The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive rheology and ordering of cell cytoskeleton govern matrix rigidity sensing
Open accessAbstract
Matrix rigidity sensing regulates a large variety of cellular processes and has important implications for tissue development and disease. However, how cells probe matrix rigidity, and hence respond to it, remains unclear. Here, we show that rigidity sensing and adaptation emerge naturally from actin cytoskeleton remodelling. Our in vitro experiments and theoretical modelling demonstrate a biphasic rheology of the actin cytoskeleton, which transitions from fluid on soft substrates to solid on stiffer ones. Furthermore, we find that increasing substrate stiffness correlates with the emergence of an orientational order in actin stress fibres, which exhibit an isotropic to nematic transition that we characterize quantitatively in the framework of active matter theory. These findings imply mechanisms mediated by a large-scale reinforcement of actin structures under stress, which could be the mechanical drivers of substrate stiffness-dependent cell shape changes and cell polarity. Adherent cells actively probe the rigidity of their substrates. Guptaet al. show that actin cytoskeleton rheology transitions from fluid to solid with increased substrate stiffness along with an isotropic to nematic ordering, implicating the remodelling of the whole actin network in rigidity sensing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate
Lo, C.-M., Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M., & Wang, Y.-L. (2000) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76279-5 · Cited by 3,289
Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion
Yeung, T., Georges, P. C., Flanagan, L. A., Marg, B., Ortiz, M., Funaki, M., Zahir, N., Ming, W., Weaver, V., & Janmey, P. A. (2005) · Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.20041 · Cited by 2,325
Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness
Engler, A. J., Griffin, M. A., Sen, S., Bönnemann, C. G., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200405004 · Cited by 1,743
Jaalouk, D. E., & Lammerding, J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2597 · Cited by 1,396
Cited by
Elosegui-Artola, A., Oria, R., Chen, Y., Kosmalska, A., Pérez-González, C., Castro, N., Zhu, C., Trepat, X., & Roca-Cusachs, P. (2016) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3336 · Cited by 858
Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours
Ladoux, B., & Mège, R.-M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.98 · Cited by 749
Self-citationMechanics and functional consequences of nuclear deformations
Kalukula, Y., Stephens, A. D., Lammerding, J., & Gabriele, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00480-z · Cited by 475
Janmey, P. A., Fletcher, D. A., & Reinhart-King, C. A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2019 · Cited by 422
Physical Models of Collective Cell Migration
Alert, R., & Trepat, X. (2020) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013516 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, M., Sarangi, B. R., Deschamps, J., Nematbakhsh, Y., Callan-Jones, A., Margadant, F., Mège, R.-M., Lim, C. T., Voituriez, R., & Ladoux, B.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-06-25
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7525-7525
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2273560121
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.