CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 335Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The Milky Way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2

Open access
Cautun, Marius, Benitez-Llambay, Alejandro, Deason, Alis J., Frenk, Carlos S., Fattahi, Azadeh, Gómez, Facundo A., Grand, Robert J. J., Oman, Kyle A. +2 more·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1911.04557arXiv 1911.04557
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We determine the Milky Way (MW) mass profile inferred from fitting physically motivated models to the Gaia DR2 Galactic rotation curve and other data. Using various hydrodynamical simulations of MW-mass haloes, we show that the presence of baryons induces a contraction of the dark matter (DM) distribution in the inner regions, r<20 kpc. We provide an analytic expression that relates the baryonic distribution to the change in the DM halo profile. For our galaxy, the contraction increases the enclosed DM halo mass by factors of roughly 1.3, 2 and 4 at radial distances of 20, 8 and 1 kpc, respectively compared to an uncontracted halo. Ignoring this contraction results in systematic biases in the inferred halo mass and concentration. We provide a best-fitting contracted NFW halo model to the MW rotation curve that matches the data very well. The best-fit has a DM halo mass, $M_{200}^{\rm DM}=0.97_{-0.19}^{+0.24}\times10^{12} M_\odot$, and concentration before baryon contraction of $9.4_{-2.6}^{+1.9}$, which lie close to the median halo mass--concentration relation predicted in $Λ$CDM. The inferred total mass, $M_{200}^{\rm total}=1.08_{-0.14}^{+0.20} \times 10^{12} M_\odot$, is in good agreement with recent measurements. The model gives a MW stellar mass of $5.04_{-0.52}^{+0.43}\times10^{10} M_\odot$ and infers that the DM density at the Solar position is $ρ_{\odot}^{\rm DM}=8.8_{-0.5}^{+0.5}\times10^{-3} M_\odot \rm{pc}^{-3}\equiv0.33_{-0.02}^{+0.02}~\rm{GeV}~\rm{cm}^{-3}$. The rotation curve data can also be fitted with an uncontracted NFW halo model, but with very different DM and stellar parameters. The observations prefer the physically motivated contracted NFW halo, but the measurement uncertainties are too large to rule out the uncontracted NFW halo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1911.04557

