Cited by 220Motor Control and AdaptationFree Will and AgencyTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement

Open access
Voss, Martin, Ingram, James N, Haggard, Patrick, Wolpert, Daniel M·2006·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Voluntary actions typically produce suppression of afferent sensation from the moving body part. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to delay the output of motor commands from the motor cortex during voluntary movement. We show attenuation of sensation during this delay, in the absence of movement. We conclude that sensory suppression mainly relies on central signals related to the preparation for movement and that these signals are upstream of primary motor cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1592

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CD signals influence proprioceptive processing at multiple points in the neuraxis, ranging from the spinal cord to the cortex.

    “More generally, CD signals influence proprioceptive processing at multiple points in the neuraxis, ranging from the spinal cord83 to the cortex84.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [84]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voss, M., Ingram, J. N., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Voss, Martin
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2005-11-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
26-27
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2042953033
Cited by
220
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (077730)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
central motor command, motor cortex, voluntary movement, sensory suppression, motor preparation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, primary motor cortex
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Fingers, Humans, Motor Cortex, Movement, Sensation, Volition, Signal Transduction, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review