Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes

Open access
Yemini, Eviatar, Jucikas, Tadas, Grundy, Laura J, Brown, André E X, Schafer, William R·2013·Nature Methods
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2560
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using low-cost automated tracking microscopes, we have generated a behavioral database for 305 Caenorhabditis elegans strains, including 76 mutants with no previously described phenotype. The growing database currently consists of 9,203 short videos segmented to extract behavior and morphology features, and these videos and feature data are available online for further analysis. The database also includes summary statistics for 702 measures with statistical comparisons to wild-type controls so that phenotypes can be identified and understood by users.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2560

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Ramani, A.K. et al. Cell 148, 792–802 (2012). · DOI
  2. Houle, D., Govindaraju, D.R. & Omholt, S. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 855–866 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Husson, S.J., Costa, W.S., Schmitt, C. & Gottschalk, A. in WormBook (ed. Hobert, O.), 10.1895/wormbook.1.156.1 (2012). · DOI
  4. Hart, A.C. in WormBook (ed. Ambros, V.), 10.1895/wormbook.1.87.1 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Geng, W., Cosman, P., Berry, C.C., Feng, Z. & Schafer, W.R. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1811–1820 (2004). · DOI
  6. Cronin, C.J. et al. BMC Genet. 6, 5 (2005). · DOI
  7. Huang, K.M., Cosman, P. & Schafer, W.R. J. Neurosci. Methods 171, 153–164 (2008). · DOI
  8. Huang, K.M., Cosman, P. & Schafer, W.R. J. Neurosci. Methods 158, 323–336 (2006). · DOI
  9. Storey, J.D. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 64, 479–498 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Starich, T.A., Xu, J., Skerrett, I.M., Nicholson, B.J. & Shaw, J.E. Neural Dev. 4, 16 (2009). · DOI
  11. Yeh, E. et al. PLoS Biol. 6, e55 (2008). · DOI
  12. Boulin, T. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18590–18595 (2008). · DOI
  13. Kindt, K.S. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 568–577 (2007). · DOI
  14. Jose, A.M., Bany, I.A., Chase, D.L. & Koelle, M.R. Genetics 175, 93–105 (2007). · DOI
  15. Feng, Z. et al. Cell 127, 621–633 (2006). · DOI
  16. Ghosh, R., Mohammadi, A., Kruglyak, L. & Ryu, W.S. BMC Biol. 10, 85 (2012). · DOI
  17. Brown, A.E., Yemini, E.I., Grundy, L.J., Jucikas, T. & Schafer, W.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 791–796 (2013). · DOI
  18. Yemini, E., Kerr, R.A. & Schafer, W.R. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 1475–1479 (2011).
  19. Tsai, C.A. & Chen, J.J. Bioinformatics 25, 897–903 (2009). · DOI
  20. Zhao, B., Khare, P., Feldman, L. & Dent, J.A. J. Neurosci. 23, 5319–5328 (2003). · DOI
  21. McGrath, P.T. et al. Neuron 61, 692–699 (2009). · DOI
  22. Weber, K.P. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e13922 (2010). · DOI
  23. Brenner, S. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Otsu, N. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyber. 9, 62–66 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Freeman, H. IRE Trans. Electron. Comput. EC-10, 260–268 (1961). · DOI
  26. Sulston, J.E. & Horvitz, H.R. Dev. Biol. 56, 110–156 (1977). · DOI
  27. Alkema, M.J., Hunter-Ensor, M., Ringstad, N. & Horvitz, H.R. Neuron 46, 247–260 (2005). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yemini, E., Jucikas, T., Grundy, L. J., Brown, A. E. X., & Schafer, W. R.
Venue
Nature Methods
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-07-14
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
877-879
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
DOI
10.1038/nmeth.2560
OpenAlex
W2037478113
Cited by
310
References
2
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.