Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systems study reveals concurrent activation of AMPK and mTOR by amino acids

Dalle Pezze, Piero, Ruf, Stefanie, Sonntag, Annika G., Langelaar-Makkinje, Miriam, Hall, Philip, Heberle, Alexander M., Razquin Navas, Patricia, van Eunen, Karen, Tölle, Regine C., Schwarz, Jennifer J., Wiese, Heike, Warscheid, Bettina, Deitersen, Jana, Stork, Björn, Fäßler, Erik, Schäuble, Sascha, Hahn, Udo, Horvatovich, Peter, Shanley, Daryl P., Thedieck, Kathrin·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Amino acids (aa) are not only building blocks for proteins, but also signalling molecules, with the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) acting as a key mediator. However, little is known about whether aa, independently of mTORC1, activate other kinases of the mTOR signalling network. To delineate aa-stimulated mTOR network dynamics, we here combine a computational–experimental approach with text mining-enhanced quantitative proteomics. We report that AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) are acutely activated by aa-readdition in an mTORC1-independent manner. AMPK activation by aa is mediated by Ca 2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase β (CaMKKβ). In response, AMPK impinges on the autophagy regulators Unc-51-like kinase-1 (ULK1) and c-Jun. AMPK is widely recognized as an mTORC1 antagonist that is activated by starvation. We find that aa acutely activate AMPK concurrently with mTOR. We show that AMPK under aa sufficiency acts to sustain autophagy. This may be required to maintain protein homoeostasis and deliver metabolite intermediates for biosynthetic processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms13254

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Laplante, M. & Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 149, 274–293 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Jewell, J. L. & Guan, K. L. Nutrient signaling to mTOR and cell growth. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 233–242 (2013). · DOI
  3. Dalle Pezze, P. et al. A dynamic network model of mTOR signaling reveals TSC-independent mTORC2 regulation. Sci. Signal. 5, ra25 (2012).
  4. Shimobayashi, M. & Hall, M. N. Multiple amino acid sensing inputs to mTORC1. Cell Res. 26, 7–20 (2016). · DOI
  5. Heberle, A. M. et al. Molecular mechanisms of mTOR regulation by stress. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 2, e970489 (2015). · DOI
  6. Chauvin, C. et al. Ribosomal protein S6 kinase activity controls the ribosome biogenesis transcriptional program. Oncogene 33, 474–483 (2014). · DOI
  7. Giraud, J., Leshan, R., Lee, Y. H. & White, M. F. Nutrient-dependent and insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 on serine 302 correlates with increased insulin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3447–3454 (2004). · DOI
  8. Danielsson, A., Ost, A., Nystrom, F. H. & Stralfors, P. Attenuation of insulin-stimulated insulin receptor substrate-1 serine 307 phosphorylation in insulin resistance of type 2 diabetes. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 34389–34392 (2005). · DOI
  9. Weigert, C. et al. Interplay and effects of temporal changes in the phosphorylation state of serine-302, -307, and -318 of insulin receptor substrate-1 on insulin action in skeletal muscle cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 22, 2729–2740 (2008). · DOI
  10. Ost, A. et al. Attenuated mTOR signaling and enhanced autophagy in adipocytes from obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Mol. Med. 16, 235–246 (2010). · DOI
  11. Brannmark, C. et al. Insulin signaling in type 2 diabetes: experimental and modeling analyses reveal mechanisms of insulin resistance in human adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 9867–9880 (2013). · DOI
  12. Hindupur, S. K., Gonzalez, A. & Hall, M. N. The opposing actions of target of rapamycin and AMP-activated protein kinase in cell growth control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a019141 (2015). · DOI
  13. Kaur, J. & Debnath, J. Autophagy at the crossroads of catabolism and anabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 461–472 (2015). · DOI
  14. Spangenburg, E. E., Le Roith, D., Ward, C. W. & Bodine, S. C. A functional insulin-like growth factor receptor is not necessary for load-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J. Physiol. 586, 283–291 (2008). · DOI
  15. Hornberger, T. A. et al. Mechanical stimuli regulate rapamycin-sensitive signalling by a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-, protein kinase B- and growth factor-independent mechanism. Biochem. J. 380, 795–804 (2004). · DOI
  16. Sonntag, A. G., Dalle Pezze, P., Shanley, D. P. & Thedieck, K. A modelling-experimental approach reveals insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-dependent regulation of adenosine monosphosphate-dependent kinase (AMPK) by insulin. FEBS J. 279, 3314–3328 (2012). · DOI
  17. Herrera, R. & Rosen, O. M. Autophosphorylation of the insulin receptor in vitro. Designation of phosphorylation sites and correlation with receptor kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11980–11985 (1986). · DOI
  18. Ellis, L. et al. Mechanisms of receptor-mediated transmembrane communication. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 51, (Pt 2): 773–784 (1986). · DOI
  19. Dibble, C. C. & Cantley, L. C. Regulation of mTORC1 by PI3K signaling. Trends Cell. Biol. 25, 545–555 (2015). · DOI
  20. Soliman, G. A. et al. mTOR Ser-2481 autophosphorylation monitors mTORC-specific catalytic activity and clarifies rapamycin mechanism of action. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 7866–7879 (2010). · DOI
