Protein Acetylation Regulates Both PU.1 Transactivation and Igκ 3′ Enhancer Activity
Open accessAbstract
Igκ gene expression and chromatin structure change during B cell development. At the pre-B cell stage, the locus is relatively hypoacetylated on histone H3, whereas it is hyperacetylated at the plasma cell stage. We find in this study that the histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA) stimulated 3′ enhancer activity through the PU.1 binding site. TSA also stimulated PU.1 transactivation potential. PU.1 activity was increased by the coactivator acetyltransferase protein, p300, and p300 physically interacted with PU.1 residues 7–30. PU.1 served as a substrate for p300 and was acetylated on lysine residues 170, 171, 206, and 208. Mutation of PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 did not affect PU.1 DNA binding, but did lower the ability of PU.1 to activate transcription in association with p300. Lysine 170 was acetylated in pre-B cells and plasmacytoma cells, but TSA treatment did not stimulate PU.1 acetylation at this residue arguing that a second mechanism can stimulate 3′ enhancer activity. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays we found that TSA caused preferential acetylation of histone H3 at the 3′ enhancer. The relevance of these studies for PU.1 function in transcription and hemopoietic development is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ TSA induces 3Ј enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation
TSA treatment raises PU.1 transcriptional activity in NIH-3T3 cells expressing PU.1.
“TSA treatment resulted in a very dramatic increase in PU.1 transcriptional activity (10-to 20-fold; Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
- Findingown data§ PU.1 is acetylated in vivo
PU.1 is acetylated on lysine 170 at both pre-B and plasma cell stages.
“PU.1 was acetylated on lysine 170 at both developmental stages (Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 transactivation domain can physically interact with p300
PU.1 and p300 interact in vivo.
“Therefore, PU.1 and p300 can interact in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 transactivation domain can physically interact with p300
PU.1 residues 7-30 are required for physical interaction with p300.
“Deletion of PU.1 residues 7-30 greatly reduced PU.1-p300 interaction, whereas deletion of PU.1 residues 33-100 had no effect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
p300 acetylates PU.1 in vitro.
“p300 also acetylated GST-PU.1 nearly as efficiently as p53”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
PU.1 lysine 170 is the major p300 acetylation target site.
“Individual mutation of each lysine residue indicated that lysine 170 is the major target of p300 acetylation, residue 171 is a minor target site, and lysine 169 appears not to be acetylated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
- Findingown data§ Introduction
TSA treatment does not increase PU.1 lysine 170 acetylation.
“However, TSA treatment did not increase PU.1 lysine 170 acetylation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 transactivation domain can physically interact with p300
p300 is recruited to the Igκ 3' enhancer in vivo.
“ChIP experiments with anti-p300 Abs showed that p300 was indeed recruited to the 3Ј enhancer in vivo (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
PU.1 lysine 171 is a minor p300 acetylation target site.
“Individual mutation of each lysine residue indicated that lysine 170 is the major target of p300 acetylation, residue 171 is a minor target site, and lysine 169 appears not to be acetylated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
- Findingown data§ Introduction
TSA causes preferential acetylation of histone H3 at the Igκ 3' enhancer.
“Using chromatin immunoprecipitation methods we found that TSA causes preferential acetylation of histone H3 at the 3Ј enhancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
- Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation
Acetylation does not detectably alter PU.1 DNA binding.
“We tested the DNA-binding ability of acetylated and unacetylated PU.1 by EMSA and found no discernable difference (although the fraction of acetylated PU.1 molecules was uncertain; data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
P/CAF does not acetylate PU.1 in vitro.
“P/CAF efficiently acetylated p53, but failed to recognize PU.1 as a substrate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 is acetylated in vivo
PU.1 is acetylated in vivo.
“The anti-PU.1 Ab precipitated a labeled protein with the electrophoretic mobility expected for PU.1 (ϳ43 kDa; Fig. 5A), indicating that PU.1 can be acetylated in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ PU.1 transactivation domain can physically interact with p300
GST-PU.1 binds p300 in vitro.
“We found that GST-PU.1 interaction with p300 was readily detectable, whereas p300 showed little affinity for GST alone (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation
PU.1 mutant K170,171R is compromised in its ability to be stimulated by p300.
“the K170,171R mutant was compromised in its ability to be stimulated by p300 (Fig. 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Proteins with HAT activity can induce PU.1-dependent transcription
Among the HAT coactivators tested, p300 gives the strongest stimulation of PU.1 transactivation.
“PU.1 activity was stimulated by most coactivator proteins, but transactivation was stimulated the most by p300 (3-fold; Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ TSA induces 3Ј enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation
TSA treatment increases Igκ 3' enhancer activity in the pre-B cell line 3-1.
“TSA treatment caused a dramatic 7-fold increase in enhancer activity (Fig. 1A, lanes 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
- Findingown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
PU.1 lysine 169 is not acetylated by p300.
“Individual mutation of each lysine residue indicated that lysine 170 is the major target of p300 acetylation, residue 171 is a minor target site, and lysine 169 appears not to be acetylated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
- Findingown data§ Discussion
Efficient p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcriptional activity requires two distinct PU.1 segments.
“Our studies showed that efficient p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcriptional activity required two distinct PU.1 segments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Stable expression of PU.1 in NIH-3T3 cells did not result in appreciable PU.1 binding at the endogenous Ig locus.
“Similarly, we found that stable expression of PU.1 in NIH-3T3 cells did not result in appreciable PU.1 binding at the endogenous Ig locus, suggesting that PU.1 does not gain access to the locus in fibroblasts (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
TSA treatment causes a nonuniform induction of histone H3 acetylation.
“In contrast, TSA treatment caused a nonuniform induction of histone H3 acetylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcription does not require Pip.
