Cited by 71interferon and immune responsesImmune Response and InflammationGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

TRIM33 switches off Ifnb1 gene transcription during the late phase of macrophage activation

Open access
Ferri, Federica, Parcelier, Aude, Petit, Vanessa, Gallouet, Anne-Sophie, Lewandowski, Daniel, Dalloz, Marion, van den Heuvel, Anita, Kolovos, Petros +6 more·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Despite its importance during viral or bacterial infections, transcriptional regulation of the interferon-β gene ( Ifnb1 ) in activated macrophages is only partially understood. Here we report that TRIM33 deficiency results in high, sustained expression of Ifnb1 at late stages of toll-like receptor-mediated activation in macrophages but not in fibroblasts. In macrophages, TRIM33 is recruited by PU.1 to a conserved region, the Ifnb1 Control Element (ICE), located 15 kb upstream of the Ifnb1 transcription start site. ICE constitutively interacts with Ifnb1 through a TRIM33-independent chromatin loop. At late phases of lipopolysaccharide activation of macrophages, TRIM33 is bound to ICE, regulates Ifnb1 enhanceosome loading, controls Ifnb1 chromatin structure and represses Ifnb1 gene transcription by preventing recruitment of CBP/p300. These results characterize a previously unknown mechanism of macrophage-specific regulation of Ifnb1 transcription whereby TRIM33 is critical for Ifnb1 gene transcription shutdown.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

TRIM33 is recruited by PU.1 to a distal Ifnb1 control element (ICE) 15 kb upstream of the Ifnb1 TSS, where it represses Ifnb1 transcription during the late phase of macrophage activation. TRIM33 deficiency causes sustained Ifnb1 expression and IFN-β secretion after LPS or poly(I:C) activation, associated with persistent enhanceosome loading and CBP/p300 recruitment.

Key findings

  • In WT BMDM and peritoneal macrophages, Ifnb1 mRNA returned to basal levels by 6 h after LPS, whereas in Trim33−/− macrophages it decreased between 2 and 4 h, rose significantly by 6 h, and remained high 24 h after LPS; poly(I:C) also produced higher late Ifnb1 mRNA in Trim33−/− BMDM.
  • TRIM33 ChIP-seq showed a single peak at the Ifnb1 locus overlapping a PU.1 peak 15 kb upstream of the TSS, named ICE; no TRIM33 occupancy was seen at the promoter/enhanceosome region. ICE reporter activity was four- to tenfold lower than the Ifnb1 promoter alone in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells.
  • In Trim33−/− BMDM, p65 and c-jun remained bound to the Ifnb1 promoter at 24 h, Pol II occupancy and H3K4me3 persisted up to 24 h, and H3ac on the Ifnb1 promoter increased 5- to 8-fold at 10 and 24 h, with CBP/p300 binding at 10 and 24 h. The CBP/p300 inhibitor C646 reversed sustained Ifnb1 transcription in Trim33−/− BMDM at 10 and 24 h.
  • 3C-seq showed a constitutive ICE–Ifnb1 loop in WT BMDM that was twofold stronger 24 h after LPS and was not significantly modified by Trim33 deletion.

Methods

  • Mice with myeloid Trim33 deletion were generated by crossing Trim33fl/fl mice with LyzCre mice; experiments used BMDM, peritoneal macrophages, immortalized macrophages, RAW 264.7, and NIH3T3 cells activated with LPS or poly(I:C).
  • Main assays included quantitative RT-PCR, IFN-β ELISA, ChIP and ChIP-seq, 3C-seq, luciferase reporter assays, shRNA-mediated TRIM33 knockdown, lentiviral rescue with full-length or mutant TRIM33, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated ICE deletions.
  • Sequencing data were deposited under GEO accession codes GSE73322 (3C-seq) and GSE43654 (ChIP-seq).

Limitations

  • The paper states that the lentiviral CRISPR/Cas9 system may increase off-target effects, though similar results with three clones and different gRNAs made this less likely; definitive proof would require recombinant Cas9 protein or highly efficient transient transfection.
  • The paper states that PU.1 expression plus TRIM33 deficiency in NIH3T3 cells did not produce the sustained late Ifnb1 expression seen in BMDM, indicating additional factors present in BMDM but not fibroblasts are required.
  • Evident from the text: the mechanism is proposed as a model in which TRIM33 competes with CBP/p300 for PU.1 binding, but whether TRIM33 acts directly or through trans-acting factors such as p65 is not resolved; the work relies on cultured macrophages and cell lines rather than in vivo infection models.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms9900

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 13 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    In fibroblast cell lines, ICE acts as an enhancer of Ifnb1 promoter activity, but only after viral infection.

