The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncovering cryptic genetic variation
Abstract
Cryptic genetic variation is the dark matter of biology: it is variation that is not normally seen, but that might be an essential source of physiological and evolutionary potential. It is uncovered by environmental or genetic perturbations, and is thought to modify the penetrance of common diseases, the response of livestock and crops to artificial selection and the capacity of populations to respond to the emergence of a potentially advantageous macro-mutation. We argue in this review that cryptic genetic variation is pervasive but under-appreciated, we highlight recent progress in determining the nature and identity of genes that underlie cryptic genetic effects and we outline future research directions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is as true of threshold-dependent characters and cryptic variation93 as it is of continuous variation.”
From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [93]
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
(2002) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00356.x · Cited by 6,176
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
J.-M., G., & Falconer, D. S. (1962) · Population · doi:10.2307/1525780 · Cited by 3,773
Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution
Rutherford, S. L., & Lindquist, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24550 · Cited by 2,270
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138
A vision for the future of genomics research
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., Guyer, M. S., & on behalf of the US National Human Genome Research Institute (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01626 · Cited by 1,752
McAlpine, J. F., Peterson, B. V., Shewell, G. E., Teskey, H. J., Vockeroth, J. R., & Wood, D. M. (1981) · Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, eBooks · Cited by 1,611
Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man
Schadt, E. E., Monks, S. A., Drake, T. A., Lusis, A. J., Che, N., Colinayo, V. V., Ruff, T. G., Milligan, S. B., Lamb, J. R., Cavet, G., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01434 · Cited by 1,501
GENETIC ASSIMILATION OF AN ACQUIRED CHARACTER
Waddington, C. H. (1953) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1953.tb00070.x · Cited by 1,494
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Ptashne, M. A Genetic Switch: Phage Lambda and Higher Organisms (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1992).
- Dworkin, I. in Variation (eds Hallgrimsson, B. & Hall, B. K.) Ch. 14 (Academic, San Francisco, 2004).
- Gibson, G. et al. Extensive non-additivity of gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics (in the press).
- Waddington, C. H. The Stratgey of the Genes (Allen and Unwin, London, 1957).
- Rendel, J. M. Canalization and gene control. (Logos, New York, 1967).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 545
Chow, C. Y., Kelsey, K. J. P., Wolfner, M. F., & Clark, A. G. (2015) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddv502 · Cited by 79
Zhang, X., & Hill, W. G. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01774.x · Cited by 83
Beever, J., Smit, M., Meyers, S. N., Hadfield, T. S., Bottema, C., Albretsen, J., & Cockett, N. (2006) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01398.x · Cited by 74
“The discovery of this additional layer of variation, known as cryptic genetic variation (for review, see Gibson & Dworkin 2004 ), has emphasized that simple Mendelian traits, as well as quantitative traits, can be influenced by complex genetic and environmental factors (for review, see Zlotogora 2003).”
BackgroundThe Evolution of Variability and Robustness in Neural Development
Hiesinger, P. R., & Hassan, B. A. (2018) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.05.007 · Cited by 78
“This is because robustness allows the accumulation of mutations (cryptic genetic variation [5]), and thus eventually ‘evolutionary innovation’, with minimal effects on fitness in the intervening time (reviewed in [6–8]), although the generality of this idea has been questioned [9].”
Inbreeding by Environmental Interactions Affect Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster
Kristensen, T. N., Sørensen, P. B., Pedersen, K. S., Kruhøffer, M., & Loeschcke, V. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.054486 · Cited by 83
“The evolutionary importance of this phenomenon has recently received much attention (Rutherford 2003; Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Hoffmann and McKenzie 2005).”
BackgroundGenetic accommodation and behavioural evolution: insights from genomic studies
Renn, S. C. P., & Schumer, M. E. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.012 · Cited by 81
“A modern interpretation of these results is that the stimulus exposed cryptic genetic variation, allowing selection for the constitutive expression of this trait (Rutherford & Lindquist 1998; Gibson & Dworkin 2004; Schlichting 2008).”