“However, lysines 170 and 171 do not appear to influence the binding of Pip to its adjacent DNA binding site (Fig. 6A), and p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcription does not require Pip.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
TSA increases histone H4 acetylation by 2- to 3-fold at all locations across the Ig locus.
“We found histone H4 acetylation was increased between 2-and 3-fold by TSA at all locations across the locus (Fig. 7, lanes 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
PU.1 residues 7-30 are needed for p300 stimulation.
“First, PU.1 residues 7-30 were needed for p300 stimulation, and p300 physically interacted with PU.1 via these residues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
p300 can increase the transactivation potential of PU.1.
“In contrast, our results show that PU.1 can cooperate with p300 to activate transcription, and that p300 can increase the transactivation potential of PU.1.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“PU.1 activity was increased by the coactivator acetyltransferase protein, p300, and p300 physically interacted with PU.1 residues 7-30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
- Findingown data§ Discussion
PU.1 can cooperate with p300 to activate transcription.
“In contrast, our results show that PU.1 can cooperate with p300 to activate transcription, and that p300 can increase the transactivation potential of PU.1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
TSA causes a 15- to 20-fold induction of H3 acetylation at the 3' enhancer.
“Most impressively, TSA caused a 15to 20-fold induction of H3 acetylation at the 3Ј enhancer (lanes 9 and 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation
TSA treatment does not cause a substantial increase in acetylation of PU.1 at lysine 170.
“TSA treatment did not result in a substantial increase in PU.1 lysine 170 acetylation (Fig. 6C).”
- Also stated in: § Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation · plain
“However, we did not find evidence that TSA treatment caused elevated PU.1 acetylation on lysine 170.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“Lysine 170 was acetylated in pre-B cells and plasmacytoma cells, but TSA treatment did not stimulate PU.1 acetylation at this residue arguing that a second mechanism can stimulate 3 enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation · plain
- Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation
Treatment with TSA increases the transactivation activity of PU.1.
“TSA causes increased PU.1 transactivation (Fig. 1B) and increased 3Ј enhancer activity (Fig. 1A).”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“TSA also stimulated PU.1 transactivation potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
- Findingown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
TSA preferentially activates H3 acetylation at the 3' enhancer compared with other locations within the Ig locus.
“Thus, TSA preferentially activates H3 acetylation at the 3Ј enhancer compared with other locations within the locus, suggesting that this acetylation contributes to increased enhancer activity.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“TSA preferentially induces H3 acetylation at the 3Ј enhancer.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays we found that TSA caused preferential acetylation of histone H3 at the 3 enhancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
- Findingown data§ Discussion
Lysines 170 and 171 do not appear to influence the binding of Pip to its adjacent DNA binding site.
“However, lysines 170 and 171 do not appear to influence the binding of Pip to its adjacent DNA binding site (Fig. 6A), and p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcription does not require Pip.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Elevated acetylation of histone H3 at the 3' enhancer in response to TSA correlates with increased 3' enhancer activity.
“Second, elevated acetylation of histone H3 at the 3Ј enhancer in response to TSA treatment correlated with increased 3Ј enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
p300 physically interacts with PU.1 via residues 7-30.
“First, PU.1 residues 7-30 were needed for p300 stimulation, and p300 physically interacted with PU.1 via these residues.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“PU.1 activity was increased by the coactivator acetyltransferase protein, p300, and p300 physically interacted with PU.1 residues 7-30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
- Findingnone given§ Discussion
The second PU.1 segment needed for maximal activity with p300 is lysine residues 170 and 171.
“The second PU.1 segment needed for maximal activity with p300 was lysine residues 170 and 171.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ FIGURE 7.
TSA stimulates 3' enhancer activity through the PU.1 binding site.
“We find in this study that the histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA) stimulated 3 enhancer activity through the PU.1 binding site.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
PU.1 serves as a substrate for acetylation by p300.
“PU.1 also served as a substrate for p300dependent acetylation, and this acetylation was necessary for maximal PU.1 transactivation in association with p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation
Treatment with TSA increases the activity of the Ig 3' enhancer.
“TSA causes increased PU.1 transactivation (Fig. 1B) and increased 3Ј enhancer activity (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Acetylation of PU.1 is necessary for maximal PU.1 transactivation in association with p300.
“PU.1 also served as a substrate for p300dependent acetylation, and this acetylation was necessary for maximal PU.1 transactivation in association with p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
Acetylation of histone H3 correlates with increased enhancer activity.
“Second, acetylation of histone H3 correlates with increased enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Transfection of PU.1 and p300 did not convincingly increase H3 acetylation at the endogenous Ig 3' enhancer.
“However, we did not observe a convincing increase in H3 acetylation in response to PU.1 and p300 transfection (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Introduction
TSA treatment increases 3' enhancer activity largely through the PU.1/Pip composite element.
“We find in this study that trichostatin A (TSA) treatment increased 3Ј enhancer activity, and this increase was largely through the PU.1/Pip composite element.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
- Findingown data§ FIGURE 7.
Lysine 170 of PU.1 is acetylated in pre-B cells and plasmacytoma cells.
“Lysine 170 was acetylated in pre-B cells and plasmacytoma cells, but TSA treatment did not stimulate PU.1 acetylation at this residue arguing that a second mechanism can stimulate 3 enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ FIGURE 7.
Mutation of PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 lowers the ability of PU.1 to activate transcription in association with p300.
“Mutation of PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 did not affect PU.1 DNA binding, but did lower the ability of PU.1 to activate transcription in association with p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ FIGURE 7.
PU.1 is acetylated on lysine residues 170, 171, 206, and 208.