    “Transient transfection in fibroblast cell lines shows that ICE acts as an enhancer of Ifnb1 promoter activity, but only after viral infection22.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Banerjee, A. R., Kim, Y. J. & Kim, T. H. A novel virus-inducible enhancer of the interferon-beta gene with tightly linked promoter and enhancer activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 12537–12554 (2014) . source

      In Results (‘L2 is capable of acting on the IFNB1 promoter and proximal enhancer’; page unavailable), the paper reports that L2F increased IFNB1 promoter-reporter activity after viral infection but had no meaningful effect in uninfected cells. Methods (‘Cells and treatment’; page unavailable) describe fibroblast cells and transient transfections. The copy calls the tested element L2F, however, and does not identify it as ICE, so that identification is not verified. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    In macrophages, TRIM33 is recruited by PU.1 to a conserved region, the Ifnb1 Control Element (ICE), located 15 kb upstream of the Ifnb1 transcription start site.

    “In macrophages, TRIM33 is recruited by PU.1 to a conserved region, the Ifnb1 Control Element (ICE), located 15 kb upstream of the Ifnb1 transcription start site.”
    • Also stated in: § TRIM33 binds a distal Ifnb1 regulatory element · plain
      “TRIM33 ChIP-seq data obtained from the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line or from BMDM treated with LPS for 24 h showed a single TRIM33 peak at the Ifnb1 locus that overlapped with a PU.1 peak located 15 kb upstream from the Ifnb1 TSS”
    • Also stated in: § TRIM33 binds a distal Ifnb1 regulatory element · hedged
      “PU.1 binding at the Ifnb1 promoter and at ICE was constitutive and detected in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM (Fig. 2b, middle and right panels) indicating that PU.1 binding to ICE was not TRIM33-dependent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • Findingown data

    The increased H3ac on ICE in Trim33−/− BMDM is associated with a transient increase of CBP/p300 HAT binding on ICE 10 h after LPS activation.

    “This increased H3ac on ICE in Trim33−/− BMDM was associated with transient increase of CBP/p300 histone H3 acetyl-transferase (HAT) -binding on ICE 10 h after LPS activation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • Findingown data

    TRIM33 deficiency does not affect Ifna mRNA kinetics in BMDM.

    “quantitative RT-PCR was performed and showed similar kinetics of Ifna mRNA levels in WT or Trim33−/− BMDM with no late increased expression of Ifna mRNA levels in Trim33−/− BMDM”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • Findingown data

    shRNA-mediated depletion of TRIM33 in NIH3T3 cells does not modify kinetics of Ifnb1 mRNA levels in response to poly(I:C).

    “highly efficient shRNA-mediated depletion of TRIM33 in NIH3T3 cells (NIH3T3 TRIM33−; Supplementary Fig. 1e) did not modify kinetics of Ifnb1 mRNA levels in response to poly(I:C)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • May combine two claims. 42
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ICE has been shown to interact with the Ifnb1 promoter in human fibroblasts in the absence of any viral infection.

    “ICE has been recently shown to interact with the Ifnb1 promoter in human fibroblasts in the absence of any viral infection22.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Banerjee, A. R., Kim, Y. J. & Kim, T. H. A novel virus-inducible enhancer of the interferon-beta gene with tightly linked promoter and enhancer activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 12537–12554 (2014) . source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several TRIM proteins regulate production and action of IFN-β during innate immune response.

    “Several TRIM proteins regulate production and action of IFN-β during innate immune response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [34] Rajsbaum, R. et al. Unanchored K48-linked polyubiquitin synthesized by the E3-ubiquitin ligase TRIM6 stimulates the interferon-IKKepsilon kinase-mediated antiviral response. Immunity 40, 880–895 (2014) . source
    • cites [35] Inn, K. S. et al. Linear ubiquitin assembly complex negatively regulates RIG-I- and TRIM25-mediated type I interferon induction. Mol. Cell 41, 354–365 (2011) . source

