Cited by 385Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Differential confounding of rare and common variants in spatially structured populations

Open access
Mathieson, Iain, McVean, Gil·2012·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Well-powered genome-wide association studies, now made possible through advances in technology and large-scale collaborative projects, promise to characterize the contribution of rare variants to complex traits and disease. However, while population structure is a known confounder of association studies, it remains unknown whether methods developed to control stratification are equally effective for rare variants. Here, we demonstrate that rare variants can show a stratification that is systematically different from, and typically stronger than, common variants, and this is not necessarily corrected by existing methods. We show that the same process leads to inflation for load-based tests and can obscure signals at truly associated variants. Furthermore, we show that populations can display spatial structure in rare variants, even when Wright's fixation index FST is low, but that allele frequency–dependent metrics of allele sharing can reveal localized stratification. These results underscore the importance of collecting and integrating spatial information in the genetic analysis of complex traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.1074

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Finding

    Excess allele sharing increases as frequency decreases, implying the effect will appear below some sufficiently low variant frequency even in relatively unstructured populations.

    “The fact that excess allele sharing increases as frequency decreases implies that even for relatively unstructured populations, this effect will be observed below some, sufficiently low, variant frequency.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    When non-genetic risk varies on a small scale, rare variants have a tail of highly correlated variants that drives inflation.

    “In contrast, when non-genetic risk varies on a small scale, although most variants are uncorrelated with the risk, rare variants have a tail of highly correlated variants (Fig. 2e), which drive the inflation”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2e

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Finding

    If misclassification is localized to a spatial area, it will produce the same effects described in the paper.

    “When this misclassification is restricted to a particular spatial area, for example a single recruitment center in a large study, it will produce the effects described here.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    If genetic risk is driven by only a few rare-variant loci, inflation is greater for rare variants and true signals are more likely to be obscured.

    “However, when there are only a few loci driving risk, inflation is greater for rare variants (Supplementary Fig. 4). Consequently, if genetic risk is driven by small numbers of rare variants, then true signals are more likely to be obscured by rare variants that show association even though they are not physically linked to the causal variants.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Supplementary Fig. 4

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Finding

    Populations can show spatial structure in rare variants even when FST is low, and allele-frequency-dependent allele-sharing metrics can reveal localized stratification.

    “We show that populations can display spatial structure in rare variants even when FST is low, but that allele-frequency dependent metrics of allele sharing can reveal localized stratification.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Typical approaches to account for population stratification based on principal components may not be adequate because PCs computed from common SNPs may not account for stratification at NIMs that tend to be rare on average.

    “Typical approaches to account for population stratification based on the inclusion of principal components (PCs) may not be adequate as these PCs are computed from common SNPs on the UKBB genotyping array and may not account for stratification at the NIMs that tend to be rare on average (Mathieson and McVean, 2012).”

    From The lingering effects of Neanderthal introgression on human complex traits (2023) · cites this paper as Mathieson and McVean, 2012

    The Results (page unavailable) show that PCA can fail to correct rare-variant stratification when non-genetic risk is spatially localized. The paper does not examine UKBB array SNPs or NIMs, and it attributes the simulated PCA failure to the limits of correction using the top components, rather than specifically to computing PCs from common SNPs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathieson, I., & McVean, G.
Affiliations
Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Mathieson, Iain
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2012-02-05
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
243-246
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2093636770
Cited by
385
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 21
FWCI
27.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (086084/Z/08/Z, 089250, 086084, 089250/Z/09/Z, 090532, 090532/Z/09/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
population stratification, rare variants, common genetic variants, spatial population structure, genome-wide association study, confounding, allele sharing, fixation index, complex traits
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Geography, Humans, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Risk Assessment, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-25.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review