Cited by 282Photochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics

Quantum coherence controls the charge separation in a prototypical artificial light-harvesting system

Open access
Andrea Rozzi, Carlo, Maria Falke, Sarah, Spallanzani, Nicola, Rubio, Angel, Molinari, Elisa, Brida, Daniele, Maiuri, Margherita, Cerullo, Giulio +3 more·2013·Nature Communications

Abstract

The efficient conversion of light into electricity or chemical fuels is a fundamental challenge. In artificial photosynthetic and photovoltaic devices, this conversion is generally thought to happen on ultrafast, femto-to-picosecond timescales and to involve an incoherent electron transfer process. In some biological systems, however, there is growing evidence that the coherent motion of electronic wavepackets is an essential primary step, raising questions about the role of quantum coherence in artificial devices. Here we investigate the primary charge-transfer process in a supramolecular triad, a prototypical artificial reaction centre. Combining high time-resolution femtosecond spectroscopy and time-dependent density functional theory, we provide compelling evidence that the driving mechanism of the photoinduced current generation cycle is a correlated wavelike motion of electrons and nuclei on a timescale of few tens of femtoseconds. We highlight the fundamental role of the interface between chromophore and charge acceptor in triggering the coherent wavelike electron-hole splitting. In artificial photosynthetic devices, conversion of light into electricity is thought to involve an incoherent electron transfer process. Rozzi et al.provide evidence for quantum-correlated wavelike motion inducing the ultrafast photoinduced electronic charge transfer in a light-harvesting supramolecular triad.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms2603

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Investigations of primary charge transfer in a prototypical artificial reaction centre have revealed correlated wave-like motion of electrons and nuclei on a time scale of a few tens of femtoseconds as a driving mechanism of the photoinduced current generation cycle.

    “Investigations of primary charge transfer in a prototypical artificial reaction centre have revealed correlated wave-like motion of electrons and nuclei on a time scale of a few tens of femtoseconds as a driving mechanism of the photoinduced current generation cycle [76].”

    From The future of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrea Rozzi, C., Maria Falke, S., Spallanzani, N., Rubio, A., Molinari, E., Brida, D., Maiuri, M., Cerullo, G., Schramm, H., Christoffers, J., & Lienau, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Lienau, Christoph
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2013-03-19
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1602-1602
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013765201
Cited by
282
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • European Commission (280879)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP-1391)
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CSD2010-00044, PIB2010US-00652)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (267374, 291198)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Keywords
quantum coherence, charge separation, artificial light-harvesting systems, photoinduced charge transfer, ultrafast electron dynamics, artificial photosynthesis, femtosecond spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review