BackgroundThe complex underpinnings of genetic background effects
Mullis, M. N., Matsui, T., Schell, R., Foree, R., & Ehrenreich, I. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06023-5 · Cited by 83
Evolution of behavioural phenotypes: influences of ancestry and expression
Foster, S. A. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.008 · Cited by 80
Wild worm embryogenesis harbors ubiquitous polygenic modifier variation
Paaby, A. B., White, A. G., Riccardi, D., Gunsalus, K. C., Piano, F., & Rockman, M. V. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.09178 · Cited by 74
Garfield, D. A., Runcie, D. E., Babbitt, C. C., Haygood, R., Nielsen, W., & Wray, G. A. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001696 · Cited by 84
“Cryptic genetic variation is evolutionarily significant, because mutation or stress can unmask it, sometimes with dramatic phenotypic consequences [9,66,67].”
BackgroundGenetics of gene expression responses to temperature stress in a sea urchin gene network
Runcie, D. E., GARFIELD, D. A., Babbitt, C. C., Israel, J. W., Mukherjee, S., & Wray, G. A. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05717.x · Cited by 80
“Together, these results provide novel insights into the relationship between environmental change and developmental evolution and suggest that climate change may not expose large amounts of cryptic genetic variation to selection in this species.”
BackgroundChen, B., & Wagner, A. (2012) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-25 · Cited by 76
“Genetic polymorphisms are widespread in many populations [47,59], but the incidence of cryptic variation is usually unknown for wild populations [14,15].”
BackgroundInfluentialDworkin, I. (2005) · Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01799.x · Cited by 78
“The analysis of cryptic genetic variation has since been extended using quantitative genetics (Gibson and van Helden 1997; Polaczyk et al. 1998; Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Dworkin 2005b).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEvolution of variation in presence and absence of genes in bacterial pathways
Francis, A. R., & Tanaka, M. M. (2012) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-55 · Cited by 74
“This scenario is very similar to the notion of cryptic genetic variation, or evolutionary capacitance, which is usually discussed in the context of eukaryotes [26-28].”
BackgroundCryptic Genetic Variation in Natural Populations: A Predictive Framework
Ledón‐Rettig, C. C., Pfennig, D. W., Chunco, A. J., & Dworkin, I. M. (2014) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icu077 · Cited by 73
“Thus, an alternate view of how populations adapt to rapidly changing conditions suggests that the environment itself influences the phenotypic expression of genetic variation, thereby providing the raw material for adaptation to occur (Gibson and Dworkin 2004).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA New Development: Evolving Concepts in Leaf Ontogeny
Townsley, B. T., & Sinha, N. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105524 · Cited by 73
Systems Biology of Phenotypic Robustness and Plasticity
Nijhout, H. F., Sadre‐Marandi, F., Best, J. A., & Reed, M. C. (2017) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icx076 · Cited by 71
Ocean pH fluctuations affect mussel larvae at key developmental transitions
Kapsenberg, L., Miglioli, A., Bitter, M. C., Tambutté, É., Dumollard, R., & Gattuso, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.2381 · Cited by 72
Does phenotypic plasticity initiate developmental bias?
Parsons, K. J., McWhinnie, K., Pilakouta, N., & Walker, L. (2019) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/ede.12304 · Cited by 71
“Thus, the idea of CGV largely holds to the same convention of general mutations in that variation is created randomly to facilitate the creation of phenotypic variation.”
InfluentialWund, M. A., Valena, S., WOOD, S., & Baker, J. A. (2012) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01815.x · Cited by 69
“However, a new environment not only imposes new selection pressures, it also determines how standing genetic variation translates into the phenotypic variation upon which those selection pressures act (Gibson & Dworkin, 2004; Le Rouzic & Carlborg, 2008; McGuigan et al., 2010a; Schlichting, 2008).”
