Cited by 2,209Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysImmune Response and Inflammation

Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture

Open access
Rittirsch, Daniel, Huber-Lang, Markus S, Flierl, Michael A, Ward, Peter A·2009·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Sepsis remains a prevalent clinical challenge and the underlying pathophysiology is still poorly understood. To investigate the complex molecular mechanisms of sepsis, various animal models have been developed, the most frequently used being the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model in rodents. In this model, sepsis originates from a polymicrobial infectious focus within the abdominal cavity, followed by bacterial translocation into the blood compartment, which then triggers a systemic inflammatory response. A requirement of this model is that it is performed with high consistency to obtain reproducible results. Evidence is now emerging that the accompanying inflammatory response varies with the severity grade of sepsis, which is highly dependent on the extent of cecal ligation. In this protocol, we define standardized procedures for inducing sepsis in mice and rats by applying defined severity grades of sepsis through modulation of the position of cecal ligation. The CLP procedure can be performed in as little as 10 min for each animal by an experienced user, with additional time required for subsequent postoperative care and data collection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2008.214

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CLP model has been widely used for decades as the gold standard sepsis model because it establishes hemodynamics, metabolic changes, and inflammatory progression similar to those observed in human sepsis.

    “In our current study, we established an SAE model via cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) surgery, which has been widely used for decades as the gold standard sepsis model because it establishes hemodynamics, metabolic changes, and inflammatory progression similar to those observed in human sepsis (Rittirsch et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14]Wichterman KA Baue AE Chaudry IH Sepsis and septic shock—a review of laboratory models and a proposal J Surg Res 29 189 201 1980 6997619
  2. [16]Smith EF III Fluid resuscitation improves survival of endotoxemic or septicemic rats: possible contribution of tumor necrosis factor Pharmacology 46 254 267 1993 8488170
  3. [18]Xiao H Siddiqui J Remick DG Mechanisms of mortality in early and late sepsis Infect Immun 74 5227 5235 2006 16926416 PMC1594860
  4. [23]Newcomb D Bolgos G Green L Remick DG Antibiotic treatment influences outcome in murine sepsis: mediators of increased morbidity Shock 10 110 117 1998 9721977

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rittirsch, D., Huber-Lang, M. S., Flierl, M. A., & Ward, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Ward, Peter A
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2008-12-11
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
31-36
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2023945291
Cited by
2,209
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 190 · 2025: 194 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 212 · 2022: 198 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 103 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 54
FWCI
20.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01gm061656-09, 5r01gm029507-30)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 31963, P01HL031963)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM061656, GM‐61656, R37GM029507, GM 029507, R01-GM029507)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
sepsis, cecal ligation and puncture, animal models of sepsis, bacterial translocation, systemic inflammatory response, co-infection, mouse and rat models
MeSH terms
Animals, Cecum, Disease Models, Animal, Ligation, Sepsis, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review