Cited by 284Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt

Held, Richard, Ostrovsky, Yuri, de Gelder, Beatrice, Gandhi, Tapan, Ganesh, Suma, Mathur, Umang, Sinha, Pawan·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Would a blind subject, on regaining sight, be able to immediately visually recognize an object previously known only by touch? We addressed this question, first formulated by Molyneux three centuries ago, by working with treatable, congenitally blind individuals. We tested their ability to visually match an object to a haptically sensed sample after sight restoration. We found a lack of immediate transfer, but such cross-modal mappings developed rapidly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2795

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Congenitally blind children given sight can quickly learn to map shapes to prior touch-based representations.

    “Empirical data supports this, showing that congenitally blind children given sight can quickly learn these abilities(Held et al., 2011).”

    From The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (2024) · cites this paper as Held et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Held, R., Ostrovsky, Y., de Gelder, B., Gandhi, T., Ganesh, S., Mathur, U., & Sinha, P.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Held, Richard
  • Sinha, Pawan
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2011-04-10
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
551-553
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2159354660
Cited by
284
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2011-08-26)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21ey015521-02)
  • National Eye Institute (R21-EY015521)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
cross-modal matching, congenital blindness, vision restoration, haptic perception, visual recognition, object recognition, Molyneux problem
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blindness, Child, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Sensory Deprivation, Touch, Vision, Ocular, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review