Stanley, S. K., Klas, A., Clarke, E. J. R., & Walker, I. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246058 · Cited by 26
“While the temporal framing effect did not replicate in our studies, the associations between ideology and environmentalism were consistent with previous research and add to the literature on the ideological divide in pro-environmentalism that is observed in Anglosphere nations [1, 58].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFinding shared meaning in the Anthropocene: engaging diverse perspectives on climate change
Hochachka, G. (2021) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00965-4 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hornsey, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2016-02-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 622-626
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2279692628
- Cited by
- 1,616
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 165 · 2025: 244 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 182 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 22
- FWCI
- 233.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.qut.edu.au
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Keywords
- climate change beliefs, climate change skepticism, political ideology, political orientation, worldview, climate-friendly behavior, climate action intentions, sex differences, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review