Cited by 486Disability Rights and RepresentationBioethics and Human Rights IssuesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Crip technoscience manifesto

Open access
Hamraie, Aimi, Fritsch, Kelly·2019·Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience

Abstract

As disabled people engaged in disability community, activism, and scholarship, our collective experiences and histories have taught us that we are effective agents of world building and dismantling toward more socially just relations.The grounds for social justice and world remaking, however, are frictioned;technologies, architectures, and infrastructures are often designed and implemented without committing to disability as a difference that matters. This manifesto calls attention to the powerful, messy, non-innocent, contradictory, and nevertheless crucial work of what we name as “crip technoscience,” practices of critique, alteration, and reinvention of our material-discursive world. Disabled people are experts and designers of everyday life. But we also harness technoscience for political action, refusing to comply with demands to cure, fix, or eliminate disability. Attentive to the intersectional workings of power and privilege, we agitate against independence and productivity as requirements for existence. Instead, we center technoscientific activism and critical design practices that foster disability justice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Carleton University (CA)
Venue
Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-33
ISSN
2380-3312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944785538
Cited by
461
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8
FWCI
34.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
disability justice, people with disabilities, critical design, intersectionality, social justice, disability studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review