“PU.1 served as a substrate for p300 and was acetylated on lysine residues 170, 171, 206, and 208.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ FIGURE 7.
Mutation of PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 does not affect PU.1 DNA binding.
“Mutation of PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 did not affect PU.1 DNA binding, but did lower the ability of PU.1 to activate transcription in association with p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TSA induces 3Ј enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation
A mechanism other than altered DNA binding accounts for TSA's increase of PU.1 transactivation.
“a distinct mechanism is responsible for increased PU.1 transactivation by TSA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
- Interpretationown data§ Introduction
The results provide evidence of two mechanisms for controlling 3' enhancer activity.
“Our results provide evidence of two mechanisms for controlling 3Ј enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
- Premisecitation§ TSA induces 3Ј enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation
PU.1 binding to DNA is unchanged by TSA treatment.
“Because DNA binding by PU.1 is not affected by TSA treatment (36)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylation
PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 are necessary for maximal p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcriptional activity.
“Therefore, lysine residues 170 and 171, which serve as target sites of p300 acetylation, are also necessary for maximal p300 stimulation of PU.1 transcriptional activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: p300 is the acetyltransferase responsible for PU.1 acetylation in vivo.
- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
- Interpretationown data§ Introduction
PU.1 acetylation may be important for PU.1 transactivation with p300.
“We found that PU.1 is acetylated in vivo, and this acetylation may be important for PU.1 transactivation with p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: p300 is the acetyltransferase responsible for PU.1 acetylation in vivo.
- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
- Interpretationown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
The major p300 acetylation sites in PU.1 lie between residues 75 and 222.
“Therefore, the major sites of PU.1 acetylation lie between residues 75 and 222.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ PU.1 is acetylated in vivo
The anti-acetyl K170 antiserum is specific for acetylated PU.1.
“The specificity of the Ab for acetylated PU.1 was shown by observing greater reactivity against p300 acetylated PU.1 than with unacetylated PU.1 protein (Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation
PU.1 lysines 206 and 208 are weak p300 acetylation sites.
“Therefore, lysines 206 and 208 are weak p300 acetylation sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
- Interpretationown data§ Proteins with HAT activity can induce PU.1-dependent transcription
PU.1 residues 7-30 are required for p300 to induce PU.1 transactivation.
“Therefore, p300 induction of PU.1 transactivation requires PU.1 residues 7-30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion
p300 stimulation must target some function other than PU.1 recruitment of Pip DNA binding.
“Thus, p300 stimulation must target some function other than PU.1 recruitment of Pip DNA binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
Acetylation can cause increased transactivation by PU.1.
“First, acetylation can cause increased transactivation by PU.1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion
The PU.1 7-30 region is the target of Pax5-mediated repression of PU.1 transcriptional function.
“We previously showed that the PU.1 7-30 region is also the target of Pax5 (B cell-specific activator protein)mediated repression of PU.1 transcriptional function (53).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion
The PU.1 and H3 acetylation mechanisms for increasing enhancer activity may be distinct.
“Our data suggest that the PU.1 and H3 acetylation mechanisms for increasing enhancer activity may be distinct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
Protein acetylation can influence Ig 3' enhancer activity through two distinct mechanisms.
“Thus, protein acetylation can influence Ig 3Ј enhancer activity by two distinct mechanisms.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“Our results indicate that protein acetylation can influence Ig 3Ј enhancer activity by two distinct mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Interpretationown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
Acetylation of histone H3 at the 3' enhancer contributes to increased enhancer activity.
“Thus, TSA preferentially activates H3 acetylation at the 3Ј enhancer compared with other locations within the locus, suggesting that this acetylation contributes to increased enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion
PU.1 does not gain access to the Ig locus in fibroblasts.
“Similarly, we found that stable expression of PU.1 in NIH-3T3 cells did not result in appreciable PU.1 binding at the endogenous Ig locus, suggesting that PU.1 does not gain access to the locus in fibroblasts (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancer
TSA can induce acetylation of histone H3 at the Ig 3' enhancer.
“We previously showed that TSA can induce histone H3 acetylation at the 3Ј enhancer (36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion
The correlation suggests a chromatin structure mechanism for increased enhancer activity.
“This suggests a chromatin structure mechanism for increased enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion
PU.1 DNA binding in vivo is not appreciably changed by TSA treatment.
“Because PU.1 DNA binding in vivo is not appreciably changed by TSA treatment (36), PU.1 may respond to TSA treatment by differentially recruiting coactivators or corepressors to the enhancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Discussion
Cotransfection of p300 reverses Pax5-mediated repression of PU.1 transactivation.
“Cotransfection of p300 reversed the Pax5-mediated repression of PU.1 transactivation (53).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Discussion
According to the crystal structure of the PU.1 Ets domain on DNA, lysine residues 170 and 171 lie very near DNA just downstream of the PU.1 binding site.
“According to the crystal structure of the PU.1 Ets domain on DNA (54), lysine residues 170 and 171 should lie very near DNA just downstream of the PU.1 binding site.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion
p300 and CBP interact with PU.1 by distinct mechanisms.
“Therefore, p300 and CBP appear to interact with PU.1 by distinct mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion
PU.1 does not increase nuclease accessibility at the Ig locus in non-B lineage cells.
“This is consistent with other work showing that PU.1 does not increase nuclease accessibility at the Ig locus in non-B lineage cells (51).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Discussion
PU.1 residues 7-30 comprise a portion of the PU.1 transactivation domain defined in transient expression assays.
“This segment comprises a portion of the PU.1 transactivation domain defined in transient expression assays (50).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data§ Generation of PU.1 acetyl lysine 170-specific antiserum
The specificity of the acetyl K170 antiserum was tested by Western blot with acetylated and unacetylated PU.1.