      The Results section ('HOIL-1L/HOIP complex negatively regulates RIG-I-mediated type-I IFN induction'; page unavailable) shows that TRIM25 promotes RIG-I-mediated IFN-β promoter activation. The paper supports a role for TRIM25 in IFN-β production, but does not establish that several TRIM proteins regulate it or that they regulate IFN-β’s action. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [36] Higgs, R. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Ro52 negatively regulates IFN-beta production post-pathogen recognition by polyubiquitin-mediated degradation of IRF3. J. Immunol. 181, 1780–1786 (2008) . source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that Ro52/TRIM21 limits IFN-β production by promoting IRF3 degradation. The Introduction (page unavailable) also identifies TRIM5α and TRIM25 as important in antiviral defense, but does not establish that several TRIM proteins regulate IFN-β production or its action specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PU.1 can interact with CBP/p300 and TRIM33.

    “as PU.1 can interact with CBP/p300 (refs 39, 40) and TRIM33”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] Yamamoto, H., Kihara-Negishi, F., Yamada, T., Hashimoto, Y. & Oikawa, T. Physical and functional interactions between the transcription factor PU.1 and the coactivator CBP. Oncogene 18, 1495–1501 (1999) . source
    • cites [40] Bai, Y., Srinivasan, L., Perkins, L. & Atchison, M. L. Protein acetylation regulates both PU.1 transactivation and Ig kappa 3' enhancer activity. J. Immunol. 175, 5160–5169 (2005) . source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Such enhancer or repressor loop stability has been described during development where they are associated with paused polymerase and in human fibroblasts where TNF-α-responsive enhancers contact their target promoters before TNF-α activation.

    “Such enhancer or repressor loop stability has been described during development where they are associated with paused polymerase28 and in human fibroblasts where TNF-α-responsive enhancers contact their target promoters before TNF-α activation29.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512, 96–100 (2014) . source
    • cites [29] Jin, F. et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290–294 (2013) . source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TRIM33 deficiency results in high, sustained expression of Ifnb1 at late stages of toll-like receptor-mediated activation in macrophages but not in fibroblasts.

    “Here we report that TRIM33 deficiency results in high, sustained expression of Ifnb1 at late stages of toll-like receptor-mediated activation in macrophages but not in fibroblasts.”
    • Also stated in: § TRIM33 controls Ifnb1 expression in activated macrophages · plain
      “Altogether, these results show that TRIM33 deficiency is associated with increased Ifnb1 mRNA level associated with IFN-β secretion during the late stages of LPS activation of BMDM.”
    • Also stated in: § TRIM33 controls Ifnb1 expression in activated macrophages · hedged
      “Finally, highly efficient shRNA-mediated depletion of TRIM33 in NIH3T3 cells (NIH3T3 TRIM33−; Supplementary Fig. 1e) did not modify kinetics of Ifnb1 mRNA levels in response to poly(I:C) (Fig. 1f), indicating cell-specificity in the regulation of Ifnb1 expression by TRIM33.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
    • Rests on an assumption: The LyzCre-mediated deletion of Trim33 in macrophages does not cause developmental or compensatory changes that confound the Ifnb1 phenotype.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In LPS-activated WT and Trim33−/− iM, Ifnb1 mRNA increases 1 h after activation and peaks at 2 h, with twofold higher expression in WT iM than in Trim33−/− iM.

    “Ifnb1 mRNA levels increased 1 h after LPS activation of WT and Trim33−/− iM and peaked at 2 h with twofold higher observed expression in WT iM than in Trim33−/− iM”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    These epigenetic modifications are present in ST-HSCs and myeloid cells, but not in mature erythroid and lymphoid cells.

    “These epigenetic modifications are present in short-term haematopoietic stem cells (ST-HSCs) and in myeloid cells, but not in mature erythroid and lymphoid cells”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ref. 24

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In WT BMDM and PM activated by LPS, Ifnb1 mRNA levels decrease from 2 h (BMDM) or 4 h (PM) and return to basal by 6 h, whereas in Trim33−/− BMDM and PM they rise significantly by 6 h and remain high 24 h after LPS.

    “Thereafter, Ifnb1 mRNA levels decreased from 2 h in WT BMDM (or 4 h in WT PM) and returned to basal levels by 6 h in WT BMDM and PM. In contrast, although Ifnb1 mRNA levels decreased between 2 and 4 h, Ifnb1 mRNA levels began to rise significantly by 6 h and remained high 24 h after LPS activation in Trim33−/− BMDM or PM”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    RAW 264.7 clones with biallelic deletion of ICE show high and sustained Ifnb1 mRNA levels after LPS or poly(I:C) activation, with highest increase during late phase.