Cites

173 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 175 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bailin J., Steinmetz M., 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 627, 647
  2. Bozorgnia N., Fattahi A., Frenk C. S., Cheek A., Cerdeno D. G., Gómez F. A., Grand R. J. J., Marinacci F., 2019, preprint, ( arXiv:1910.07536 ) · arXiv
  3. Callingham T. M., Cautun M., Deason A. J., Frenk C. S., Grand R. J. J., Marinacci F., Pakmor R., 2020, preprint, ( arXiv:2001.07742 ) · arXiv
  4. Karukes E. V., Benito M., Iocco F., Trotta R., Geringer-Sameth A., 2019a, preprint, ( arXiv:1912.04296 ) · arXiv
  5. Li Z.-Z., Qian Y.-Z., Han J., Li T. S., Wang W., Jing Y. P., 2019, preprint, ( arXiv:1912.02086 ) · arXiv
  6. Pieres A., et al., 2019, preprint, ( arXiv:1904.04350 ) · arXiv
  7. ``` Piffl T., Penoyre Z., Binney J., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 639 Planck Collaboration et al., 2014, A&A, 571, A1 Portail M., Gerhard O., Wegg C., Ness M., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1621 Posti L., Helmi A., 2019, A&A, 621, A56 Pouliasis E., Di Matteo P., Haywood M., 2017, A&A, 598, A66 Power C., Navarro J. F., Jenkins A., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., Springel V., Stadel J., Quinn T., 2003, MNRAS, 338, 14 Purcell C. W., Zentner A. R., 2012, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2012, 007 Read J. I., 2014, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 41, 063101 Rossi E. M., Marchetti T., Cacciato M., Kuiack M., Sari R., 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1844 Sawala T., et al., 2016a, MNRAS, 456, 85 Sawala T., et al., 2016b, MNRAS, 457, 1931 Schaller M., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1247 Schaye J., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 446, 521 Schneider M. D., Frenk C. S., Cole S., 2012, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, 2012, 030 Sellwood J. A., McGaugh S. S., 2005, ApJ, 634, 70 Shao S., Cautun M., Frenk C. S., Gao L., Crain R. A., Schaller M., Schaye J., Theuns T., 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3772 Shao S., Cautun M., Frenk C. S., Grand R. J. J., Gómez F. A., Marinacci F., Simpson C. M., 2018a, MNRAS, 476, 1796 Shao S., Cautun M., Deason A. J., Frenk C. S., Theuns T., 2018b, MNRAS, 479, 284 Shao S., Cautun M., Deason A. J., Frenk C. S., 2019a, in prep. Shao S., Cautun M., Frenk C. S., 2019b, MNRAS, 488, 1166 Simpson C. M., Grand R. J. J., Gómez F. A., Marinacci F., Pakmor R., Springel V., Campbell D. J. R., Frenk C. S., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 548 Sloane J. D., Buckley M. R., Brooks A. M., Governato F., 2016, ApJ, 831, 93 Smith M. C., et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 755 Springel V., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105 Springel V., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791 Springel V., Yoshida N., White S. D. M., 2001, New Astron., 6, 79 Trayford J. W., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2879 Tumlinson J., Peeples M. S., Werk J. K., 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389 Vera-Ciro C., Helmi A., 2013, ApJ, 773, L4 Vogelsberger M., Zavala J., Loeb A., 2012, MNRAS, 423, 3740 Wang J., Frenk C. S., Navarro J. F., Gao L., Sawala T., 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2715 Wang W., Han J., Cooper A. P., Cole S., Frenk C., Lowing B., 2015, MNRAS, 453, 377 Wang W., Han J., Cole S., Frenk C., Sawala T., 2017, MNRAS, 470, 2351 Wang W., Han J., Cole S., More S., Frenk C., Schaller M., 2018, MNRAS, 476, 5669 Wang W., Han J., Cautun M., Li Z., Ishigaki M. N., 2019, preprint, ( arXiv:1912.02599 ) Watkins L. L., Evans N. W., An J. H., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 264 Watkins L. L., van der Marel R. P., Sohn S. T., Evans N. W., 2019, ApJ, 873, 118 Weber M., de Boer W., 2010, A&A, 509, A25 Wegg C., Gerhard O., Bieth M., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3296 White S. D. M., Frenk C. S., 1991, ApJ, 379, 52 Xue X. X., et al., 2008, ApJ, 684, 1143 Zavala J., Frenk C. S., 2019, Galaxies, 7, 81 de Salas P. F., Malhan K., Freese K., Hattori K., Valluri M., 2019, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2019, 037 ``` · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cautun, M., Benitez-Llambay, A., Deason, A. J., Frenk, C. S., Fattahi, A., Gómez, F. A., Grand, R. J. J., Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., & Simpson, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of La Serena (CL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Cautun, Marius
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
494
Issue
3
Pages
4291-4313
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1911.04557
arXiv
1911.04557
OpenAlex
W2988879082
Cited by
335
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 1
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Durham University (ST/R000832/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/K00042X/1)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/T001550/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/R00689X/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/R001014/1, ST/V002376/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/T001348/1, ST/V002635/1, ST/P003400/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/L000636/1, ST/R000832, ST/R002371/1, ST/M007006/1, ST/P000673/1, ST/S003800/1, 1181264, ST/P000541/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/M006948/1, ST/P002447/1, ST/M007618/1, ST/T001569/1, ST/R000832/1, ST/P000541, ST/T000244/1, ST/V002384/1, ST/R001006/1, ST/S003762/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/T001372/1, ST/S003916/1, 794474, ST/M006530/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/R001049/1)
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (1181264)
  • H2020 European Research Council (DMIDAS [GA 786910])
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
dark matter halos, galaxy rotation curves, stellar mass, fluid simulation, Gaia DR2, halo bias, halo concentration-mass relation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review