BackgroundGenomics and the evolution of phenotypic traits
Wray, G. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135828 · Cited by 68
From “the Worm” to “the Worms” and Back Again: The Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Nematodes
Haag, E. S., Fitch, D. H. A., & Delattre, M. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.118.300243 · Cited by 68
Modern Morphometrics of Medically Important Insects
Dujardin, J. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384890-1.00016-9 · Cited by 66
Robustness and flexibility in nematode vulva development
Félix, M., & Barkoulas, M. (2012) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.01.002 · Cited by 62
Nijhout, H. F., Best, J. A., & Reed, M. C. (2014) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2014.08.015 · Cited by 62
Molecular mechanisms of robustness in plants
Lempe, J., Lachowiec, J., Sullivan, A. M., & Queitsch, C. (2012) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2012.12.002 · Cited by 63
“Cryptic genetic variation — is genetic variation that is phenotypically silent until revealed by environmental, genetic, or epigenetic perturbations [8].”
Evolutionary response when selection and genetic variation covary across environments
Wood, C. W., & Brodie, E. D. (2016) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12662 · Cited by 62
“The environment likewise influences expressed genetic variation in a trait (Queitsch et al. 2002; Gibson & Dworkin 2004; Barrett & Schluter 2008; Barrett et al. 2009).”
BackgroundResultCell protective mechanism of valproic acid in lethal hemorrhagic shock
Li, Y., Liu, B., Sailhamer, E. A., Yuan, Z., Shults, C., Velmahos, G. C., DeMoya, M. A., Shuja, F., Butt, M., & Alam, H. B. (2008) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.037 · Cited by 61
Dworkin, I. M., Kennerly, E., Tack, D. C., Hutchinson, J., Brown, J., Mahaffey, J. W., & Gibson, G. C. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.096453 · Cited by 62
Self-citationBridging the Gap Between Modern Evolutionary Psychology and the Study of Individual Differences
Penke, L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372090.003.0009 · Cited by 61
Cichlid fishes as a model to understand normal and clinical craniofacial variation
Powder, K. E., & Albertson, R. C. (2015) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.12.018 · Cited by 55
“This observation suggests that cryptic genetic variation, a pool of genetic variation that does not result in phenotypic variation under “normal” conditions (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Paaby and Rockman, 2014), is prominent for the craniofacial skeleton.”
Abasht, B., & Lamont, S. J. (2007) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01642.x · Cited by 57
Peterson, T., & Müller, G. B. (2016) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-016-9372-9 · Cited by 59
“An issue that population genetics faces when determining selection on novel genes, or how these novel genes may impact the phenotype, is that new genomic sequences may be modifiers of existing genes (Merlo and Boyle 2003), and may function via the release of cryptic variation (Gibson and Dworkin 2004).”
BackgroundRapid morphological change of a top predator with the invasion of a novel prey
Cattau, C. E., Fletcher, R. J., Kimball, R. T., Miller, C. W., & Kitchens, W. M. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0378-1 · Cited by 58
Palmer, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21447 · Cited by 57
Gene expression profiling of the green seed problem in Soybean
Teixeira, R. N., Ligterink, W., França-Neto, J. D. B., Hilhorst, H. W. M., & da Silva, E. A. A. (2016) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-016-0729-0 · Cited by 57
“stressed environmental conditions it clearly leads to a Chl retention phenotype suggesting cryptic genetic variation between these two genotypes [48, 49].”