    “In the two clones high and sustained Ifnb1 mRNA levels were found but only after LPS or poly(I:C) activation, with the highest increase being obtained during the late phase of activation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
    • Rests on an assumption: The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of ICE does not affect other regulatory elements or gene function beyond the intended deletion.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TRIM33 deficiency increases Ifnb1 mRNA levels in NIH3T3 PU.1+ cells treated with poly(I:C) but does not result in sustained expression during late stages.

    “TRIM33 deficiency increased Ifnb1 mRNA levels in NIH3T3 PU.1+ cells treated with poly(I:C) but did not result in sustained expression of Ifnb1 during the late stages of poly(I:C) activation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Late sustained Ifnb1 expression is also observed with poly(I:C) in BMDM and PM, with much higher Ifnb1 mRNA at all late time points in poly(I:C)-treated Trim33−/− BMDM compared with WT.

    “This late sustained expression of Ifnb1 was also observed when BMDM and PM were stimulated by poly(I:C) with Ifnb1 mRNA levels being much higher at all late time points in poly(I:C) treated Trim33−/− BMDM compared with WT”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In WT iM, Ifnb1 mRNA levels drop after peak, whereas in Trim33−/− iM they remain high.

    “As anticipated, Ifnb1 mRNA levels in WT iM then dropped, whereas in Trim33−/− iM, Ifnb1 mRNA levels remained high”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Trim33 deletion occurs in monocytes, bone-marrow-derived macrophages, peritoneal macrophages and neutrophils but not in myeloid progenitors or B lymphocytes.

    “PCR genotyping of purified haematopoietic cell populations showed deletion of Trim33 in monocytes, bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM), peritoneal macrophages (PMs) and neutrophils but not in myeloid progenitors, nor in B lymphocytes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    RNA Polymerase II and H3K4me3 are constitutively bound at high levels on ICE.

    “ChIP and ChIP-seq analyses showed a constitutive binding of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) and constitutively high levels of H3K4me3 on ICE”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PU.1 binding at the Ifnb1 promoter and at ICE is constitutive and not TRIM33-dependent.

    “PU.1 binding at the Ifnb1 promoter and at ICE was constitutive and detected in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM (Fig. 2b, middle and right panels) indicating that PU.1 binding to ICE was not TRIM33-dependent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TRIM33 mutants lacking ubiquitin ligase activity or Smad-interaction domain rescue normal Ifnb1 expression at late time points in LPS-activated Trim33−/− iM, whereas a mutant lacking the coiled-coil domain does not.

    “The flag-ΔUb and the flag-ΔSmad rescued normal Ifnb1 expression at late time points of LPS-activated Trim33−/− iM whereas the flag-ΔCC did not rescue normal profile of Ifnb1 expression in activated Trim33−/− iM”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No TRIM33 binding is observed on the Ifnb1 promoter or ICE in NIH3T3 cells, indicating macrophage specificity of TRIM33 binding to ICE.

    “Finally, no TRIM33 binding was observed on the Ifnb1 promoter or ICE in NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 2c), indicating macrophage specificity of TRIM33 in binding to ICE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Human and mouse ICE sequences show 70% homology around the TRIM33/PU.1 peak with consensus binding motifs for AP-1, NF-κB and IRF transcription factors.

    “Comparison of reported human and mouse ICE sequences showed 70% sequence homology around the TRIM33/PU.1 peak with consensus binding motifs for AP-1, NF-κB and IRF transcription factors”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Trim33−/− mice did not display developmental abnormalities and were healthy.

    “Trim33−/− mice did not display developmental abnormalities and were healthy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In LPS-activated RAW ICE+/− cells, Ifnb1 mRNA levels increase comparably to WT but subsequently remain stable, whereas in WT they gradually decrease.

    “In LPS-activated RAW WT cells, Ifnb1 mRNA levels increased during the first 4 h and then gradually decreased (Supplementary Fig. 2e). In contrast, whereas Ifnb1 mRNA levels increased comparably in RAW ICE+/− cells, they subsequently remained stable”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.
    • Rests on an assumption: The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of ICE does not affect other regulatory elements or gene function beyond the intended deletion.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prior to LPS activation, H3ac on ICE is similar in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM; during LPS activation, H3ac on ICE does not change in WT but transiently increases 10 h after LPS in Trim33−/− BMDM.