  21. Harrington, L. S. et al. The TSC1-2 tumor suppressor controls insulin-PI3K signaling via regulation of IRS proteins. J. Cell Biol. 166, 213–223 (2004). · DOI
  22. Briaud, I. et al. Insulin receptor substrate-2 proteasomal degradation mediated by a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-induced negative feedback down-regulates protein kinase B-mediated signaling pathway in beta-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 2282–2293 (2005). · DOI
  23. Tzatsos, A. & Kandror, K. V. Nutrients suppress phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling via raptor-dependent mTOR-mediated insulin receptor substrate 1 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 63–76 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Brunn, G. J. et al. Direct inhibition of the signaling functions of the mammalian target of rapamycin by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, wortmannin and LY294002. EMBO J. 15, 5256–5267 (1996). · DOI
  25. Yoon, M. S., Du, G., Backer, J. M., Frohman, M. A. & Chen, J. Class III PI-3-kinase activates phospholipase D in an amino acid-sensing mTORC1 pathway. J. Cell Biol. 195, 435–447 (2011). · DOI
  26. Hirai, H. et al. MK-2206, an allosteric Akt inhibitor, enhances antitumor efficacy by standard chemotherapeutic agents or molecular targeted drugs in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer. Ther. 9, 1956–1967 (2010). · DOI
  27. Garcia-Martinez, J. M. et al. Ku-0063794 is a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Biochem. J. 421, 29–42 (2009). · DOI
  28. Tato, I., Bartrons, R., Ventura, F. & Rosa, J. L. Amino acids activate mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) via PI3K/Akt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 6128–6142 (2011). · DOI
  29. Yogev, O., Goldberg, R., Anzi, S., Yogev, O. & Shaulian, E. Jun Proteins Are Starvation-Regulated Inhibitors of Autophagy. Cancer Res. 70, 2318–2327 (2010). · DOI
  30. Fan, S. J. et al. PAT4 levels control amino-acid sensitivity of rapamycin-resistant mTORC1 from the Golgi and affect clinical outcome in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 35, 3004–3015 (2016). · DOI
  31. Jain, P. & Bhalla, U. S. Signaling logic of activity-triggered dendritic protein synthesis: an mTOR gate but not a feedback switch. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000287 (2009). · DOI
  32. Vinod, P. K. & Venkatesh, K. V. Quantification of the effect of amino acids on an integrated mTOR and insulin signaling pathway. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1163–1173 (2009). · DOI
  33. Sanchez Canedo, C. et al. Activation of the cardiac mTOR/p70S6K pathway by leucine requires PDK1 and correlates with PRAS40 phosphorylation. J. Article 298, E761–E769 (2010).
  34. Ghislat, G., Patron, M., Rizzuto, R. & Knecht, E. Withdrawal of essential amino acids increases autophagy by a pathway involving Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase-beta (CaMKK-beta). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 38625–38636 (2012). · DOI
  35. Kim, J. H. et al. The glutamate agonist homocysteine sulfinic acid stimulates glucose uptake through the calcium-dependent AMPK-p38 MAPK-protein kinase C zeta pathway in skeletal muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 7567–7576 (2011). · DOI
  36. Du, M., Shen, Q. W., Zhu, M. J. & Ford, S. P. Leucine stimulates mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in C2C12 myoblasts in part through inhibition of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 919–927 (2007). · DOI
  37. Gleason, C. E., Lu, D., Witters, L. A., Newgard, C. B. & Birnbaum, M. J. The role of AMPK and mTOR in nutrient sensing in pancreatic beta-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 10341–10351 (2007). · DOI
  38. Saha, A. K. et al. Downregulation of AMPK accompanies leucine- and glucose-induced increases in protein synthesis and insulin resistance in rat skeletal muscle. Diabetes 59, 2426–2434 (2010). · DOI
  39. Sun, Y., Connors, K. E. & Yang, D. Q. AICAR induces phosphorylation of AMPK in an ATM-dependent, LKB1-independent manner. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 306, 239–245 (2007). · DOI
  40. Suzuki, A. et al. IGF-1 phosphorylates AMPK-alpha subunit in ATM-dependent and LKB1-independent manner. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324, 986–992 (2004). · DOI
  41. Yano, S., Tokumitsu, H. & Soderling, T. R. Calcium promotes cell survival through CaM-K kinase activation of the protein-kinase-B pathway. Nature 396, 584–587 (1998). · DOI
  42. Conigrave, A. D., Quinn, S. J. & Brown, E. M. L-amino acid sensing by the extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4814–4819 (2000). · DOI
  43. Handlogten, M. E., Huang, C., Shiraishi, N., Awata, H. & Miller, R. T. The Ca2+-sensing receptor activates cytosolic phospholipase A2 via a Gqalpha -dependent ERK-independent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13941–13948 (2001). · DOI
  44. Gray, E. et al. Activation of the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor initiates insulin secretion from human islets of Langerhans: involvement of protein kinases. J. Endocrinol. 190, 703–710 (2006). · DOI
  45. Kim, S. Y. et al. AMP-activated protein kinase-α1 as an activating kinase of TGF-β-activated kinase 1 has a key role in inflammatory signals. Cell Death Dis. 3, e357 (2012). · DOI
  46. Hara, K. et al. Amino Acid Sufficiency and mTOR Regulate p70 S6 Kinase and eIF-4E BP1 through a Common Effector Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14484–14494 (1998). · DOI
  47. Neufeld, T. P. Autophagy and cell growth – the yin and yang of nutrient responses. J. Cell. Sci. 125, 2359–2368 (2012).