“The specificity of the serum for acetylated PU.1 was tested by Western blot analysis with acetylated and unacetylated PU.1 (see Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion
The above-mentioned lysines are in a position conducive to protein interactions with adjacently bound proteins.
“This would place the above-mentioned lysines in a position conducive to protein interactions with adjacently bound proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion
PU.1 can recruit the corepressor protein Grg4 to the IgH HS1,2 enhancer in conjunction with Pax-5.
“Consistent with this idea, PU.1 can recruit the corepressor protein, Grg4, to the IgH HS1,2 enhancer in conjunction with Pax-5 (52).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Discussion
Lysines 206 and 208 lie near the sugar phosphate backbone.
“Similarly, lysines 206 and 208 lie near the sugar phosphate backbone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion
Acetylation of PU.1 at lysine 170 is not responsible for the increased PU.1 transactivation in response to TSA.
“However, because PU.1 acetylation on lysine 170 was unchanged in response to TSA, acetylation of this residue is not responsible for the increased PU.1 transactivation in response to TSA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 13
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylationPU.1 mutant K206,208R binds DNA poorly and is inefficient at recruiting Pip.
“In contrast, mutant K206,208R bound to DNA poorly and was inefficient at recruiting Pip to DNA (lanes 5 and 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ IntroductionPU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylation with acetylation sites at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208.
“We find that PU.1 physically interacts with p300 and is a substrate for p300 acetylation with acetylation sites at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: p300 is the acetyltransferase responsible for PU.1 acetylation in vivo.
- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylationPU.1 mutant K170,171R binds DNA and recruits Pip as efficiently as wild-type PU.1.
“Mutant K170,171R bound to DNA and recruited Pip as efficiently as wildtype PU.1 (Fig. 6A, lanes 1-4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DiscussionThe transactivation function of PU.1 is increased by either TSA treatment or cotransfection with p300.
“First, the PU.1 transactivation function was increased by either inhibition of histone deacetylases via TSA treatment or cotransfection with acetyltransferase protein p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ TSA induces H3 acetylation preferentially at the 3Ј enhancerTSA increases H3 acetylation by about 6-fold at the intron enhancer and by about 3-fold at the constant region.
“H3 acetylation increased ϳ6-fold at the intron enhancer and ϳ3-fold at the constant region (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ IntroductionPU.1 transactivation potential is increased in the presence of TSA or when cotransfected with p300.
“The PU.1 transactivation potential was also increased in the presence of TSA or when cotransfected with the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) protein, p300.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ PU.1 is a substrate for p300 acetylationPU.1 lysines 170, 206, and 208 are major p300 acetylation target sites, and lysine 171 is a minor site.
“The above results indicate that PU.1 lysine residues 170, 206, and 208 are major p300 acetylation target sites, and lysine 171 is a minor site.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: p300 is the acetyltransferase responsible for PU.1 acetylation in vivo.
- Rests on an assumption: The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown data§ TSA induces 3Ј enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivationMost of the TSA-driven rise in 3' enhancer activity depends on the PU.1/Pip composite element.
“However, the activity of the PU.1/Pip reporter was very dramatically increased by TSA treatment (10-fold; Fig. 1, lanes 5 and 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ IntroductionEither other PU.1 lysines are targeted or a second mechanism is needed for TSA induction of enhancer activity.
“arguing that either other PU.1 lysines are targeted, or a second mechanism is needed for TSA induction of enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ DiscussionPU.1 may respond to TSA treatment by differentially recruiting coactivators or corepressors to the enhancer.
“Because PU.1 DNA binding in vivo is not appreciably changed by TSA treatment (36), PU.1 may respond to TSA treatment by differentially recruiting coactivators or corepressors to the enhancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ FIGURE 7.Low PU.1 expression levels in progenitor cells generally give rise to B cell development, whereas higher levels yield macrophage development.
“Low PU.1 expression levels in progenitor cells generally give rise to B cell development, whereas higher levels yield macrophage development (23).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ DiscussionPax5 can repress Ig 3' enhancer function in cooperation with PU.1.
“We similarly previously showed that Pax5 can repress Ig 3Ј enhancer function in cooperation with PU.1 (53).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ DiscussionCompetition between Grg4 and p300 for interaction with PU.1 could constitute a molecular switch between repression and activation.
“Because Pax5 and PU.1 can recruit the corepressor Grg4 to DNA (52), competition between Grg4 and p300 for interaction with PU.1 could constitute a molecular switch between repression and activation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionPU.1 can inhibit CBP HAT activity in vivo, leading to changes in global acetylation patterns.
“Interestingly, PU.1 can inhibit CBP HAT activity in vivo, leading to changes in global acetylation patterns (33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ FIGURE 7.Changing PU.1 activity by expression level or by function via protein interactions or post-translational modifications could have a dramatic impact on biological processes.
“Thus, changing PU.1 activity by either expression level or, perhaps, its function via protein interactions or post-translational modifications could have a very dramatic impact on biological processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown data§ Functional consequences of PU.1 acetylationTSA induction of 3' enhancer activity involves a second acetylation mechanism.
“However, our results are also con-sistent with the possibility that TSA induction of 3Ј enhancer activity involves a second acetylation mechanism.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
“Lysine 170 was acetylated in pre-B cells and plasmacytoma cells, but TSA treatment did not stimulate PU.1 acetylation at this residue arguing that a second mechanism can stimulate 3 enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § FIGURE 7. · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionCBP requires PU.1 sequences 74-122 for physical interaction.
“Interaction with PU.1 residues 7-30 was somewhat surprising because the p300-related protein CBP requires PU.1 sequences 74 -122 for physical interaction (32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionPax5 and PU.1 can recruit the corepressor Grg4 to DNA.
