The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions
Open accessAbstract
A three-photon entangled state with 3 × 3 × 2 dimensions of its orbital angular momentum is created by using two independent entangled photon pairs from two nonlinear crystals, enabling the development of a new layered quantum communication protocol. Forming the backbone of quantum technologies today, entanglement1,2 has been demonstrated in physical systems as diverse as photons3, ions4 and superconducting circuits5. Although steadily pushing the boundary of the number of particles entangled, these experiments have remained in a two-dimensional space for each particle. Here we show the experimental generation of the first multi-photon entangled state where both the number of particles and dimensions are greater than two. Two photons in our state reside in a three-dimensional space, whereas the third lives in two dimensions. This asymmetric entanglement structure6 only appears in multiparticle entangled states with d > 26. Our method relies on combining two pairs of photons, high-dimensionally entangled in their orbital angular momentum7. In addition, we show how this state enables a new type of ‘layered’ quantum communication protocol. Entangled states such as these serve as a manifestation of the complex dance of correlations that can exist within quantum mechanics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
(1989) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4 · Cited by 1,632
Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states
Mermin, N. D. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1838 · Cited by 1,482
Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement
Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35000514 · Cited by 1,209
Self-citationObservation of Three-Photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Entanglement
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1345 · Cited by 1,061
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Schrödinger, E. Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 823–828 (1935). · DOI · Paper page
- Trimmer, J. D. The present situation in quantum mechanics: a translation of Schrödinger's “Cat Paradox” paper. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 124, 323–338 (1980).
- Yao, X.-C. et al. Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nature Photon. 6, 225–228 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Lanyon, B. P. et al. Experimental violation of multipartite bell inequalities with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 100403 (2014). · DOI
- Kelly, J. et al. State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature 519, 66–69 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Huber, M. & de Vicente, J. Structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 030501 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Zeilinger, A., Horne, M., Weinfurter, H. & Żukowski, M. Three-particle entanglements from two entangled pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3031–3034 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
- Klyachko, A. A., Can, M. A., Binicioğlu, S. & Shumovsky, A. S. Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 020403 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- Lapkiewicz, R. et al. Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system. Nature 474, 490–493 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Cerf, N., Bourennane, M., Karlsson, A. & Gisin, N. Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127902 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Mirhosseini, M. et al. High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light. New J. Phys. 17, 033033 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Malik, M. & Boyd, R. W. Quantum imaging technologies. Riv. Nuovo Cimento 37, 273–332 (2014).
- Molina-Terriza, G., Torres, J. P. & Torner, L. Twisted photons. Nature Phys. 3, 305–310 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Dada, A. C., Leach, J., Buller, G. S., Padgett, M. J. & Andersson, E. Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities. Nature Phys. 7, 677–680 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Krenn, M. et al. Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6243–6247 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, X.-L. et al. Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon. Nature 518, 516–519 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Huber, M., Perarnau-Llobet, M. & de Vicente, J. I. Entropy vector formalism and the structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 88, 042328 (2013). · DOI
- Cadney, J., Huber, M., Linden, N. & Winter, A. Inequalities for the ranks of multipartite quantum states. Linear Algebra Appl. 452, 153–171 (2014). · DOI
- Leach, J., Padgett, M. J., Barnett, S. M. & Franke-Arnold, S. Measuring the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257901 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Kaltenbaek, R. Interference of Photons from Independent Sources PhD thesis, Univ. Vienna (2009).
- Fickler, R. et al. Interface between path and orbital angular momentum entanglement for high-dimensional photonic quantum information. Nature Commun. 5, 4502 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Hillery, M., Bužek, V. & Berthiaume, A. Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829–1834 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
- Mirhosseini, M., Malik, M., Shi, Z. & Boyd, R. W. Efficient separation of the orbital angular momentum eigenstates of light. Nature Commun. 4, 2781 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Krenn, M., Malik, M., Fickler, R., Lapkiewicz, R. & Zeilinger, A. Automated search for new quantum experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02749 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
- Vieira, A. R., Hor-Myell, M. & Khoury, A. Z. Spin-orbit mode selection with a modified Sagnac interferometer. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1623–1626 (2013). · DOI
- Scheidl, T. et al. Crossed-crystal scheme for femtosecond-pulsed entangled photon generation in periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate. Phys. Rev. A 89, 042324 (2014). · DOI
- Lavery, M. et al. Robust interferometer for the routing of light beams carrying orbital angular momentum. New J. Phys. 13, 093014 (2011). · DOI
- Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
- Tonolini, F., Chan, S., Agnew, M., Lindsay, A. & Leach, J. Reconstructing high-dimensional two-photon entangled states via compressive sensing. Sci. Rep. 4, 6542 (2014). · DOI
- Händchen, V. et al. Observation of one-way Einstein–Podolsky-Rosen steering. Nature Photon. 6, 596–599 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Orbital angular momentum 25 years on [Invited]
Padgett, M. J. (2017) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.25.011265 · Cited by 837
Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics
Wang, J., Paesani, S., Ding, Y., Santagati, R., Skrzypczyk, P., Salavrakos, A., Tura, J., Augusiak, R., Mančinska, L., Bacco, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar7053 · Cited by 816
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Kues, M., Reimer, C., Lukens, J. M., Munro, W. J., Weiner, A. M., Moss, D. J., & Morandotti, R. (2019) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0363-0 · Cited by 697
Photonic quantum information processing: a concise review
Slussarenko, S., & Pryde, G. J. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5115814 · Cited by 644
Metadata
- Authors
- Malik, M., Erhard, M., Huber, M., Krenn, M., Fickler, R., & Zeilinger, A.
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2016-02-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 248-252
- ISSN
- 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4893
- OpenAlex
- W2196764475
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 31.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphoton.2016.12
- The paper
- Malik, M., Erhard, M., Huber, M., Krenn, M., Fickler, R., & Zeilinger, A. (2016). Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions. Nature Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.