  48. Conn, C. S. & Qian, S. B. mTOR signaling in protein homeostasis: less is more? Cell Cycle 10, 1940–1947 (2011). · DOI
  49. Ciechanover, A. & Kwon, Y. T. Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies. Exp. Mol. Med. 47, e147 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Thedieck, K. et al. PRAS40 and PRR5-like protein are new mTOR interactors that regulate apoptosis. PLoS ONE 2, e1217 (2007). · DOI
  51. Uphoff, C. C. & Drexler, H. G. Detection of mycoplasma in leukemia-lymphoma cell lines using polymerase chain reaction. Leukemia 16, 289–293 (2002). · DOI
  52. Cheong, H., Lindsten, T., Wu, J., Lu, C. & Thompson, C. B. Ammonia-induced autophagy is independent of ULK1/ULK2 kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11121–11126 (2011). · DOI
  53. Blinov, M. L., Faeder, J. R., Goldstein, B. & Hlavacek, W. S. BioNetGen: software for rule-based modeling of signal transduction based on the interactions of molecular domains. Bioinformatics. 20, 3289–3291 (2004). · DOI
  54. Maiwald, T. & Timmer, J. Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with PottersWheel. Bioinformatics. 24, 2037–2043 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Hengl, S., Kreutz, C., Timmer, J. & Maiwald, T. Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models. Bioinformatics. 23, 2612–2618 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Hucka, M. et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics. 19, 524–531 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Funahashi, A., Morohashi, M., Kitano, H. & Tanimura, N. CellDesigner: a process diagram editor for gene-regulatory and biochemical networks. BIOSILICO. 1, 159–162 (2003). · DOI
  58. Le Novere, N. et al. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 735–741 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Schwarz, J. J. et al. Functional proteomics identifies acinus L as a direct insulin- and amino acid-dependent mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) substrate. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 14, 2042–2055 (2015). · DOI
  60. Wiese, H. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals the protein tyrosine kinase Pyk2 as a central effector of olfactory receptor signaling in prostate cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1854, 632–640 (2015). · DOI
  61. Rappsilber, J., Ishihama, Y. & Mann, M. Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal. Chem. 75, 663–670 (2003). · DOI
  62. Tyanova, S., Mann, M. & Cox, J. In: Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) ed. Warscheid B. Springer: New York, (2014).
  63. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotech. 26, 1367–1372 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  64. Boutet, E. et al. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to Use the Entry View. Methods Mol. Biol. 1374, 23–54 (2016). · DOI
  65. Vizcaíno, J. A. et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally co-ordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 223–226 (2014). · DOI
  66. Kim, J. D. et al. The genia event and Protein coreference tasks of the BioNLP shared task 2011. BMC Bioinfo. 13, (Suppl 11): S1 (2012). · DOI
  67. Hahn, U., Matthies, F., Faessler, E. & Hellrich, J. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2502–2509Portorož, Slovenia (2016).
  68. Wermter, J., Tomanek, K. & Hahn, U. High-performance gene name normalization with GeNo. Bioinformatics 25, 815–821 (2009). · DOI
  69. Sayers, E. In: A General Introduction to the E-Utilities National Center for Biotechnology Information (US) Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25497/ (2010).
  70. Bui, Q.-C. & Sloot, P. M. A. A robust approach to extract biomedical events from literature. Bioinformatics 28, 2654–2661 (2012). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 148

Metadata

Authors
Dalle Pezze, P., Ruf, S., Sonntag, A. G., Langelaar-Makkinje, M., Hall, P., Heberle, A. M., Razquin Navas, P., van Eunen, K., Tölle, R. C., Schwarz, J. J., Wiese, H., Warscheid, B., Deitersen, J., Stork, B., Fäßler, E., Schäuble, S., Hahn, U., Horvatovich, P., Shanley, D. P., & Thedieck, K.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
148
References
16
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review