CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated spatial multiplexing of heralded single-photon sources

Collins, M.J., Xiong, C., Rey, I.H., Vo, T.D., He, J., Shahnia, S., Reardon, C., Krauss, T.F., Steel, M.J., Clark, A.S., Eggleton, B.J.·2013·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/ncomms3582PMC PMC3826656
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms3582

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Photons with 99.1% single-photon purity, 66% extraction efficiency, and 98.5% indistinguishability have been produced in a single quantum dot.

    “Photons with a 99.1% (99.7%) single-photon purity, 66% (65%) extraction efficiency, and 98.5% (99.6%) indistinguishability have been produced in a single QD [53] (in several QDs samples [54]).”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Martin-Lopez, E. et al. Experimental realization of Shor's algorithm using qubit recycling. Nat. Photon. 6, 773–776 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Spring, J. B. et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339, 798–801 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tillmann, M. et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 7, 540–544 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nat. Photon. 1, 165–171 (2007). · DOI
  5. Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O'Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K. & Takeuchi, S. Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons. Science 316, 726–729 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Polyakov, S. V. et al. Coalesence of single photons emitted by disparate single-photons sources: the example of InAs quantum dots and parametric down-conversion sources. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 157402 (2011). · DOI
  7. Jelezko, F. et al. Single defect centres in diamond: A review. Phys. Status Solidi A 203, 3207–3225 (2006). · DOI
  8. Migdall, A. L., Branning, D. & Castelletto, S. Tailoring single-photon and multiphoton probabilities of a single-photon on-demand source. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053805 (2002). · DOI
  9. Sharping, J. E. et al. Generation of correlated photons in nanoscale silicon waveguides. Opt. Express 14, 12388–12393 (2006). · DOI
  10. Takesue, H. et al. Entanglement generation using silicon wire waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 201108 (2007). · DOI
  11. Clemmen, S. et al. Continuous wave photon pair generation in silicon-on-insulator waveguides and ring resonators. Opt. Express 17, 16558–16657 (2009). · DOI
  12. Xiong, C. et al. Characterisitics of correlated photon pairs generated in ultracompact silicon slow-light photonic crystal waveguides. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 1676–1683 (2012). · DOI
  13. Collins, M. J. et al. Low Raman-noise correlated photon-pair generation in a dispersion-engineered chalcogenide As2S3 planar waveguide. Opt. Lett. 37, 3393–3395 (2012). · DOI
  14. Davanço, M. et al. Telecommunications-band heralded single photons from a silicon nanophotonic chip. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 261104 (2012). · DOI
  15. Jiang, W. C., Lu, X., Zhang, J., Painter, O. & Lin, Q. A silicon-chip source of bright photon-pair comb. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4455v1 (2012). · DOI
  16. Chen, J., Pearlman, A. J., Ling, A., Fan, J. & Migdall, A. A versatile waveguide source of photon. Opt. Express 17, 6727–6740 (2006). · DOI
  17. Hunault, M., Takesue, H., Tadanaga, O., Nishida, Y. & Asobe, M. Generation of time-bin entangled photon pairs by cascaded second-order nonlinearity in a single periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguide. Opt. Lett. 35, 1239–1241 (2010). · DOI
  18. De Riedmatten, H. et al. Two independent photon pairs versus four-photon entangled states in parametric down conversion. J. Mod. Opt. 51, 1637–1649 (2004). · DOI
  19. Takesue, H. & Shimizu, K. Effects of multiple pairs on visibility measurements of entangled photons generated by spontaneous parametric processes. Opt. Commun. 283, 276–287 (2010). · DOI
  20. Spring, J. B. et al. On-chip low loss heralded source of pure single photons. Opt. Express 21, 13522–13532 (2013). · DOI
