Cited by 227Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationVestibular and auditory disorders

An independent, landmark-dominated head-direction signal in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex

Open access
Jacob, Pierre-Yves, Casali, Giulio, Spieser, Laure, Page, Hector, Overington, Dorothy, Jeffery, Kate·2017·Nature Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We investigated how landmarks influence the brain's computation of head direction and found that in a bidirectionally symmetrical environment, some neurons in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex showed bidirectional firing patterns. This indicates dominance of neural activity by local environmental cues even when these conflicted with the global head direction signal. It suggests a mechanism for associating landmarks to or dissociating them from the head direction signal, according to their directional stability and/or utility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4465

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Landmark and head-direction information within retrosplenial cortex presumably reflects its cingulum connections.

    “One potential example of the latter concerns landmark and head-direction information within retrosplenial cortex (Jacob et al., 2016), which presumably reflect its cingulum connections.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Jacob et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Taube JS Annu Rev Neurosci 2007 30 181 207 17341158
  2. [2]Taube JS Burton HL J Neurophysiol 1995 74 1953 1971 8592189
  3. [3]Knierim JJ Kudrimoti HS McNaughton BL J Neurosci 1995 15 1648 1659 7891125 PMC6578145
  4. [4]Auger SD Mullally SL Maguire EA PLoS One 2012 7 e43620 22912894 PMC3422332
  5. [5]Chen LL Lin LH Green EJ Barnes CA McNaughton BL Exp Brain Res 1994 101 8 23 7843305
  6. [6]Chen LL Lin LH Barnes CA McNaughton BL Exp Brain Res 1994 101 24 34 7843299
  7. [7]Cho J Sharp PE Behav Neurosci 2001 115 3 25 11256450
  8. [8]Sugar J Witter MP van Strien NM Cappaert NLM Front Neuroinform 2011 5 7 21847380 PMC3147162
  9. [9]Taube JS Muller RU Ranck-JB J J Neurosci 1990 10 436 447 2303852 PMC6570161
  10. [10]Yoganarasimha D J Neurosci 2006 26 622 631 16407560 PMC1388189
  11. [11]Cooper BG Manka TF Mizumori SJ Behav Neurosci 2001 115 1012 1028 11584914
  12. [12]Pothuizen HHJ Davies M Albasser MM Aggleton JP Vann SD Eur J Neurosci 2009 30 877 888 19712100
  13. [13]Marchette SA Vass LK Ryan J Epstein RA Nat Neurosci 2014 17 1598 1606 25282616 PMC4309016
  14. [14]Robertson CE Hermann KL Mynick A Kravitz DJ Kanwisher N Curr Biol 2016 26 2463 2468 27618266
  15. [15]Knight R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014 369 20120512 24366127 PMC3866437
  16. [16]Kadir SN Goodman DFM Harris KD Neural Comput 2014 26 2379 94 25149694 PMC4298163
  17. [17]Bonnevie T Nat Neurosci 2013 16 309 17 23334581
  18. [18]Giocomo LM Curr Biol 2014 24 252 262 24440398
  19. [19]Paxinos G Watson C Elsevier Acad Press 2007 170 547 612
  20. [20]Jeewajee A Barry C O’Keefe J Burgess N Hippocampus 2008 18 1175 1185 19021251 PMC3173868

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacob, P.-Y., Casali, G., Spieser, L., Page, H., Overington, D., & Jeffery, K.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2016-12-19
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
173-175
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2561396560
Cited by
227
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (103896, 103896AIA, 103896/Z/14/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (G1100669)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J009792/1, 1209669)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
head direction, retrosplenial cortex, landmark-based navigation, spatial cognition, environmental cues, directional stability
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cues, Head, Male, Neurons, Orientation, Rotation, Head Movements, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review