The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium‐mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana
Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x · Cited by 21,934
Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering
Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · Cited by 5,762
A Simple and General Method for Transferring Genes into Plants
Horsch, R. B., Fry, J. E., Hoffmann, N. L., Wallroth, M., Eichholtz, D., Rogers, S. G., & Fraley, R. T. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.227.4691.1229 · Cited by 4,694
A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants
Xing, H.-L., Dong, L., Wang, Z.-P., Zhang, H.-Y., Han, C.-Y., Liu, B., Wang, X.-C., & Chen, Q.-J. (2014) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y · Cited by 1,684
Self-citationCRISPR-Cas Systems in Bacteria and Archaea: Versatile Small RNAs for Adaptive Defense and Regulation
Bhaya, D., Davison, M., & Barrangou, R. (2011) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132430 · Cited by 914
Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system
Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., & Gao, C. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.157 · Cited by 763
Self-citationWroblewski, T., Tomczak, A., & Michelmore, R. (2005) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00123.x · Cited by 558
Gutierrez, C. (1999) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) · doi:10.1007/s000180050433 · Cited by 328
Up-regulation ofLSB1/GDU3affects geminivirus infection by activating the salicylic acid pathway
Chen, H., Zhang, Z., Teng, K., et al. (2009) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04120.x · Cited by 77
Cited by
CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review
Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00985 · Cited by 619
Towards CRISPR/Cas crops – bringing together genomics and genome editing
Scheben, A., Wolter, F., Batley, J., Puchta, H., & Edwards, D. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14702 · Cited by 313
The CRISPR/Cas Genome-Editing Tool: Application in Improvement of Crops
Khatodia, S., Bhatotia, K., Passricha, N., Khurana, S. M. P., & Tuteja, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00506 · Cited by 267
Zaidi, S. S.-E.-A., Mahas, A., Vanderschuren, H., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02204-y · Cited by 221
Engineering PGPMOs through Gene Editing and Systems Biology: A Solution for Phytoremediation?
Basu, S., Rabara, R. C., Negi, S., & Shukla, P. (2018) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.01.011 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Ji, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Gao, C.
- Venue
- Nature Plants
- Published
- 2015-09-28
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 15144-15144
- ISSN
- 2055-026X (ISSN-L)
- 2055-0278
- OpenAlex
- W1940949464
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 12.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nplants.2015.144
- The paper
- Ji, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Gao, C. (2015). Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nature Plants. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