    “Prior to LPS activation, histone H3 acetylation (H3ac) on ICE was similar in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM (Fig. 3c, left panel). During LPS activation, H3ac on ICE did not change in WT BMDM but was transiently increased 10 h after LPS activation in Trim33−/− BMDM”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In WT BMDM, 3C-seq shows a loop between ICE and the Ifnb1 gene before LPS activation and a twofold stronger interaction 24 h after LPS activation.

    “In WT BMDM, both viewpoints showed a loop between ICE and the Ifnb1 gene before LPS activation and a twofold stronger interaction 24 h after LPS activation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 3C-seq signals reflect physical chromatin loops between ICE and Ifnb1.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TRIM33 ChIP-seq in RAW 264.7 or LPS-treated BMDM shows a single TRIM33 peak at the Ifnb1 locus overlapping a PU.1 peak 15 kb upstream of the Ifnb1 TSS.

    “TRIM33 ChIP-seq data obtained from the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line or from BMDM treated with LPS for 24 h showed a single TRIM33 peak at the Ifnb1 locus that overlapped with a PU.1 peak located 15 kb upstream from the Ifnb1 TSS”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TRIM33 inactivation leads to recruitment of CBP/p300 at the Ifnb1 promoter and enhanced H3ac.

    “First, TRIM33 inactivation led to recruitment of CBP/p300 at the Ifnb1 promoter and enhanced H3ac.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In WT BMDM, Pol II occupancy at TSS and in Ifnb1 3′ region increases after 1 h of LPS and is lost at 4 h; in Trim33−/− BMDM, Pol II occupancy increases after 1 h but is maintained up to 24 h.

    “In WT BMDM, Pol II occupancy at TSS and in Ifnb1 3′ region increased after 1 h of stimulation and then was lost at 4 h (Fig. 4b, upper panels). In Trim33−/− BMDM, Pol II occupancy similarly increased after 1 h of stimulation but its levels were maintained up to 24 h”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    H3K4me3 levels are transiently increased in WT BMDM after 4 h of LPS, whereas in Trim33−/− BMDM persistent and high levels are observed up to 24 h.

    “H3K4me3 levels were transiently increased in WT BMDM after 4 h of LPS stimulation, whereas in Trim33−/− BMDM, persistent and high levels of H3K4me3 were also observed up to 24 h”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adding C646, a CBP/p300 inhibitor, 2 h after LPS induction does not modify Ifnb1 expression in WT BMDM but reverses the high sustained Ifnb1 transcription level in Trim33−/− BMDM at both 10 and 24 h.

    “Adding C646 2 h after LPS induction did not modify Ifnb1 expression in WT BMDM, but reversed the high sustained Ifnb1 transcription level in Trim33−/− BMDMs at both 10 and 24 h”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    PU.1 is not expressed in fibroblasts.

    “Indeed, PU.1, which is not expressed in fibroblasts, is bound to ICE in macrophages and might be involved in the cell-specific function of ICE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In WT BMDM, c-jun and p65 are recruited to the Ifnb1 promoter at 1 h after LPS activation and their binding returns to basal levels after 24 h.

    “As anticipated, in WT BMDM, c-jun and p65 were recruited to the Ifnb1 promoter at early times following LPS activation (1 h), but their binding returned to basal levels after 24 h”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Expression of ectopic full-length flag-TRIM33 in Trim33−/− iM decreases H3ac on the Ifnb1 promoter 7 h after LPS stimulation, whereas flag-ΔCC does not.

    “Expression of ectopic full-length flag-TRIM33 in Trim33−/− iM led to decreased H3ac on the Ifnb1 promoter 7 h after LPS stimulation (Fig. 4d), whereas the flag-ΔCC that could not rescue normal Ifnb1 expression in Trim33−/− iM (Fig. 1h) did not decrease H3ac on the Ifnb1 promoter 7 h after LPS stimulation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prior to LPS activation, histone H3ac on the Ifnb1 promoter is similar in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM; it increases at 1 h in both, returns to basal in WT, but shows a 5- to 8-fold increase at 10 and 24 h in Trim33−/− BMDM.

    “Prior to LPS activation, histone H3ac on the Ifnb1 promoter was similar in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM (Fig. 4c). This H3ac increased at 1 h after LPS activation of WT and Trim33−/− BMDM. It then returned to basal levels in WT BMDM, whereas a 5- to 8-fold increase in H3ac was observed after 10 and 24 h in Trim33−/− BMDM”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Treatment of LPS-activated WT BMDM with trichostatine A, an HDAC inhibitor, does not result in sustained Ifnb1 expression, whereas it alters expression of genes regulated by HDACs.

