Cited by 49Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsFace recognition and analysis

Neurons in the human amygdala encode face identity, but not gaze direction

Open access
Mormann, Florian, Niediek, Johannes, Tudusciuc, Oana, Quesada, Carlos M, Coenen, Volker A, Elger, Christian E, Adolphs, Ralph·2015·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The amygdala is important for face processing, and direction of eye gaze is one of the most socially salient facial signals. Recording from over 200 neurons in the amygdala of neurosurgical patients, we found robust encoding of the identity of neutral-expression faces, but not of their direction of gaze. Processing of gaze direction may rely on a predominantly cortical network rather than the amygdala.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4139

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect found in discrimination of both negative and positive states supports evidence of a generalized role of OXT in modulating CeA function in response to socially communicated salient information.

    “The effect we found in the discrimination of both negative and positive states, however, supports the evidence of a generalized role of OXT in modulating CeA function in the response to socially communicated salient information, similar to evidence in humans [70,90,92,106,107].”
  • Mice can discriminate emotions in others in a way that is distinct from sociability.

    “our data provide some indication that, similar to human emotion recognition tasks [70,90,92,121], mice can discriminate emotions in others in a way that is distinct from sociability.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mormann, F., Niediek, J., Tudusciuc, O., Quesada, C. M., Coenen, V. A., Elger, C. E., & Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Mormann, Florian
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2015-10-19
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1568-1570
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1944652955
Cited by
49
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH094258)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
amygdala, face identity, gaze direction, single-unit recording, face processing, gaze, neural coding, neurosurgical patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review