Cited by 133Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Effect of the mGluR5-NAM Basimglurant on Behavior in Adolescents and Adults with Fragile X Syndrome in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial: FragXis Phase 2 Results

Open access
FragXis Study Group, Youssef, Eriene A, Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth, Czech, Christian, Hagerman, Randi J, Hessl, David, Wong, Chin Y, Rabbia, Michael +11 more·2018·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Preclinical data suggest that inhibition of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) receptor might hold therapeutic benefits in Fragile X syndrome (FXS). Treatment of Fmr1 knockout mice with mGluR5-negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) has been reported to correct a broad range of phenotypes related to FXS. The early short-term clinical trials with mGluR5 NAMs, including basimglurant, assessing the effects in individuals with FXS, were supportive of further exploration in larger, well-controlled trials. We evaluated basimglurant, a potent and selective mGluR5 NAM, in a 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study of 183 adults and adolescents (aged 14-50, mean 23.4 years) with FXS. Individuals with an FMR1 full mutation were randomized to placebo or one of two doses of basimglurant. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in behavioral symptoms using the Anxiety Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) total score. All treatment arms showed marked behavioral improvements from baseline to week 12 with less improvement in the basimglurant 1.5 mg arm than placebo; however, basimglurant 0.5 mg was inferior to placebo in the ADAMs total score. Treatment with basimglurant was overall well-tolerated. A higher incidence of adverse events classified as psychiatric disorders were reported in patients treated with basimglurant, including three patients with hallucinations or psychosis. In this phase 2 clinical trial, basimglurant did not demonstrate improvement over placebo. Evaluation of the overall risk-benefit in younger patient populations is an important consideration for the design of potential further investigations of efficacy with this class of medications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2017.177

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the adult and adolescent FragXis study, patients were randomly assigned to basimglurant or placebo with stratification by gender and age group.

    “Patients were randomly assigned to receive basimglurant (0.5 or 1.5 mg once a day (q.d.)) or placebo, with stratification by gender and age group (14–17 and 18–50 years) to ensure that about one-third of participants were adolescents.”
  • A large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial with the mGluR5 antagonist basimglurant was conducted in adult and adolescent patients with FXS.

    “This reference reports the large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial with the mGluR5 antagonist basimglurant in adult and adolescent patients with FXS.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FragXis Study Group, Youssef, E. A., Berry-Kravis, E., Czech, C., Hagerman, R. J., Hessl, D., Wong, C. Y., Rabbia, M., Deptula, D., John, A., Kinch, R., Drewitt, P., Lindemann, L., Marcinowski, M., Langland, R., Horn, C., Fontoura, P., Santarelli, L., & Quiroz, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Gilead Sciences (United States) (US)
  • Roche (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Youssef, Eriene A
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2017-08-17
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
503-512
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2750406832
Cited by
133
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, negative allosteric modulators, FMR1 full mutation, behavioral symptoms, anxiety, depression, psychosis, hallucinations, adverse events, adolescents, adults, risk-benefit assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Imidazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotropic Drugs, Pyridines, RNA, Messenger, Treatment Failure, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, DNA Methylation, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1, Young Adult, Receptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review