    “Treatment of LPS-activated WT BMDM with trichostatine A, an inhibitor of HDACs, did not result in sustained Ifnb1 expression, whereas it did alter expression of genes regulated by HDACs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In Trim33−/− BMDM, p65 is loaded onto the enhanceosome during the late phases of LPS activation.

    “This TRIM33-dependent recruitment and activity of CBP/p300 could be direct and/or mediated by trans-acting factors such as p65 that are, in Trim33−/− BMDM, loaded onto the enhanceosome during the late phases of LPS activation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The data describe a new regulatory layer through identification of cis- and trans-acting elements that regulate Ifnb1 gene transcription at specific steps of macrophage activation, but not in fibroblasts.

    “Our data describe a new regulatory layer through identification of cis- and trans-acting elements that regulate Ifnb1 gene transcription at specific steps of macrophage activation, but not in fibroblasts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    TRIM33 deficiency does not modify ICE chromatin signature and only leads to transient increases of H3ac and CBP/p300 recruitment on ICE, whereas sustained high Ifnb1 expression is observed, suggesting TRIM33 bound to ICE might act at a distance.

    “TRIM33 deficiency did not modify ICE chromatin signature and only led to transient increases of H3ac and CBP/p300 recruitment on ICE whereas a sustained high expression of Ifnb1 was observed in LPS-activated Trim33−/− BMDM suggesting that TRIM33 bound to ICE might act at a distance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    TRIM33 can repress Ifnb1 expression in the presence of PU.1, and additional factors not present in NIH3T3 cells are required for TRIM33-mediated late downregulation of Ifnb1 expression.

    “These results show that TRIM33 can repress Ifnb1 expression in presence of PU.1 and indicate that additional factors that are not present in NIH3T3 cells are required for TRIM33-mediated late downregulation of Ifnb1 expression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ICE functions as a cis-acting transcriptional repressor element of Ifnb1 gene activation in macrophages, and TRIM33 and PU.1 bound to ICE may have an important role in Ifnb1 gene transcription shutdown during late phase of macrophage activation.

    “Altogether, these results show that ICE functions as a cis-acting transcriptional repressor element of the Ifnb1 gene activation in macrophages and indicate that TRIM33 and PU.1 bound to ICE may have an important role in Ifnb1 gene transcription shutdown during the late phase of macrophage activation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The Smad-interaction and ubiquitin ligase domains are not necessary for TRIM33 regulation of Ifnb1 expression, suggesting TRIM33 is part of a regulatory complex that regulates Ifnb1 transcription.

    “These results indicate that the Smad-interaction and ubiquitin ligase domains are not necessary for TRIM33 regulation of Ifnb1 expression and suggest that TRIM33 is part of a regulatory complex that regulates Ifnb1 transcription.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Firefly luciferase activity was normalized with respect to renilla luciferase activity.

    “Firefly luciferase activity was normalized with respect to renilla luciferase activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The opposite roles of ICE in fibroblasts and macrophages might be linked to recruitment of distinct proteins in the two cell types.

    “These opposite roles of ICE in fibroblasts and macrophages might be linked to recruitment of distinct proteins in the two cell types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The activity and/or substrate availability of TRIM33 regulates Ifnb1 expression at the end of LPS activation of macrophages.

    “Together with the continuous binding of TRIM33 on ICE, the complementation of the Ifnb1 phenotype in macrophages by re-expression of TRIM33 in Trim33−/− immortalized macrophages suggested a direct role of TRIM33 in Ifnb1 transcription and indicated that the activity and/or substrate availability of TRIM33 regulated Ifnb1 expression at the end of LPS activation of macrophages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All the clones were verified by sequencing of a 2 kb genomic region containing the ICE.

    “All the clones were verified by sequencing of a 2 kb genomic region containing the ICE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All the constructs were verified by sequencing.

    “All the constructs were verified by sequencing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In WT BMDM, Pol II drops off and Ifnb1 transcription ceases, whereas in Trim33−/− BMDM, continued Pol II occupancy and H3K4me3 promote sustained Ifnb1 transcription.