“Because Pax5 and PU.1 can recruit the corepressor Grg4 to DNA (52), competition between Grg4 and p300 for interaction with PU.1 could constitute a molecular switch between repression and activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ In vitro acetylation assaysGels were stained with Coomassie Blue to verify protein quantity.
“Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue to verify protein quantity, then subjected to autoradiography to evaluate acetylation activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussionp300 is likely first recruited via PU.1 residues 7-30 and then acetylates PU.1 on lysine residues 170, 171, 206, and 208.
“It is likely that p300 is first recruited via PU.1 residues 7-30, and then p300 subsequently acetylates PU.1 on lysine residues 170, 171, 206, and 208.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DiscussionAcetylation of PU.1 can increase PU.1 transactivation and consequently enhancer activity.
“Thus, acetylation of PU.1 can increase PU.1 transactivation and, as a result, enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ Cell culture and transfectionsTransfections were performed three to five times.
“In each case, transfections were performed three to five times.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ Cell culture and transfectionsTransfection efficiencies were normalized using β-galactosidase activity.
“Transfection efficiencies were normalized using -galactosidase activity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ FIGURE 7.Reducing PU.1 expression levels in vivo to 20% of wild-type levels leads to a high incidence of acute myeloid leukemia.
“In addition, reducing PU.1 expression levels in vivo to 20% of wild-type levels leads to a high incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] 2004
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
TSA specifically inhibits histone deacetylases, and its effects on enhancer activity and PU.1 transactivation are due to this inhibition.
“TSA treatment was performed for 24 h at a concentration of 33 nM.”
“an agent that inhibits histone deacetylase activity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
p300 is the acetyltransferase responsible for PU.1 acetylation in vivo.
“PU.1 physically interacts with p300 and is a substrate for p300 acetylation”
“PU.1 is acetylated in vivo”
The paper relies on this without support.
The acetylation of PU.1 at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208 in vitro reflects the functionally relevant acetylation in vivo.
“We find that PU.1 physically interacts with p300 and is a substrate for p300 acetylation with acetylation sites at lysines 170, 171, 206, and 208.”
“PU.1 was acetylated on lysine 170 at both developmental stages (Fig. 5B).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
p300 binding at the Il9 promoter is higher in PU.1-deficient Th9 cells.
“In contrast to previous reports showing that PU.1 recruited p300 to the Igκ locus in B cells (23), there was increased binding of p300 at the Il9 promoter in PU.1-deficient Th9 cells (Fig. 3A).”
From Gcn5 Is Required for PU.1-Dependent IL-9 Induction in Th9 Cells (2012) · cites this paper as [23]
PU.1 can interact with CBP/p300 and TRIM33.
“as PU.1 can interact with CBP/p300 (refs 39, 40) and TRIM33”
From TRIM33 switches off Ifnb1 gene transcription during the late phase of macrophage activation (2015) · cites this paper as [40]
Direct interactions between CBP and p300 have been reported for SPI1 and ETV1.
“In addition, direct interactions between CBP and p300 have been reported for SPI1 (117–118) and ETV1 (119, 120).”
From Genomic and biochemical insights into the specificity of ETS transcription factors (2011) · cites this paper as [117]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
TSA treatment duration differs between methods and Figure 1
MajorThe methods specify 24 hours of TSA treatment, while the Figure 1 caption says the treated transfections received TSA for 18 hours.
“TSA treatment was performed for 24 h at a concentration of 33 nM.”
“One-half of each transfection received 33 nM TSA for 18 h.”
Figure 6C sample type differs between results and caption
MinorThe results describe Western blots of whole-cell lysates for the Figure 6C experiment, but the caption says the samples were nuclear extracts.
“3-1 pre-B and S194 plasmacytoma cells were left untreated or were treated with TSA, and whole cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analyses with anti-PU.1 and anti-acetyl lysine 170 PU.1 antisera.”
“C, TSA does not increase PU.1 acetylation on lysine 170.3-1, and S194 nuclear extracts were prepared from untreated and TSA-treated cells.”
Lysines 206 and 208 are classified as both weak and major sites
MinorThe same results section calls lysines 206 and 208 weak p300 acetylation sites, then includes them among the major target sites.
“Therefore, lysines 206 and 208 are weak p300 acetylation sites.”
“The above results indicate that PU.1 lysine residues 170, 206, and 208 are major p300 acetylation target sites, and lysine 171 is a minor site.”
Cites
Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., & Roeder, R. G. (1983) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/11.5.1475 · Cited by 11,262 · see citing works
A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA
Graham, F. L., & van der Eb, A. J. (1973) · Virology · doi:10.1016/0042-6822(73)90341-3 · Cited by 9,734 · see citing works
Recombinant Genomes Which Express Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase in Mammalian Cells
Gorman, C., Moffat, L. F., & Howard, B. H. (1982) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.2.9.1044 · Cited by 7,673 · see citing works
Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction
Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., & Pease, L. R. (1989) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2 · Cited by 7,354 · see citing works
Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages
Scott, E. W., Simon, M. C., Anastasi, J., & Singh, H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8079170 · Cited by 1,532 · see citing works
Hardy, R. R., & Hayakawa, K. (2001) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.595 · Cited by 1,236 · see citing works
Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities
McKercher, S. R., Torbett, B. E., Anderson, K. L., Henkel, G. W., Vestal, D. J., Baribault, H., Klemsz, M., Feeney, A. J., Wu, G. E., Paige, C. J., et al. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00949.x · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
Regulation of B lymphocyte and macrophage development by graded expression of PU.1
DeKoter, R. P., & Singh, H. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5470.1439 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Kaelin, W. G., Pallas, D. C., DeCaprio, J. A., Kaye, F. J., & Livingston, D. M. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90236-r · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1.
