Cited by 210Schizophrenia research and treatmentFree Will and AgencyMental Health and Psychiatry

Did I do that? Abnormal predictive processes in schizophrenia when button pressing to deliver a tone

Open access
Ford, Judith M., Palzes, Vanessa A., Roach, Brian J., Mathalon, Daniel H.·2014·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Motor actions are preceded by an efference copy of the motor command, resulting in a corollary discharge of the expected sensation in sensory cortex. These mechanisms allow animals to predict sensations, suppress responses to self-generated sensations, and thereby process sensations efficiently and economically. During talking, patients with schizophrenia show less evidence of pretalking activity and less suppression of the speech sound, consistent with dysfunction of efference copy and corollary discharge, respectively. We asked if patterns seen in talking would generalize to pressing a button to hear a tone, a paradigm translatable to less vocal animals. In 26 patients [23 schizophrenia, 3 schizoaffective (SZ)] and 22 healthy controls (HC), suppression of the N1 component of the auditory event-related potential was estimated by comparing N1 to tones delivered by button presses and N1 to those tones played back. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) associated with the motor plan preceding presses to deliver tones was estimated by comparing right and left hemispheres' neural activity. The relationship between N1 suppression and LRP amplitude was assessed. LRP preceding button presses to deliver tones was larger in HC than SZ, as was N1 suppression. LRP amplitude and N1 suppression were correlated in both groups, suggesting stronger efference copies are associated with stronger corollary discharges. SZ have reduced N1 suppression, reflecting corollary discharge action, and smaller LRPs preceding button presses to deliver tones, reflecting the efference copy of the motor plan. Effects seen during vocalization largely extend to other motor acts more translatable to lab animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbt072

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrophysiological studies showed less N1 suppression in SCZ compared to healthy controls.

    “Electrophysiological studies showed a consistent pattern of reduced P3 in response to predictable stimuli (Fogelson et al., 2014), less N1 suppression (Ford et al., 2014), and higher P50 ratio (Whitton et al., 2021) in SCZ compared to HC.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, J. M., Palzes, V. A., Roach, B. J., & Mathalon, D. H.
Affiliations
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ford, Judith M.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2013-07-10
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
804-812
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2150991704
Cited by
210
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX000497)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh058262-17)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-58262, R01MH-058262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, efference copy
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Cortex, Contingent Negative Variation, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review