Cited by 176Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

On the estimation of the local dark matter density using the rotation curve of the Milky Way

Open access
de Salas, P.F., Malhan, K., Freese, K., Hattori, K., Valluri, M.·2019·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

The rotation curve of the Milky Way is commonly used to estimate the local dark matter density ρDM,⊙. However, the estimates are subject to the choice of the distribution of baryons needed in this type of studies. In this work we explore several Galactic mass models that differ in the distribution of baryons and dark matter, in order to determine ρDM,⊙. For this purpose we analyze the precise circular velocity curve measurement of the Milky Way up to ∼ 25 kpc from the Galactic centre obtained from Gaia DR2 [1]. We find that the estimated value of ρDM,⊙ stays robust to reasonable changes in the spherical dark matter halo. However, we show that ρDM,⊙ is affected by the choice of the model for the underlying baryonic components. In particular, we find that ρDM,⊙ is mostly sensitive to uncertainties in the disk components of the Galaxy. We also show that, when choosing one particular baryonic model, the estimate of ρDM,⊙ has an uncertainty of only about 10% of its best-fit value, but this uncertainty gets much bigger when we also consider the variation of the baryonic model. In particular, the rotation curve method does not allow to exclude the presence of an additional very thin component, that can increase ρDM,⊙ by more than a factor of 8 (the thin disk could even be made of dark matter). Therefore, we conclude that exclusively using the rotation curve of the Galaxy is not enough to provide a robust estimate of ρDM,⊙. For all the models that we study without the presence of an additional thin component, our resulting estimates of the local dark matter density take values in the range ρDM,⊙ ≃ 0.3−0.4 GeV/cm 3 , consistent with many of the estimates in the literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/037

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This result supports previous studies that have found that the poorly known baryonic distribution in the MW is the main systematic uncertainty in the determination of the local DM density.

    “This result supports previous studies that have found that the poorly known baryonic distribution in the MW is the main systematic uncertainty in the determination of the local DM density”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as de Salas et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]Gaia Collaboration, A. Helmi et al., Gaia Data Release 2. Kinematics of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way , Astron. Astrophys. 616 (2018) A12, [ arXiv:1804.09381 ]. · arXiv
  2. [8]D. W. Hogg, A.-C. Eilers, and H.-W. Rix, Spectrophotometric parallaxes with linear models: Accurate distances for luminous red-giant stars , arXiv:1810.09468 . · arXiv
  3. [47]S. Bose, D. J. Eisenstein, L. Hernquist, A. Pillepich, D. Nelson, F. Marinacci, V. Springel, and M. Vogelsberger, Revealing the galaxy-halo connection in IllustrisTNG , arXiv:1905.08799 . · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Salas, P. F., Malhan, K., Freese, K., Hattori, K., & Valluri, M.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2019-10-14
Volume
2019
Issue
10
Pages
037-037
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2950271187
Cited by
176
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 5
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0007859)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AK79G)
  • University of Michigan
  • Vetenskapsrådet (638- 2013-8993)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
local dark matter density, Milky Way rotation curve, dark matter halos, thin disk, disk mass distribution, Gaia DR2, circular velocity curves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review