Cited by 590Microbial Fuel Cells and BioremediationPeatlands and Wetlands EcologySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Humic substances as fully regenerable electron acceptors in recurrently anoxic environments

Klüpfel, Laura, Piepenbrock, Annette, Kappler, Andreas, Sander, Michael·2014·Nature Geoscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ngeo2084

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klüpfel, L., Piepenbrock, A., Kappler, A., & Sander, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Kappler, Andreas
  • Sander, Michael
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Published
2014-02-27
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
195-200
ISSN
  • 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0908
OpenAlex
W2144379882
Cited by
590
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 7
FWCI
23.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
humic substances, terminal electron acceptors, redox cycling, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, anaerobic respiration, methane suppression, peatlands, wetlands, natural organic matter, electron transfer to oxygen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review