Llewelyn, J., Macdonald, S., Moritz, C. C., Martins, F. M., Hatcher, A., & Phillips, B. L. (2018) · Integrative Zoology · doi:10.1111/1749-4877.12309 · Cited by 56
Gray, A. J., & Cavers, S. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt060 · Cited by 56
“There is increasing molecular evidence from single-species studies to support the classification of intraspecific taxa without clear differentiation in the phenotype, that is cryptic species (Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Masel 2006; Bickford et al. 2007; Hayden et al. 2011; Schaefer et al. 2011), hence, SIE S is highly li…”
BackgroundIncredible Utility: The Lost Causes and Causal Debris of Psychological Science
Richters, J. E. (2021) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2021.1979003 · Cited by 58
Wund, M. A., Valena, S., Wood, S., & Baker, J. A. (2011) · PubMed · doi:10.5061/dryad.hb824gd4 · Cited by 55
Drury, C., Schopmeyer, S. A., Goergen, E. A., Bartels, E., Nedimyer, K., Johnson, M. E., Maxwell, K. E., Galván, V., Manfrino, C., & Lirman, D. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3184 · Cited by 55
“These markers, which are distributed throughout the genome, can be used to analyze within-species diversity, infer demography, understand evolutionary processes, and uncover cryptic genetic variation (Gibson & Dworkin, 2004; Luikart, England, Tallmon, Jordan, & Taberlet, 2003).”
Natural Variation in Decision-Making Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Miller, P. M., Saltz, J. B., Cochrane, V. A., Marcinkowski, C. M., Mobin, R., & Turner, T. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016436 · Cited by 54
“For example, it may be that this variation is ‘‘cryptic’’ in the wild, and only becomes additive (selectable) in laboratory conditions [30].”
BackgroundBelleghem, S. M. V., Roelofs, D., Houdt, J. V., & Hendrickx, F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042605 · Cited by 54
“regulatory changes) [18,19,20,21], (iii) if the recurrent appearance of this trait is caused by independent mutations or rather by introgression of standing genetic variation [22,23] or the release of cryptic genetic variation by changes in epistatic interactions [24,25], and (iv) how disruptive selection in dispersal…”
BackgroundCarroll, S. M., & Marx, C. J. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003427 · Cited by 57
“However, in genetic assimilation, stress-induced phenotypes arise from cryptic genetic variation in populations [40] while, at least for the reinforced up-regulation of pntAB expression, the initial response required no standing genetic variation at all.”
BackgroundChintamanani, S., Hulbert, S. H., Johal, G. S., & Balint-Kurti, P. J. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.111880 · Cited by 54
“In Drosophila, many components of the sevens pathway that executes eye formation were identified using a genetically hypersensitive background generated by the ectopic expression of a component of the pathway (Gibson and Dworkin 2004).”
BackgroundCryptic genetic variation shapes the adaptive evolutionary potential of enzymes
Baier, F., Hong, N., Yang, G., Pabis, A., Miton, C. M., Barrozo, A. H., Carr, P. D., Kamerlin, S. C. L., Jackson, C. J., & Tokuriki, N. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40789 · Cited by 54
“Genetic diversity across orthologous proteins is thought to be predominantly neutral with respect to their native, physiological function, but can cause variation in other non-physiological phenotypic properties, a phenomenon known as ‘cryptic genetic variation’ (Le Rouzic and Carlborg, 2008; Gibson and Dworkin, 2004;…”
BackgroundRegulatory mechanisms link phenotypic plasticity to evolvability
van Gestel, J., & Weissing, F. J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24524 · Cited by 54
A simulation study of gene-by-environment interactions in GWAS implies ample hidden effects
Marigorta, U. M., & Gibson, G. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00225 · Cited by 57
“…consist of (i) uncovering of new cryptic susceptibility variants that did not previously participate in the genetic architecture of the trait (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004), or (ii) an increase in the effect size of variants already associated with obesity before the emergence of the current…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPlasticity and evolution in correlated suites of traits
Fischer, E. K., Ghalambor, C. K., & Hoke, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12839 · Cited by 53
“…variance within the native rearing environment and that novel environments (i.e. environments where selection has not had an opportunity to historically act) result in the expression of increased variation (Gibson & Dworkin, 2004; Schlichting, 2008; McGuigan & Sgr o, 2009; McGuigan et al., 2010).”
BackgroundDevelopmental Plasticity in PlantsPreprint
de Jong, M., & Leyser, O. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2012.77.014720 · Cited by 53
Cryptic Variation between Species and the Basis of Hybrid Performance
Rosas, U., Barton, N., Copsey, L., de Reuille, P. B., & Coen, E. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000429 · Cited by 52
“related species mainly involves either loci with small quantitative effects, or loci conferring no detectable phenotypic effect, known as cryptic variation [14–20].”
