Cited by 345Williams Syndrome ResearchGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

A 1.5 million–base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome

Open access
Osborne, Lucy R., Li, Martin, Pober, Barbara, Chitayat, David, Bodurtha, Joann, Mandel, Ariane, Costa, Teresa, Grebe, Theresa +3 more·2001·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is most often caused by hemizygous deletion of a 1.5-Mb interval encompassing at least 17 genes at 7q11.23 (refs. 1,2). As with many other haploinsufficiency diseases, the mechanism underlying the WBS deletion is thought to be unequal meiotic recombination, probably mediated by the highly homologous DNA that flanks the commonly deleted region. Here, we report the use of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to identify a genomic polymorphism in families with WBS, consisting of an inversion of the WBS region. We have observed that the inversion is hemizygous in 3 of 11 (27%) atypical affected individuals who show a subset of the WBS phenotypic spectrum but do not carry the typical WBS microdeletion. Two of these individuals also have a parent who carries the inversion. In addition, in 4 of 12 (33%) families with a proband carrying the WBS deletion, we observed the inversion exclusively in the parent transmitting the disease-related chromosome. These results suggest the presence of a newly identified genomic variant within the population that may be associated with the disease. It may result in predisposition to primarily WBS-causing microdeletions, but may also cause translocations and inversions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng753

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Pober BR, Dykens EM. Williams syndrome: an overview of medical, cognitive, and behavioural features. Child Adoles Psychiatr Clin N Am. 1996;5:929–943. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osborne, L. R., Li, M., Pober, B., Chitayat, D., Bodurtha, J., Mandel, A., Costa, T., Grebe, T., Cox, S., Tsui, L.-C., & Scherer, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Scherer, Stephen W.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2001-10-29
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
321-325
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W1686085663
Cited by
344
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • University of Arizona
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (38103)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Williams syndrome, chromosomal inversions, hemizygous deletion, haploinsufficiency, genetic polymorphism, atypical phenotype, translocation, genetic susceptibility, chromosome 7
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7, Female, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Chromosome Inversion, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Williams Syndrome, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Physical Chromosome Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review