Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conserved roles of mouse DUX and human DUX4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons

Open access
Hendrickson, Peter G, Doráis, Jessie A, Grow, Edward J, Whiddon, Jennifer L, Lim, Jong-Won, Wike, Candice L, Weaver, Bradley D, Pflueger, Christian, Emery, Benjamin R, Wilcox, Aaron L, Nix, David A, Peterson, C Matthew, Tapscott, Stephen J, Carrell, Douglas T, Cairns, Bradley R·2017·Nature Genetics

Abstract

To better understand transcriptional regulation during human oogenesis and preimplantation development, we defined stage-specific transcription, which highlighted the cleavage stage as being highly distinctive. Here, we present multiple lines of evidence that a eutherian-specific multicopy retrogene, DUX4, encodes a transcription factor that activates hundreds of endogenous genes (for example, ZSCAN4, KDM4E and PRAMEF-family genes) and retroviral elements (MERVL/HERVL family) that define the cleavage-specific transcriptional programs in humans and mice. Remarkably, mouse Dux expression is both necessary and sufficient to convert mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) into 2-cell-embryo-like ('2C-like') cells, measured here by the reactivation of '2C' genes and repeat elements, the loss of POU5F1 (also known as OCT4) protein and chromocenters, and the conversion of the chromatin landscape (as assessed by transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC–seq)) to a state strongly resembling that of mouse 2C embryos. Thus, we propose mouse DUX and human DUX4 as major drivers of the cleavage or 2C state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3844

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
Hendrickson, P. G., Doráis, J. A., Grow, E. J., Whiddon, J. L., Lim, J.-W., Wike, C. L., Weaver, B. D., Pflueger, C., Emery, B. R., Wilcox, A. L., Nix, D. A., Peterson, C. M., Tapscott, S. J., Carrell, D. T., & Cairns, B. R.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
925-934
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2611346822
Cited by
734
References
50
FWCI
20.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserved roles of mouse DUX and human DUX4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.3844
The paper
Hendrickson, P. G., Doráis, J. A., Grow, E. J., Whiddon, J. L., Lim, J.-W., Wike, C. L., Weaver, B. D., Pflueger, C., Emery, B. R., Wilcox, A. L., Nix, D. A., Peterson, C. M., Tapscott, S. J., Carrell, D. T., & Cairns, B. R. (2017). Conserved roles of mouse DUX and human DUX4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3844

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.