The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New technologies to assess genotype–phenotype relationships
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Functional Characterization of the S. cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., Andre, B., Bangham, R., Benito, R., Boeke, J. D., Bussey, H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901 · Cited by 3,953
Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698
Cited by
Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks
Covert, M. W., Knight, E. M., Reed, J. L., Herrgard, M. J., & Palsson, B. O. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02456 · Cited by 792
The model organism as a system: integrating 'omics' data sets
Joyce, A. R., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1857 · Cited by 785
Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria
Bochner, B. R. (2009) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00149.x · Cited by 440
Self-citationLu, H., Li, F., Sánchez, B. J., Zhu, Z., Li, G., Domenzain, I., Marcišauskas, S., Anton, P. M., Lappa, D., Lieven, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11581-3 · Cited by 361
Ingham, C. J., Sprenkels, A., Bomer, J., Molenaar, D., van den Berg, A., van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T., & de Vos, W. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701693104 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Bochner, B. R.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-314
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W2792930549
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New technologies to assess genotype–phenotype relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrg1046
- The paper
- Bochner, B. R. (2003). New technologies to assess genotype–phenotype relationships. Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