Rosenbauer, F., Wagner, K., Kutok, J. L., Iwasaki, H., Le Beau, M. M., Okuno, Y., Akashi, K., Fiering, S., & Tenen, D. G. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1361 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1
Zhang, P., Behre, G., Pan, J., Iwama, A., Wara-aswapati, N., Radomska, H. S., Auron, P. E., Tenen, D. G., & Sun, Z. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.15.8705 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Rekhtman, N., Radparvar, F., Evans, T., & Skoultchi, A. I. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.11.1398 · Cited by 454 · cited 2× · see citing works
“1 is down-regulated during erythrogenesis (26, 29, 30).”
BackgroundPU.1 induces myeloid lineage commitment in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors
Nerlov, C., & Graf, T. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.15.2403 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Pip, a novel IRF family member, is a lymphoid-specific, PU.1-dependent transcriptional activator.
Eisenbeis, C. F., Singh, H., & Storb, U. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.11.1377 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Betz, A. G., Milstein, C., González‐Fernández, Á., Pannell, R., Larson, T., & Neuberger, M. S. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90316-6 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Pongubala, J. M., Nagulapalli, S., Klemsz, M. J., McKercher, S. R., Maki, R. A., & Atchison, M. L. (1992) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.12.1.368 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Self-citationA new pattern for helix–turn–helix recognition revealed by the PU.l ETS–domain–DNA complex
Kodandapani, R., Pio, F., Ni, C.-Z., Piccialli, G., Klemsz, M., McKercher, S., Maki, R. A., & Ely, K. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380456a0 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
DeKoter, R. P., Walsh, J. C., & Singh, H. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.15.4456 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Effect of PU.1 phosphorylation on interaction with NF-EM5 and transcriptional activation
Pongubala, J., Van Beveren, C., Nagulapalli, S., Klemsz, M., McKercher, Maki, R., & Atchison, M. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8456286 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationScott, E. W., Fisher, R. C., Olson, M. C., Kehrli, E. W., Simon, M. C., & Singh, H. (1997) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80287-3 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Olson, M. C., Scott, E. W., Hack, A. A., Su, G. H., Tenen, D. G., Singh, H., & Simon, M. C. (1995) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/1074-7613(95)90060-8 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Eisenbeis, C. F., Singh, H., & Storb, U. (1993) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.13.10.6452 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Gene segment selection in V(D)J recombination: accessibility and beyond
Krangel, M. S. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni0703-624 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Davidson, L., Alt, F. W., & Baltimore, D. (1996) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80251-4 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Takeda, S., Zou, Y.-R., Bluethmann, H., Kitamura, D., Müller, U., & Rajewsky, K. (1993) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05887.x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
The Igκ 3′ Enhancer Influences the Ratio of Igκ versus Igλ B Lymphocytes
Gorman, J. R., van der Stoep, N., Monroe, R., Cogné, M., Davidson, L., & Alt, F. W. (1996) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80319-2 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Rose, S. M., & Garrard, W. T. (1984) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)39763-6 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
The transcription factor PU.1 is involved in macrophage proliferation.
Celada, A., Borràs, F. E., Soler, C., Lloberas, J., Klemsz, M., van Beveren, C., McKercher, S., & Maki, R. A. (1996) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.184.1.61 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Inhibition of hematopoiesis by competitive binding of transcription factor PU.1
Voso, M. T., Burn, T. C., Wulf, G., Lim, B., Leone, G., & Tenen, D. G. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.17.7932 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Parslow, T. G., & Granner, D. K. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299449a0 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Pongubala, J. M. R., & Atchison, M. L. (1991) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.11.2.1040 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationInlay, M. A., Alt, F. W., Baltimore, D., & Xu, Y. (2002) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni790 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Physical and functional interactions between the transcription factor PU.1 and the coactivator CBP
Yamamoto, H., Kihara-Negishi, F., Yamada, T., Hashimoto, Y., & Oikawa, T. (1999) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1202427 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
PU.1 Recruits a Second Nuclear Factor to a Site Important for Immunoglobulin κ 3' Enhancer Activity
Pongubala, J. M. R., Nagulapalli, S., Klemsz, M. J., McKercher, S. R., Maki, R. A., & Atchison, M. L. (1992) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.12.1.368-378.1992 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationStorb, U., & Arp, B. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.21.6642 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Mather, E. L., & Perry, R. P. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.15.4689 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Activation of Transcription by PU.1 Requires both Acidic and Glutamine Domains
Klemsz, M. J., & Maki, R. A. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.1.390 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Role of the PU.1 Transcription Factor in Controlling Differentiation of Friend Erythroleukemia Cells
Schuetze, S. M., Paul, R. W., Gliniak, B., & Kabat, D. (1992) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.12.7.2967 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Shaffer, A. L., Peng, A., & Schlissel, M. S. (1997) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80420-3 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Klug, C. A., Gerety, S. J., Shah, P. C., Chen, Y. Y., Rice, N. R., Rosenberg, N. E., & Singh, H. (1994) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.8.6.678 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A Two-Step Mechanism for Recruitment of Pip by PU.1
Perkel, J. M., & Atchison, M. L. (1998) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.160.1.241 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationBSAP Can Repress Enhancer Activity by Targeting PU.1 Function
Maitra, S., & Atchison, M. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.6.1911-1922.2000 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationInhibition of CBP-Mediated Protein Acetylation by the Ets Family Oncoprotein PU.1
Hong, W., Kim, A. Y., Ky, S., Rakowski, C., Seo, S.-B., Chakravarti, D., Atchison, M., & Blobel, G. A. (2002) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.22.11.3729-3743.2002 · Cited by 71 · cited 2× · see citing works
“1 expression can lead to changes in global histone acetylation levels in vivo (32, 33).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNagulapalli, S., & Atchison, M. L. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.8.4639 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationLinderson, Y., Eberhard, D., Malin, S., Johansson, A., Busslinger, M., & Pettersson, S. (2004) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400089 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
A Developmentally Modulated Chromatin Structure at the Mouse Immunoglobulin κ 3′ Enhancer
Roque, M. C., Smith, P. A., & Blasquez, V. C. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.6.3138 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Hiramatsu, R., Akagi, K., Matsuoka, M., Sakumi, K., Nakamura, H., Kingsbury, L., David, C. S., Hardy, R. R., Yamamura, K., & Sakano, H. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90138-8 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Transcription termination and chromatin structure of the active immunoglobulin kappa gene locus.