BackgroundThe Nature of Nurture and the Future of Evodevo: Toward a Theory of Developmental Evolution
Moczek, A. P. (2012) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/ics048 · Cited by 51
“Trait heritabilities, or the fraction of phenotypic variation due to additive genetic variation, also change greatly with environmental conditions (Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Schlichting 2008).”
BackgroundCosts and Benefits of Mutational Robustness in RNA Viruses
Stern, A., Bianco, S., Yeh, M. T., Wright, C., Butcher, K. D., Tang, C., Nielsen, R., & Andino, R. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.011 · Cited by 52
“In sexual organisms, it is expected that robustness will directly increase the amount of hidden (‘‘cryptic’’) genetic variation within a population (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004).”
BackgroundBuffering of Genetic Regulatory Networks inDrosophila melanogaster
Fear, J. M., León‐Novelo, L., Morse, A. M., Gerken, A. R., Lehmann, K.-V., Tower, J., Nuzhdin, S. V., & McIntyre, L. M. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.188797 · Cited by 52
“Gene expression evolves under a house-of-cards model of stabilizing selection (Hodgins-Davis et al. 2015), maintaining population genetic variation (Jin et al. 2001; Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Nuzhdin et al. 2004).”
BackgroundMinelli, A. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv134 · Cited by 52
“…some of the possible phenotypes; a part of the population’s genetic variation is thus subject to relaxed selection and eventually accumulates despite not being expressed (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Le Rouzic and Carlborg, 2008; Lahti et al., 2009; Snell-Rood et al., 2010; Van Dyken and Wade, 2010).”
BackgroundNatural Variation in Biogenesis Efficiency of Individual Arabidopsis thaliana MicroRNAs
Todesco, M., Balasubramanian, S., Cao, J., Ott, F., Sureshkumar, S., Schneeberger, K., Meyer, R. C., Altmann, T., & Weigel, D. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.060 · Cited by 50
“Such cryptic variation can determine the consequences of both deleterious and beneficial second-site mutations and affects the success of breeding programs [7–9].”
Developmental plasticity and evolution—quo vadis?
Moczek, A. P. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.14 · Cited by 50
“…recognize that penetrance of mutant phenotypes, trait heritabilities and trait covariance structures are all influenced by environmental conditions, and are thereby able to alter evolutionary trajectories, sometimes in profound ways (Stearns, 1989; Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Schlichting, 2008).”
BackgroundZhao, Y., Long, L., Xu, W. X., Campbell, R. F., Large, E. E., Greene, J. S., & McGrath, P. T. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.38675 · Cited by 50
Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity Stabilizes Evolution in Fluctuating Environments
Lalejini, A., Ferguson, A. J., Grant, N. A., & Ofria, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.715381 · Cited by 49
“merely accumulates deleterious alleles (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Paaby and Rockman, 2014; Zheng et al., 2019).”
Widespread Genomic Incompatibilities inCaenorhabditis elegans
Snoek, B. L., Orbidans, H. E., Stastna, J. J., Aartse, A., Rodríguez, M. G., Riksen, J. A. G., Kammenga, J. E., & Harvey, S. C. (2014) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.114.013151 · Cited by 49
Espinosa‐Soto, C., Martin, O., & Wagner, A. (2011) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02261.x · Cited by 49
“It does so by allowing the accumulation of genetic variation that is not observed phenotypically under typical conditions, but that may be exposed after non-genetic perturbations (de Visser et al., 2003; Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Masel, 2006; Masel and Siegal, 2009).”
