CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 97

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental quantum key distribution without monitoring signal disturbance

Takesue, Hiroki, Sasaki, Toshihiko, Tamaki, Kiyoshi, Koashi, Masato·2015·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/nphoton.2015.173
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2015.173

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several specific quantum optical implementations rely on the HOM effect, including solving systems of linear equations, computation on encrypted data, computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform, and computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes.

    “There are several examples of specific quantum optical implementations that rely on the HOM effect, to list a few: solving systems of linear equations [128,129], computation on encrypted data [130], computing discrete and fractional Fourier transform [131], and computations on a single spatial mode (using temporal modes) [132].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [130]

    Citation [132] is attached to the example of computations on a single spatial mode using temporal modes. The experimental-setup passage describes temporally delayed interferometers for quantum key distribution, but does not address that computational implementation or its reliance on the HOM effect. Searches for single-spatial-mode computation and HOM-based temporal-mode computation found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing 175–179 (IEEE Press, 1984).
  2. Bennett, C. H. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121–3124 (1992). · DOI
  3. Huttner, B., Imoto, N., Gisin, N. & Mor, T. Quantum cryptography with coherent states. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1863–1869 (1995). · DOI
  4. Jouguet, P., Kunz-Jacques, S., Leverrier, A., Grangier, P. & Diamanti, E. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Nature Photon. 14, 378–381 (2013). · DOI
  5. Inoue, K., Waks, E. & Yamamoto, Y. Differential phase shift quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 037902 (2002). · DOI
  6. Scarani, V., Acin, A., Ribordy, G. & Gisin, N. Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulse implementations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057901 (2004). · DOI
  7. Stucki, D., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Scarani, V. & Zbinden, H. Fast and simple one-way quantum key distribution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 194108 (2005). · DOI
  8. Dixon, A. R., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F., Sharpe, A. W. & Shields, A. J. Gigahertz decoy quantum key distribution with 1 Mbit/s secure key rate. Opt. Express 16, 18790–18797 (2008). · DOI
  9. Zhang, Q. et al. Megabits secure key rate quantum key distribution. New J. Phys. 11, 045010 (2009). · DOI
  10. Dixon, A. R., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F., Sharpe, A. W. & Shields, A. J. Continuous operation of high bit rate quantum key distribution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 161102 (2010). · DOI
  11. Tanaka, A. et al. High-speed quantum key distribution system for 1-Mbps real-time key generation. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 48, 542–550 (2012). · DOI
  12. Lucamarini, M. et al. Efficient decoy-state quantum key distribution with quantified security. Opt. Express 21, 24550–24565 (2013). · DOI
  13. Gobby, C., Yuan, Z. L. & Shields, A. J. Quantum key distribution over 122 km of standard telecom fiber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 3762–3764 (2004). · DOI
  14. Takesue, H. et al. Quantum key distribution over 40 dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors. Nature Photon. 1, 343–348 (2007). · DOI
  15. Korzh, B. et al. Provably secure and practical quantum key distribution over 307 km of optical fiber. Nature Photon. 9, 163–168 (2015). · DOI
  16. Peev, M. et al. The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna. New J. Phys. 11, 075001 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sasaki, M. et al. Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD network. Opt. Express 19, 10387–10409 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Scarani, V. et al. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301–1350 (2009). · DOI
  19. Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, Y. & Koashi, M. Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance. Nature 509, 475–478 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Waks, E., Takesue, H. & Yamamoto, Y. Security of differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution against individual attacks. Phys. Rev. A 73, 012344 (2006). · DOI
  21. Wen, K., Tamaki, K. & Yamamoto, Y. Unconditional security of single-photon differential phase shift quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 170503 (2009). · DOI
  22. Tamaki, K., Koashi, M. & Kato, G. Unconditional security of coherent-state-based differential phase shift quantum key distribution protocol with block-wise phase randomization. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1995 (2012). · arXiv
  23. Honjo, T., Inoue, K. & Takahashi, H. Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution experiment with a planar light-wave circuit Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Opt. Lett. 29, 2797–2799 (2004). · DOI
  24. Honjo, T. & Inoue, K. Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with an extended degree of freedom. Opt. Lett. 31, 522–524 (2006). · DOI
  25. Kwack, M. J. et al. Compact optical buffer module for intra-packet synchronization based on InP 1×8 switch and silica-based delay line circuit. IEICE Trans. Electron. E96-C, 738–743 (2013). · DOI
  26. Najafi, F. et al. On-chip detection of non-classical light by scalable integration of single-photon detectors. Nature Commun. 6, 5873 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Goh, T. et al. Low-loss and high-extinction ratio silica-based strictly nonblocking 16×16 thermooptic matrix switch. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 810–812 (1998). · DOI
  28. Lo, H.-K., Ma, X. & Chen, K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Yamazaki, H., Yamada, T., Goh, T., Sakamaki, Y. & Kaneko, A. 64QAM modulator with a hybrid configuration of silica PLCs and LiNbO3 phase modulators. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22, 344–346 (2010). · DOI
  30. Gottesman, D., Lo, H.-K., Lütkenhaus, N. & Preskill, J. Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect device. Quant. Inf. Comp. 4, 325–360 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takesue, H., Sasaki, T., Tamaki, K., & Koashi, M.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-09-14
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
827-831
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/nphoton.2015.173
Cited by
97
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review