Cited by 313Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2014.135

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aaronson, S. & Arkhipov, A. in Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (eds Fortnow, L. & Vadhan, S.) 333–342 (ACM Press, 2011).
  2. Leverrier, A. & García-Patrón, R. Does boson sampling need fault-tolerance? Preprint at http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1309.4687 (2013). · arXiv
  3. Rohde, P. P., Motes, K. R. & Dowling, J. P. Sampling generalized cat states with linear optics is probably hard. Preprint at http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1310.0297 (2013). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Bentivegna, M., Brod, D. J., Crespi, A., Flamini, F., Giacomini, S., Milani, G., Ramponi, R., Mataloni, P., Osellame, R., Galvão, E. F., & Sciarrino, F.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
  • Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Osellame, Roberto
  • Galvão, Ernesto F.
  • Sciarrino, Fabio
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2014-06-22
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
615-620
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W1941757310
Cited by
312
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 13
FWCI
32.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (307783)
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Informação Quântica
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
boson sampling, photonic quantum computing, photon indistinguishability, multimode interferometer, integrated photonics, quantum advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review