BackgroundGibson, G., & Reed, L. K. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.011 · Cited by 49
Self-citationEvolution of growth by genetic accommodation in Icelandic freshwater stickleback
Robinson, B. W. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2197 · Cited by 48
Fischer, E. K., Ghalambor, C. K., & Hoke, K. L. (2016) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icw087 · Cited by 48
Fishing for the secrets of vertebrate evolution in threespine sticklebacks
Peichel, C. L. (2005) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.20564 · Cited by 47
“An alternative explanation for the existence of parallel evolution in closely related lineages is that cryptic genetic variation that is present in the ancestral population is uncovered when the organism is exposed to a novel environment (Bell, 1974, 1988; Gibson and Dworkin, 2004 ).”
BackgroundAlexandra, P., & Roff, D. A. (2014) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12483 · Cited by 47
“Mutational variance, as defined by Gibson & Dworkin (2004), is the ‘tendency towards dispersion of data about the mean due to new mutations that arise in each generation.’”
BackgroundDecanalization, brain development and risk of schizophrenia
McGrath, J. J., Hannan, A. J., & Gibson, G. C. (2011) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2011.16 · Cited by 48
“as a buffer to allow an organism exposed to an unexpected environmental stress, or to a de novo mutation, to resist the transition to alternative phenotypes.(6)”
BackgroundSelf-citationBadyaev, A. V., Potticary, A. L., & Morrison, E. S. (2017) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/692327 · Cited by 45
Mechanisms and Evolution of Environmental Responses in Caenorhabditis elegans
Braendle, C., Milloz, J., & Félix, M. (2007) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(07)80005-6 · Cited by 47
“Such genetic variation that does not translate into phenotypic variation is often termed hidden or cryptic genetic variation (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004).”
Regulation of apomixis: learning from sexual experience
Rodríguez-Leal, D., & Vielle‐Calzada, J. (2012) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2012.09.005 · Cited by 46
Richardson, J. B., Uppendahl, L. D., Traficante, M. K., Levy, S. F., & Siegal, M. L. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003733 · Cited by 45
“Previous studies have demonstrated the release of cryptic genetic variation after a genetic or environmental perturbation [2,9–16 , 20– 29 ].”
Snell‐Rood, E. C., Burger, M. K., Hutton, Q., & Moczek, A. P. (2016) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-015-9813-4 · Cited by 44
Homeostasis and Dynamic Stability of the Phenotype Link Robustness and Plasticity
Nijhout, H. F., & Reed, M. C. (2014) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icu010 · Cited by 45
“This study thus supports the theoretical notion that disruption or destabilization of canalizing or homeostatic mechanisms can enhance phenotypic variability by releasing previously cryptic genetic variation (Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Suzuki and Nijhout 2006; WestEberhard 2003, 2005).”
BackgroundResultSilvera, K., Winter, K., Rodriguez, B. L., Albion, R. L., & Cushman, J. C. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru234 · Cited by 45
“There is increasing evidence for the importance of cryptic and standing genetic variation in evolution (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Barrett and Schluter, 2007; McGuigan and Sgro, 2009) and no special mechanism is required for such variation to explain the convergent use of ancestral alleles in a new…”
BackgroundMechanism of evolution by genetic assimilation
Nishikawa, K., & Kinjo, A. R. (2018) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-018-0403-x · Cited by 45
Reed, R. D., Chen, P., & Nijhout, H. F. (2007) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2006.00133.x · Cited by 44
“Populations can harbor significant cryptic genetic variation that has little or no phenotypic effect under normal conditions (Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Dworkin 2005).”
BackgroundUncovering hidden genetic variation in photosynthesis of field‐grown maize under ozone pollution
Choquette, N. E., Ogut, F., Wertin, T. M., Montes, C. M., Sorgini, C. A., Morse, A. M., Brown, P. J., Leakey, A. D. B., McIntyre, L. M., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14794 · Cited by 41
“Furthermore, selection for A under standard growing conditions of the Midwest in the United States would fail to select against deleterious alleles that confer sensitivity to elevated O3 (Gibson & Dworkin, 2004).”