  21. Harder, G. et al. An optimized photon pair source for quantum circuits. Opt. Express 21, 13975–13985 (2013). · DOI
  22. Takesue, H. & Inoue, K. 1.5-μm band quantum-correlated photon pair generation in dispersion-shifted fiber: suppression of noise photons by cooling fiber. Opt. Express 13, 7832–7838 (2005). · DOI
  23. Politi, A., Matthews, J. C. F. & O’Brien, J. L. Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm on a photonic chip. Science 325, 1221 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Shapiro, J. H. & Wong, F. N. C. On-demand single-photon generation using a modular array of parametric downconverters with electro-optic polarization controls. Opt. Lett. 32, 2698–2700 (2007). · DOI
  25. Ma, X.-S., Zotter, S., Kofler, J., Jennewein, T. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing. Phys. Rev. A 83, 043814 (2011). · DOI
  26. Mower, J. & Englund, D. Efficient generation of single and entangled photons on a silicon photonic integrated chip. Phys. Rev. A 84, 052326 (2011). · DOI
  27. Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S. & O’Brien, J. L. Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science 320, 646–649 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Shadbolt, P. J. et al. Generating, manipulating, and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Nat. Photon. 6, 45–49 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Jiang, H. et al. Transparent electro-optic ceramics and devices. Proc. SPIE 5644, Optoelectronic Devices and Integration380 (2005). · DOI
  30. Li, J., White, T. P., O’Faolain, L., Gomez-Iglesias, A. & Krauss, T. F. Systematic design of flat band slow light in photonic crystal waveguide. Opt. Express 16, 6227–6232 (2008). · DOI
  31. Li, J., O'Faolain, L., Rey, I. H. & Krauss, T. F. Four-wave mixing in photonic crystal waveguides: slow light enhancement and limitations. Opt. Express 19, 4458–4463 (2011). · DOI
  32. Tsuchizawa, T. et al. Microphotonics devices based on silicon microfabrication technology. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 11, 232–240 (2005). · DOI
  33. Dai, D. et al. Low-loss Si3N4 arrayed-waveguide grating (de)multiplexer using nano-core optical waveguides. Opt. Express 19, 14130–14136 (2011). · DOI
  34. Sprengers, J. P. et al. Waveguide superconducting single-photon detectors for integrated quantum photonic circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 181110 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lee, H., Chen, T., Li, J., Painter, O. & Vahala, K. J. Ultra-low-loss optical delay line on a silicon chip. Nat. Commun. 3, 867 (2012). · DOI
  36. Broome, M. A., Almeida, M. P., Fedrizzi, A. & White, A. G. Reducing multi-photon rates in pulsed down-conversion by temporal multiplexing. Opt. Express 19, 545–550 (2011). · DOI
  37. Beck, M. Comparing measurements of g(2)(0) performed with different coincidence detection techniques. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 2972–2978 (2007). · DOI
  38. Jeffrey, E., Peters, N. A. & Kwiat, P. G. Towards a periodic deterministic source of arbitrary single-photons. New J. Phys. 6, 100 (2004). · DOI
  39. Martin, A., Alibart, O., De Micheli, M. P., Ostrowsky, D. B. & Tanzilli, S. A quantum relay chip based on telecommunication integrated optics technology. New J. Phys. 14, 025002 (2012). · DOI
  40. Clark, A. S., Fulconis, J., Wadsworth, W. J., Rarity, J. G. & O’Brien, J. L. All-optical-fiber polarization-based quantum logic gate. Phys. Rev. A 79, 030303 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Xiong, C. et al. Slow-light enhanced correlated photon-pair generation in silicon. Opt. Lett. 36, 3413–3415 (2011). · DOI
  42. Husko, C. et al. Multi-photon absorption limits to heralded single photon sources. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.4498v1 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Collins, M. J., Xiong, C., Rey, I. H., Vo, T. D., He, J., Shahnia, S., Reardon, C., Krauss, T. F., Steel, M. J., Clark, A. S., & Eggleton, B. J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-10-10
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
DOI
10.1038/ncomms3582
PMC
PMC3826656
Cited by
270
References
8
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review