Xu, M., Barnard, M., Rose, S. M., et al. (1986) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)35723-x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Commitment to the Monocytic Lineage Occurs in the Absence of the Transcription Factor PU.1
Henkel, G. W., McKercher, S. R., Leenen, P. J. M., & Maki, R. A. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v93.9.2849 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
ETS Protein–Dependent Accessibility Changes at the Immunoglobulin μ Heavy Chain Enhancer
Nikolajczyk, B. S., Sanchez, J. A., & Sen, R. (1999) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80077-1 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Pongubala, J. M. R., & Atchison, M. L. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.17.10304 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationPax-5 Is Essential for κ Sterile Transcription during Igκ Chain Gene Rearrangement
Sato, H., Saito-Ohara, F., Inazawa, J., et al. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4858 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The Igκ3′ Enhancer Is Activated by Gradients of Chromatin Accessibility and Protein Association
McDevit, D. C., Perkins, L., Atchison, M. L., & Nikolajczyk, B. S. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2834 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationPU.1 as a chromatin accessibility factor for immunoglobulin genes
Marecki, S., McCarthy, K. M., & Nikolajczyk, B. S. (2004) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2003.08.007 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Chiang, M. Y., & Monroe, J. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v94.11.3621 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Chiang, M. Y., & Monroe, J. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v94.11.3621.423k38_3621_3632 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Liu, X., Prabhu, A., & Ness, B. V. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.6.3285 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Meyer, K. B., Teh, Y.-M., & Neuberger, M. S. (1996) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/8.10.1561 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Commitment to the Monocytic Lineage Occurs in the Absence of the Transcription Factor PU.1
Henkel, G. W., McKercher, S. R., Leenen, P. J. M., et al. (1999) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v93.9.2849.409a12_2849_2858 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 2001, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 595
- 2003, Nat. Immunol., 624
- 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 3285
- 1991, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1040
- 1994, Genes Dev., 678
- 1996, Int. Immunol., 1561
- 2002, Nat. Immunol., 463
- 1983, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 4689
- 1982, Nature, 449
- 1996, Mol. Cell. Biol., 3138
- 1984, J. Biol. Chem., 8534
- 1983, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 6642
- 1986, J. Biol. Chem., 3838
- 1997, Immunity, 131
- 1992, Mol. Cell. Biol., 368
- 1993, Science, 1622
- 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 6452
- 1995, Genes Dev., 1377
- 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 7932
- 1997, Immunity, 437
- 1995, Immunity, 703
- 1996, J. Exp. Med., 61
- 2000, Science, 1439
- 1998, EMBO J., 4456
- 1998, Genes Dev., 2403
- 1992, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2967
- 1994, Science, 1573
- 1996, EMBO J., 5647
- 1999, Genes Dev., 1398
- 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 8705
- 2004, Nat. Genet., 624
- 1999, Oncogene, 1495
- 2002, Mol. Cell. Biol., 3729
- 1999, Immunity, 11
- 2004, J. Immunol., 4858
- 2005, J. Immunol., 2834
- 1989, Gene, 51
- 1998, J. Immunol., 241
- 1983, Nucleic Acids Res., 1475
- 1973, Virology, 456
- 1982, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1044
- 1991, Cell, 521
- 1993, EMBO J., 2329
- 1996, Immunity, 241
- 1996, Immunity, 377
- 1995, Cell, 1113
- 1994, Cell, 239
- 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 10304
- 1998, Mol. Cell. Biol., 4639
- 1996, Mol. Cell. Biol., 390
- 2004, Mol. Immunol., 723
- 2004, EMBO Rep., 291
- 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1911
- 1996, Nature, 456
- 1999, Blood, 2849
- 1999, Blood, 3621
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genomic and biochemical insights into the specificity of ETS transcription factors
Hollenhorst, P. C., McIntosh, L. P., & Graves, B. J. (2011) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.79.081507.103945 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
PAX genes: Roles in development, pathophysiology, and cancer
Lang, D., Powell, S., Plummer, R. S., Young, K. P., & Ruggeri, B. (2006) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2006.06.024 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Bunting, K. L., Soong, T. D., Singh, R., Jiang, Y., Béguelin, W., Poloway, D. W., Swed, B. L., Hatzi, K., Reisacher, W., Teater, M., et al. (2016) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.012 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Haery, L., Thompson, R. C., & Gilmore, T. D. (2015) · Genes & Cancer · doi:10.18632/genesandcancer.65 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Gcn5 Is Required for PU.1-Dependent IL-9 Induction in Th9 Cells
Goswami, R., & Kaplan, M. H. (2012) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1201496 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Transcription factors drive B cell development
Hagman, J. R., & Lukin, K. (2006) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2006.01.007 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Asano, Y., Czuwara, J., & Trojanowska, M. E. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m703907200 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
A Unique SUMO-2-Interacting Motif within LANA Is Essential for KSHV Latency
Cai, Q., Cai, S., Zhu, C., Verma, S. C., Choi, J.-Y., & Robertson, E. S. (2013) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003750 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
TRIM33 switches off Ifnb1 gene transcription during the late phase of macrophage activation
Ferri, F., Parcelier, A., Petit, V., Gallouet, A.-S., Lewandowski, D., Dalloz, M., van den Heuvel, A., Kolovos, P., Soler, E., Squadrito, M. L., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9900 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 3C Stabilizes Gemin3 to Block p53-mediated Apoptosis