BackgroundLarmuseau, M., Vancampenhout, K., Raeymaekers, J. A. M., Houdt, J. K. J. V., & Volckaert, F. A. M. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04643.x · Cited by 44
“Finally, the F261Y mutation may also have been introduced through hybridization and introgression following backcrossing with other species (Gibson & Dworkin 2004).”
BackgroundPeak and Persistent Excess of Genetic Diversity Following an Abrupt Migration Increase
Alcala, N., Streit, D., Goudet, J., & Vuilleumier, S. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.147785 · Cited by 46
“First, under new selective pressures, the adaptive value of a preexisting allele can switch from neutral or deleterious to beneficial (Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Hermisson and Pennings 2005).”
BackgroundA single-nucleotide change underlies the genetic assimilation of a plastic trait
Vigne, P., Gimond, C., Ferrari, C., Vielle, A., Hallin, J., Pino-Querido, A., Mouridi, S. E., Mignerot, L., Frøkjær‐Jensen, C., Boulin, T., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd9941 · Cited by 39
“Under Waddington’s view, genetic assimilation is the result of selection on “cryptic” genetic variation, genetic variation that is not expressed in the ancestral environment—implicitly a form of nonadditive or epistatic gene interactions (16, 26).”
BackgroundOvercoming maladaptive plasticity through plastic compensation
Morris, M. R. J., & Rogers, S. M. (2013) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/59.4.526 · Cited by 44
“This cryptic genetic variation (CGV) (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Schlichting, 2008; Hayden et al., 2011; McGuigan et al., 2011) may be expressed due to a breakdown in the mechanisms that suppress the influence of genetic variation on the phenotype, or to the accumulation of neutral mutations in unexpressed regions of t…”
BackgroundMining and Harnessing Natural Variation: A Little MAGIC
Johal, G. S., Balint-Kurti, P. J., & Weil, C. F. (2008) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0150 · Cited by 42
“The fi rst reports of CGV arose largely through noticing that Drosophila mutations of interest appeared either suppressed or enhanced when crossed into diff erent inbred backgrounds that otherwise showed no noticeable mutant phenotype for the trait (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004).”
BackgroundJarosz, D. F. (2015) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2015.11.001 · Cited by 41
Miller, C. W., McDonald, G. C., & Moore, A. J. (2016) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12954 · Cited by 42
“For example, raising animals on artificial diets may result in unusually high levels of genetic variation because cryptic genetic variation in a novel (artificial) environment has been revealed (Gibson & Dworkin, 2004; Led on-Rettig et al., 2014).”
BackgroundDecanalizing thinking on genetic canalization
Geiler‐Samerotte, K., Sartori, F. M. O., & Siegal, M. L. (2018) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.05.008 · Cited by 40
“Cryptic genetic variation is common, having been observed in a variety of systems for a variety of phenotypes [25,26].”
BackgroundPoullet, N., Vielle, A., Gimond, C., Ferrari, C., & Braendle, C. (2015) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/ede.12170 · Cited by 39
“…the uncovered intra- and interspecific variation in temperatureinduced developmental errors may be considered examples of cryptic genetic variation (Gibson and Dworkin 2004; Paaby and Rockman 2014) or developmental system’s drift (True and Haag 2001), that is, usually phenotypically invisible…”
BackgroundDevelopment and evolution of character displacement
Pfennig, D. W., & Pfennig, K. S. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06381.x · Cited by 42
A pair of homoeolog ClpP5 genes underlies a virescent yellow‐like mutant and its modifier in maize
Xing, A., Williams, M. E., Bourett, T. M., Hu, W. L., Hou, Z., Meeley, R. B., Jaqueth, J. S., Dam, T., & Li, B. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12568 · Cited by 40
David, J. R., Legout, H., & Moréteau, B. (2006) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02728965 · Cited by 41
“Several investigators have argued that, under stressful conditions, a cryptic genetic variability could be unravelled, leading to the possibility of a faster adaptive response (Bijlsma and Loeschcke 1997; Hoffmann and Parsons 1997; Rutherford and Lindquist 1998; Gibson and Dworkin 2004).”