    “Then, in WT BMDM, Pol II drops off and Ifnb1 transcription ceases, whereas in Trim33−/− BMDM, continued Pol II occupancy and H3K4me3 promote sustained Ifnb1 transcription.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The ICE/Ifnb1 loop is cell-type independent, stable and independent of viral or bacterial stimulation.

    “These combined findings indicate that ICE/Ifnb1 loop is cell-type independent, stable and independent of viral or bacterial stimulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ICE has an open-chromatin structure highly conserved during myeloid differentiation and characterized by Pol II occupancy and H3K4 trimethylation, features not typical of an enhancer or repressor.

    “ICE has an open-chromatin structure highly conserved during myeloid differentiation and characterized by Pol II occupancy and tri-methylation of H3K4, two features that are not typical marks of an enhancer or a repressor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ICE interacts with the Ifnb1 proximal region in a constitutive and TRIM33-independent manner, but this interaction is strengthened following LPS stimulation.

    “These results indicate that ICE interacts with the Ifnb1 proximal region in a constitutive and TRIM33-independent manner, but that this interaction is strengthened following LPS stimulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Enhanced CBP/p300 recruitment and activity at late times of activation is required for sustained Ifnb1 expression in Trim33−/− BMDM, and TRIM33 may regulate Ifnb1 expression at late times by preventing the recruitment of CBP/p300.

    “Altogether, these results show that enhanced CBP/p300 recruitment and activity at late times of activation is required for sustained Ifnb1 expression in Trim33−/− BMDM and that TRIM33 may regulate Ifnb1 expression at late times by preventing the recruitment of CBP/p300.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All adherent cells expressed F4/80 and were considered as PMs.

    “All adherent cells expressed F4/80 and were considered as PMs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    gRNA were designed to minimize the number of off-target sites.

    “Two guides RNA (gRNA) were designed to delete a 1,361 bp fragment containing the −15 kb region using the CRISPR Design Tool (http://tools.genome-engineering.org), to minimize the number of off-target sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Single clones were isolated that expressed F4/80, CD11b but not Gr1.

    “Single clones were isolated that expressed F4/80, CD11b but not Gr1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Experiments were performed in compliance with European legislation and with the Ethics Committee of the French Ministry of Agriculture.

    “Experiments were performed in compliance with European legislation and with the Ethics Committee of the French Ministry of Agriculture (Agreement B9203202).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Ifnb1 mRNA levels measured reflect Ifnb1 gene transcription.

    “The effects of Trim33 deletion on Ifnb1 expression in macrophages were studied by comparing kinetics of Ifnb1 mRNA levels in wild-type (WT) or Trim33−/− BMDM and PM, upon TLR4 activation by LPS or upon TLR3 activation by poly(I:C).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ChIP and ChIP-seq signals for TRIM33, PU.1, Pol II, histone modifications and CBP/p300 are specific to their intended targets.

    “TRIM33 ChIP-seq data obtained from the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line or from BMDM treated with LPS for 24 h showed a single TRIM33 peak at the Ifnb1 locus that overlapped with a PU.1 peak located 15 kb upstream from the Ifnb1 TSS”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of ICE does not affect other regulatory elements or gene function beyond the intended deletion.

    “Using this system, we had to screen 200 RAW 264.7 clones to get one RAW 264.7 clone with monoallelic deletion of ICE (Supplementary Fig. 2d).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LyzCre-mediated deletion of Trim33 in macrophages does not cause developmental or compensatory changes that confound the Ifnb1 phenotype.

    “Trim33−/− mice did not display developmental abnormalities and were healthy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 3C-seq signals reflect physical chromatin loops between ICE and Ifnb1.

    “To investigate how TRIM33 bound to ICE, that is located 15 kb upstream of the Ifnb1 transcription unit, may regulate Ifnb1 transcription, chromosome conformation capture experiments followed by deep sequencing (3C-seq) were performed in WT and Trim33−/− BMDM before and after LPS activation.”
5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferri, F., Parcelier, A., Petit, V., Gallouet, A.-S., Lewandowski, D., Dalloz, M., van den Heuvel, A., Kolovos, P., Soler, E., Squadrito, M. L., De Palma, M., Davidson, I., Rousselet, G., & Romeo, P.-H.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Davidson, Irwin
  • Rousselet, Germain
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
8900-8900
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114017212
Cited by
71
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
TRIM33, IFNB1, interferon-beta, macrophage activation, transcriptional repression, PU.1, enhanceosome, CBP/p300
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Macrophage Activation, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review