Cai, Q., Guo, Y., Xiao, B., Banerjee, S., Saha, A., Lu, J. L., Glisovic, T., & Robertson, E. S. (2011) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002418 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
RetractedSafeguard function of PU.1 shapes the inflammatory epigenome of neutrophils
Fischer, J., Walter, C., Tönges, A., Aleth, H., Jordão, M. J. C., Leddin, M., Gröning, V., Erdmann, T., Lenz, G., Roth, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0343-z · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Zhu, C., Guo, Y., Wei, F., Lu, J. L., Qin, J., Banerjee, S., Wang, J., Shang, H., Verma, S. C., et al. (2014) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00283-14 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Epigenetic control of hematopoiesis: the PU.1 chromatin connection
van Riel, B., & Rosenbauer, F. (2014) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/hsz-2014-0195 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Eukaryotic enhancers: common features, regulation, and participation in diseases
Erokhin, M., Vassetzky, Y. S., Georgiev, P. G., & Chetverina, D. (2015) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-015-1871-9 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Dietschy, T., Shevelev, I., Peña-Dı́az, J., Hühn, D., Kuenzle, S., Mak, R. K. H., Miah, M. F., Heß, D., Fey, M., Hottiger, M. O., et al. (2009) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.037747 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The Essential Transcriptional Function of BRD4 in Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPreprint
Roe, J., & Vakoc, C. R. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2016.81.031039 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
PU.1 Can Recruit BCL6 to DNA To Repress Gene Expression in Germinal Center B Cells
Wei, F., Zápražná, K., Wang, J., & Atchison, M. L. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00234-09 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationEBNA3C regulates p53 through induction of Aurora kinase B
Jha, H. C., Yang, K., El-Naccache, D. W., Sun, Z., & Robertson, E. S. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.3310 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Modeling the Hematopoietic Landscape
Brown, G., & Ceredig, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2019.00104 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Acetylation Increases EWS-FLI1 DNA Binding and Transcriptional Activity
Schlottmann, S., Erkizan, H. V., Barber-Rotenberg, J. S., Knights, C. D., Cheema, A. K., Üren, A., Avantaggiati, M. L., & Toretsky, J. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2012.00107 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lapko, N., Zawadka, M., Połosak, J., Worthen, G. S., Danet-Desnoyers, G. A., Puzianowska‐Kuźnicka, M., & Laudański, K. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00401 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Park, S. Y., Lee, S. W., Kim, H. Y., Lee, S. Y., Lee, W. S., Hong, K. W., & Kim, C. D. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.07.007 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Curtiss, B. M., VanCampen, J., Macaraeg, J., Kong, G., Taherinasab, A., Tsuchiya, M., Yashar, W. M., Tsang, Y. H., Horton, W. R., Coleman, D. J., et al. (2022) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01594-1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Scialdone, A., Khazaei, S., Hasni, M. S., Lennartsson, A., Gullberg, U., & Drott, K. (2019) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2019.10.004 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Inaba, K., Yashiro, T., Hiroki, I., Watanabe, R., Kasakura, K., & Nishiyama, C. (2020) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1901008 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Hodawadekar, S., Park, K., Farrar, M. A., & Atchison, M. L. (2012) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102239 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationPlant, E., Bellefroid, M., & Lint, C. M. V. (2023) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/s12977-023-00623-w · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Pin1‐Mediated Prolyl Isomerization of Runx1 Affects PU.1 Expression in Pre‐Monocytes
Islam, R., Yoon, W.-J., Woo, K., Baek, J., & Ryoo, H. (2014) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.24462 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hansda, A. K., Biswas, B. K., & Goswami, R. (2023) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156440 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hodawadekar, S., Wei, F., Yu, D., Thomas‐Tikhonenko, A., & Atchison, M. L. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6165 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCurtiss, B. M., VanCampen, J., Kong, G., Yashar, W. M., Tsang, Y. H., Horton, W. R., Coleman, D. J., Estabrook, J., Lusardi, T. A., Mills, G. B., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.24.456354 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Transcription Factor ERG is a Gatekeeper of Endothelial Cell Homeostasis
Dryden, N. H. (2012) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25560/9798
Ghavidel, P., Abdelmalki, Y., & Sincennes, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.31083/fbl46704
Roos‐Weil, D. (2018) · doi:10.70675/1030cb13z12b8z4f7cz8f8az165206a6209a
Ramani, M., Nguyen, N., Solis, J., Tenen, D. G., & Trinh, B. Q. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15181657
Transcription factors in the development of Th9 cells
Goswami, R. (2013) · ProQuest Demo Repository · doi:10.7912/c2/1714
- Authors
- Bai, Y., Srinivasan, L., Perkins, L., & Atchison, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5160-5169
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2135558550
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
- Keywords
- protein acetylation, PU.1, P300, histone deacetylase inhibition, trichostatin A, histone H3 acetylation, transcriptional activation, pre-B cells
- MeSH terms
- p300-CBP-Associated Factor, Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Acetylation, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Histones, Hydroxamic Acids, Immunoglobulin kappa-Chains
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review