CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian approach to Boson sampling validation

Bentivegna, Marco, Spagnolo, Nicolò, Vitelli, Chiara, Brod, Daniel J., Crespi, Andrea, Flamini, Fulvio, Ramponi, Roberta, Mataloni, Paolo, Osellame, Roberto, Galvão, Ernesto F., Sciarrino, Fabio·2014·International Journal of Quantum Information
DOI 10.1142/s021974991560028x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Boson sampling problem consists in sampling from the output probability distribution of a bosonic Fock state, after it evolves through a linear interferometer. There is strong evidence that Boson sampling is computationally hard for classical computers, while it can be solved naturally by bosons. This has led it to draw increasing attention as a possible way to provide experimental evidence for the quantum computational supremacy. Nevertheless, the very complexity of the problem makes it hard to exclude the hypothesis that the experimental data are sampled from a different probability distribution. By exploiting integrated quantum photonics, we have carried out a set of three-photon Boson sampling experiments and analyzed the results using a Bayesian approach, showing that it represents a valid alternative to currently used methods. We adopt this approach to provide evidence that the experimental data correspond to genuine three-photon interference, validating the results against fully and partially-distinguishable photon hypotheses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s021974991560028x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First experimental demonstrations in bulk optics were reported in 2009 for the simulation of anyons and for the calculation of the energy spectrum of a hydrogen molecule.

    “First experimental demonstrations in bulk optics were reported in 2009 for the simulation of anyons, fractional-statistics particles responsible for the fractional quantum Hall effect [628,629] and for the calculation of the energy spectrum of a hydrogen molecule [630]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [629]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1007/BF02650179 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511979309 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022328 · DOI
  4. Shor P. W., 1997, SIAM J. Comput.
  5. Valiant L. G., 1979, Theoretical Computer Science
  6. 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.1231692 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022332 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.063822 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.120501 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.1173731 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/ncomms2349 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1126/science.1155441 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1364/JOSAB.20.001559 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.47 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130503 · DOI
  19. Cover T. M., 2006, Elements of Information Theory
  20. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.152 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bentivegna, M., Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Brod, D. J., Crespi, A., Flamini, F., Ramponi, R., Mataloni, P., Osellame, R., Galvão, E. F., & Sciarrino, F.
Venue
International Journal of Quantum Information
Publisher
World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Published
2014-11
Volume
12
Issue
07n08
Pages
1560028
ISSN
  • 0219-7499
  • 1793-6918
DOI
10.1142/s021974991560028x
Cited by
49
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review