Cited by 586Genetic and Environmental Crop StudiesAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementBotany and Plant Ecology Studies

Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives

Open access
Castañeda-Álvarez, Nora P., Khoury, Colin K., Achicanoy, Harold A., Bernau, Vivian, Dempewolf, Hannes, Eastwood, Ruth J., Guarino, Luigi, Harker, Ruth H. +8 more·2016·Nature Plants

Abstract

The wild relatives of domesticated crops possess genetic diversity useful for developing more productive, nutritious and resilient crop varieties. However, their conservation status and availability for utilization are a concern, and have not been quantified globally. Here, we model the global distribution of 1,076 taxa related to 81 crops, using occurrence information collected from biodiversity, herbarium and gene bank databases. We compare the potential geographic and ecological diversity encompassed in these distributions with that currently accessible in gene banks, as a means to estimate the comprehensiveness of the conservation of genetic diversity. Our results indicate that the diversity of crop wild relatives is poorly represented in gene banks. For 313 (29.1% of total) taxa associated with 63 crops, no germplasm accessions exist, and a further 257 (23.9%) are represented by fewer than ten accessions. Over 70% of taxa are identified as high priority for further collecting in order to improve their representation in gene banks, and over 95% are insufficiently represented in regard to the full range of geographic and ecological variation in their native distributions. The most critical collecting gaps occur in the Mediterranean and the Near East, western and southern Europe, Southeast and East Asia, and South America. We conclude that a systematic effort is needed to improve the conservation and availability of crop wild relatives for use in plant breeding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nplants.2016.22

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castañeda-Álvarez, N. P., Khoury, C. K., Achicanoy, H. A., Bernau, V., Dempewolf, H., Eastwood, R. J., Guarino, L., Harker, R. H., Jarvis, A., Maxted, N., Müller, J. V., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Sosa, C. C., Struik, P. C., Vincent, H., & Toll, J.
Affiliations
  • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO)
  • Global Crop Diversity Trust (DE)
  • Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB)
  • CGIAR (FR)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Nature Plants
Published
2016-03-21
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
16022-16022
ISSN
  • 2055-026X (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-0278
OpenAlex
W2308914663
Cited by
586
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 16
FWCI
65.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Plants (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
  • Crop Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
Keywords
crop wild relatives, conservation priorities, gene bank, genetic diversity, germplasm accession, plant breeding
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Geography, Crops, Agricultural, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review