BackgroundHow might epigenetics contribute to ecological speciation?
Smith, G., & Ritchie, M. G. (2013) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/59.5.686 · Cited by 38
“…novel environments, result in the release of cryptic genetic variation, alter the mean and variance of phenotypes on which selection can then act and facilitate rapid adaptation (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Lande, 2009; Le Rouzic and Carlborg, 2008; Schlichting, 2008; Scoville and Pfrender, 2010).”
Threshold-dominated regulation hides genetic variation in gene expression networks
Gjuvsland, A. B., Plahte, E., & Omholt, S. W. (2007) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-1-57 · Cited by 39
“Hidden (or cryptic) genetic variation is defined as "standing genetic variation that does not contribute to the normal range of phenotypes observed in a population, but that is available to modify a phenotype that arises after environmental change or the introduction of novel alleles [49].”
BackgroundContrasting DNA methylation responses of inbred fish lines to different rearing environments
Berbel‐Filho, W. M., Rodríguez‐Barreto, D., Berry, N., de Leániz, C. G., & Consuegra, S. (2019) · Epigenetics · doi:10.1080/15592294.2019.1625674 · Cited by 36
“The large differences in number of DMCs we found between lines could be explained by their genetic differences [39].”
BackgroundEvolutionary Consequences of Social Isolation
Bailey, N. W., & Moore, A. J. (2018) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.05.008 · Cited by 36
Hagiwara, W. E., Uwatoko, N., SASAKI, A., Matsubara, K., Nagano, H., Onishi, K., & Sano, Y. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04119.x · Cited by 37
“Hidden variations due to the linked QTLs Cryptic genetic variation is uncovered by environment or genetic perturbations, and is thought to be increasingly relevant in quantitative traits (Rieseberg et al. 1999; Mackay 2001; Gibson & Dworkin 2004).”
BackgroundFeder, M. E. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02725 · Cited by 39
“In hindsight, many features of living things are evolutionary capacitors or render genetic variation cryptic (Gibson and Dworkin, 2004; Masel, 2006).”
BackgroundBack to the future: implications of genetic complexity for the structure of hybrid breeding programs
Technow, F., Podlich, D., & Cooper, M. (2021) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab153 · Cited by 35
Weak Epistasis Generally Stabilizes Phenotypes in a Mouse Intercross
Tyler, A. L., Donahue, L. R., Churchill, G. A., & Carter, G. W. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005805 · Cited by 34
“One possible consequence is that the measured phenotypes have been decanalized and some of the QTL we observed may correspond to cryptic genetic variation [45, 46, 69] that only influence traits in the presence of the lit/litmutation.”
BackgroundRe-evaluating the environment in developmental evolution
Moczek, A. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00007 · Cited by 37
“…Armin P. Moczek, Department of Biology, Indiana University, 915 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405-7107, USA e-mail: armin@indiana.edu This manuscript reviews our growing understanding of the role of environmental conditions in shaping development and developmental evolution.”
BackgroundIs polycystic ovary syndrome a 20th Century phenomenon?
Rodgers, R. J., Suturina, L., Lizneva, D., Davies, M. J., Hummitzsch, K., Irving-Rodgers, H. F., & Robertson, S. A. (2019) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2019.01.019 · Cited by 34
“nalisation, could have been disrupted, permitting the expression of underlying cryptic genetic variation from natural selection or mutation [32].”
BackgroundMultiple capacitors for natural genetic variation in D rosophila melanogaster
Takahashi, K. H. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12091 · Cited by 35
“Cryptic genetic variation (CGV) is ubiquitous and abundant among organisms (Schlichting 2008; Masel & Trotter 2010), and it might be an important source of physiological and evolutionary potential (Gibson & Dworkin 2004).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibson, G., & Dworkin, I.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gibson, Greg
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 681-690
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W2079319076
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- cryptic genetic variation, susceptibility genes, gene perturbation, selective breeding, disease penetrance, adaptive potential
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Quantitative Trait, Heritable
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review