Cited by 1,666HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesGlobal Security and Public Health

Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge

S Epstein·1997·Nature Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm0297-242

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epstein, S.
Corresponding author
S Epstein
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
1997-02
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
242-243
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2147671322
Cited by
1,666
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 85
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
Keywords
AIDS, AIDS activism, politics of knowledge, science and activism, HIV/AIDS research, science policy
MeSH terms
AIDS-Related Complex, Humans, Politics, Research, United States, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review